|
In the photo at right, taken from a video that the US Government offered as an exhibit at
the Zacharias Moussaoui trial, you see at the lower left a 9/11 suspect allegedly at a Dulles Airport security checkpoint
on the morning of 9/11. (A film editor framed this suspect in a box for demonstration purposes.) But I draw your
attention to the pedestrian in the far background just outside the terminal entrance at the extreme top left of the entrance.
Note his or her shadow being cast by the sun and how it points directly toward the closed circuit television camera (CCTV)
filming the alleged hijacker inside the terminal. Note also the angle of the pedestrian's shadow in relation to the
thick black stripe that runs along the terminal floor from right below the CCTV and straight to the metal detector.
Keep all this in mind as you scroll down. 
At
right is a close-up of the pedestrian outside the terminal. Again, note that his or her shadow points right at the CCTV
camera filming the alleged hijacker. For those in the "9/11 Truth Movement" who profess they cannot see
the pedestrian's shadow in this film, a series of edited photos appears in Appendix B at the end of this presentation.
Also, a link to the video on the US Courts website appears right below, and by viewing it the reader will see that many other
passersby were also casting shadows from the sun in this timeframe right outside the main terminal entrance.
To see the US Department
of Justice Exhibit "Surveillance videotape from Dulles Airport West Security Checkpoint #1" click: and then scroll down to Exhibit NT00211 and click for download.
 Now, we turn to Google Earth
for a lesson in geography which will enable us to put the pedestrian's shadow in the right perspective. At left is a
satellite photo of Washington Dulles International Airport from 36,000 feet. The two main runways are parallel and go
north/south, or, at headings of 10° and 190°. (These headings are painted in white at the ends of the runways
in aviation shorthand 1L and 1R (one left and one right) for jets approaching from the south on a 10° heading and 19L
and 19R (nineteen left and nineteen right) for jets approaching from the north on a 190° heading.) Note the airline
terminals situated between the two parallel runways right below the highway traffic oval highlighted in yellow.
 In a closer Google Earth
image at left, from 13,000 feet, you have a better view of the airport terminals in between the parallel main runways.
The north and south faces of these terminals are perpendicular to the main parallel runways and therefore they run at headings
of 100° eastward and 280° westward. As you are about to see, this is an important consideration with regard
to the pedestrian's shadow and its angle relative to the thick black stripe on the terminal floor. In the photo below,
you have a good profile view of the original Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport as seen from the west
and facing east. Since the photo was taken circa 1963 by Donald Corner and Jenny
Young (permission pending from Artifice Images), wings have been added to this historic structure. Note that the line in the sidewalk is at a 100° heading, that
all the entrances face north, and that there is not enough room on the sidewalk to add an entrance facing east at a 100°
heading. 
 Now let us make a quick
study of the Dulles Airport terminals. As you can see on the terminal map reprinted at right from the Metropolitan Washington
Airports Authority website, the flow of ground passengers for departing flights from Dulles is from north to south, and south
to north for those who have arrived on flights from other airports. Please note that the terminal map is upside down,
showing the south at top and the north at bottom. For a better view of the terminal map, click here: Please
note that interior and exterior construction and renovation have been done since 9/11, but none of this changed the approach
from the north of ground passengers to their departing flights. The access road Saarinen Circle directly adjacent to
the north face of the main terminal at Dulles Airport makes this abundantly clear.
 So you see, in this Google
Earth view of the Dulles Airport terminals from 4,770 feet in the photo at left, the Main Terminal at the center top
is where ground passengers arrive for departing flights. The access road Saarinen Circle leads them there, where they
enter the main terminal on the north side, and then proceed by foot, moving walkways, shuttle lounges or shuttle buses to
their departure gates at the two mid-field terminals. The east, south and west sides of the Main Terminal are adjacent
to airport operations areas where passengers do not enter or exit. One mid-field terminal is seen in the lower center
of the photo, and the other is at the bottom edge of the photo.
 And so, one may conclude,
subject to verification in a proper judicial discovery process, that if the north face of the Main Terminal runs perpendicularly to the two main parallel runways 1/19L and 1/19R, then
the black stripe painted onto the terminal floor is exactly parallel with the runways as it is also clearly perpendicular
to the north face of the terminal. From this one may also conclude that if indeed the passengers for departing flights
enter the Main Terminal on its north side, then the shadow of the pedestrian just outside the terminal entrance, which points
directly at the CCTV giving us the image, is on a southward heading of approximately 170° or 180° relative to the
thick black stripe on a heading of 190°. Naomi C. Klaus, Associate General Counsel of the Metropolitan Washington
Airports Authority, has confirmed in her 5 January 2011 reply to my query that "Passengers entering the terminal to catch
flights come in on the north side of the terminal. On September 11, 2001, passengers going to the gates to board airplanes
would have walked south through the security checkpoints. At that time, there was a video camera facing north focused
on lane 1."  From
all of the foregoing we may conclude that the shadow of the passerby is cast from a direction where the sun never shines relative
to Washington Dulles International Airport. The sun would have to be setting in the northwest in order to cast the shadow
seen in the CCTV image. Therefore, the CCTV video is bogus in that it could not possibly have been filmed at Dulles
and must have been filmed elsewhere and then fraudulently presented as having been filmed at Dulles Airport on the morning
of 9/11. The terminal entrance where the alleged hijackers
allegedly entered had to have been facing east for the pedestrian's shadow to be true to the time and place of the event purportedly
shown in the video. However, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority has confirmed that there was no entrance facing east which the alleged hijackers could have used to enter the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles
International Airport on the morning of 11 September 2001. Even if such an eastern entrance existed at that time, there
would still be problems with the surveillance tape and its dubious depiction of shadows making a crazy sundial effect.
This matter has now been addressed in Appendix C at the end of this presentation and may very well be useful for probing the
state of mind and methods of the true perpetrators. Given
that there is no time indicator shown in the video, and given the strong prima facie
case that the video was not filmed at Washington Dulles International Airport, one must consider the strong liklihood that
certain officials within the US Department of Justice obstructed justice by a calculated presentation of fabricated evidence.
Whatever the case, it is perfectly clear that we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers
and alleged hijackers at ANY of the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed. How can
this be explained? Billions of people around the world repeatedly saw a video of two alleged terrorists passing through
a metal detector, but few know that this propaganda film was made at Portland Maine International Airport and not at Boston's
Logan International Airport. This Portland video, and the bogus "Dulles Airport" video, are all we have as
evidence! How can this be explained? How could we have invaded Afghanistan and Iraq without even asking these
questions first?
 Again, these conclusions
are tentative in that they are subject to verification in a proper judicial discovery process. Although I have not had an opportunity to verify the presented data by direct inspection and interviews with airport
authorities, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority has kindly established that on 11 September 2011 the video surveillance
camera at "West Security Checkpoint #1" faced north and passengers walked south through this checkpoint before heading
to the gates for their flights. This information from an authoritative source gives a reliable framework in which to
analyse the passerby's shadow seen outside the terminal entrance. Basic astronomy takes care of the rest. The
shadow does not comport with the given scenario, and would not do so under any circumstances at any time at the latitude and
longitude of Washington Dulles International Airport in Herndon, Virginia.  This presentation ought to be the starting point for a new and real investigation
of 1) the shock & awe doctrine; 2) the events of 9/11; and 3) the cover-up of 9/11. Let the truth be told, and let
justice be done! This remains to be done, perhaps under the aegis of a 9/11 International Independent Investigation
Commission established and supported by the United Nations, if not by the United States Government itself. The pursuit
of 9/11 truth and justice will very likely have real peace as a collateral benefit. © Stephen M. St. John 2009, 2010, 2011 ARTICLE RETRACTED
4
June 2013
*********************************************************************************************************************************** Appendix
A Correspondence and other Notes
On 21 October
2009, after nearly two months of intermittent faxing and emailing Dulles Airport Shadow casts
Doubt on US Government's 9/11 conspiracy Theory, I made a personal visit to the New York Regional Office of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation at 26 Federal Plaza on Broadway at Duane Street in Manhattan, less than half a mile from ground zero.
There, according to procedure, I completed and deposited a handwritten notice that referred to this article in particular
and the need for a new and a real investigation of 9/11 in general. After a rather strange
but interesting twist, I now note that on 19 October 2009 I emailed the Director of the FBI's New York Regional Office, Joseph
Demarest, Jr., at ny1@ic.fbi.gov and gave him a notification of my discovery of the bogus "Dulles Airport" video
surveillance tape, a link to this article as well as advice that I intended to visit the regional office on 21 October from
approximately 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM and hoped to meet him in person to discuss this matter. It so happened that the very
next day, 20 October 2009, President Obama made a sudden and unexpected visit to the New York Regional Office of the FBI,
ostensibly to give awards to agents who had ferreted out certain evildoers. Be that as it may, when I arrived the next
day, I did not get beyond the security in the lobby, but was presented instead with a form on which to write my information.
I was invited to sit at a table in the Federal Building's employee cafeteria and returned from there to drop the completed
form into a secure drawer such as the kind you might see at a bank. Of course I was tempted to think that the President
of the USA was apprised of my discovery, but cannot be sure. Whatever, the conspiracy of silence and the shunning remain
in place. (This update made 21 July 2010 and corrected on 22 October 2010 as to President Obama's visit of 20 October
2009 NOT 2010.) ***********************************************************************************************************************************
Emailed
letter to Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder and Inspector General Glenn A. Fine, dated 26 October 2009:
Mr. Eric Holder, Attorney General of the USA Mr. Glenn Fine Inspector General, US Department of Justice Dear Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Inspector General, I write to urge you to examine my discovery of a bogus Dulles Airport
video surveillance tape used to frame Arabs for the shock and awe crimes of 9/11, as set forth below in my article entitled
Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 conspiracy Theory. This strong evidence of a major
fraud perpetrated from within the ranks of the US Department of Justice is but one of many, many reasons to conduct a new
and a real investigation of 9/11, including the cover-up and the possibly underlying "shock and awe" doctrine.
I am at your service to conduct such an investigation. My contact information also follows. Very truly yours, Stephen M. St. John Post
Office Box 449 Rockefeller Center New York, New York
10185 212 534 5024 *******************************************************************************************************************
Follow-up
letter by email to the Attorney General and the Inspector General, dated 27 October 2009:
Eric Holder Attorney General of the USA Glenn Fine Inspector General of the US Department of Justice et alii Dear Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Inspector General, In the spirit of Abraham Lincoln, who once said "It is true that you may fool all of the people
some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time,"
I send this request for a response to yesterday's message, which follows: I
write to urge you to examine my discovery of a bogus Dulles Airport video surveillance tape used to frame Arabs for the shock
and awe crimes of 9/11, as set forth below in my article entitled Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's
9/11 conspiracy Theory. This strong evidence of a major fraud perpetrated from within the ranks of the US Department
of Justice is but one of many, many reasons to conduct a new and a real investigation of 9/11, including the cover-up and
the possibly underlying "shock and awe" doctrine. I am at your service to conduct such an investigation.
My contact information also follows. I close with an old adage which George W. Bush famously botched: Fool me once, shame on you; fool
me twice, shame on me. Very truly yours, Stephen
M. St. John Post Office Box 449 Rockefeller Center New York, New York 10185 212 534 5024 ***************************************************************************************************
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449 New York, NY 10185
Honorable Loretta Preska United States District Court, SDNY 500 Pearl Street, Room 12A New York, New York 10007-1312
31 December 2009 Dear Judge Preska, I hereby renew and reiterate my claim of an award for
having exposed the frame-up and cover-up of 9/11, which claim I made in a fax broadcast to you and the missions to the United
Nations here in New York City on 4 December 2009. As a federal judge you are obligated to prevent fraud and force, and you can refer to my
fax broadcast now published on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html where you scroll to 4 December. My
boss, Marian Britton, who was the Assistant New York Regional Director of the Census Bureau at 26 Federal Plaza, was on United
Airlines flight 93 on 9/11, and my misgivings about the official story of 9/11 began with the realization that airport surveillance
videos of her or of any of the other passengers or hijackers were not made available to anyone under any circumstances. Another Census Bureau colleague witnessed and described
to me the bizarre approach of United flight 175 over New York harbor, which I later discovered could not have been accomplished
even by a top gun pilot, and therefore could only have been done by remote control. Now I'm showing you that a purported Dulles Airport
video surveillance tape, used as evidence by the US Government, is as phony as Osama Bin Laden's videotaped messages to the
world. Please see http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html. Please do not join the
conspiracy of silence! I'd very much like to meet with you to discuss what can and should be done. Very truly yours, Stephen M. St. John *************************************************************************************************** The day after Zacharias Moussaoui lost his appeal, I sent the following email
to his court-appointed attorney, Justin Antonipillai, and a letter by regular mail to the Chief Judge of the 4th Circuit Court
of Appeals, William B. Traxler, Jr..
Justin S.
Antonipillai Dear Mr. Antonipillai, I believe my investigation and analysis of the airport
video used in the original Zacharias Moussaoui trial shows fraud on the part of the US Government, and for that reason alone
the 2006 verdict should be overturned and a new trial ordered. There you will find the link
to my article, Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. Inasmuch as a version of
this video was also used to promote the release of the 9/11 Commission Report on 22 July 2004, I believe my finding demands
a new and a real investigation of what really happened on 9/11. I believe Zacharias Moussaoui is just an unfortunate pawn on the Grand Chessboard. With kind regards, Stephen M. St. John Post
Office Box 449 Rockefeller Center New
York, New York 10185 **************************************************************************************************** Stephen
M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York 10185
5
January 2010
Chief Judge William B. Traxler, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
1100
East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Judge Traxler,
Regarding
the case of Zacharias Moussaoui, I have discovered in the course of my own independent research that the purported Dulles
Airport video surveillance tape, which our government presented as evidence in the original trial, is a fraud. Basic
astronomy and geometry prove my point. And so I urge you to read my article, Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt on US
Government's 9/11 Conspiracy Theory, on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html.
I became more than curious on this subject upon realization that there were no airport video surveillance images
of any of the passengers or hijackers at Newark's Liberty International Airport and Boston's Logan International Airport on
the morning of 11 September 2001. My boss, Marion Britton, the Assistant New York Regional Director of the Bureau of
the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, was on United Airlines flight 93 out of Newark. I know I never saw Marion again.
Beyond that, most of what I've heard and read on 9/11 I find unbelievable.
You are bound by your oath of
office to prevent fraud and force in our courts. Therefore, I appeal to your conscience and ask you to take the initiative
to verify my findings regarding the purported Dulles Airport video tape, and then take appropriate action based on this new
information.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id97.html ****************************************************************************************************** ARTICLE
RETRACTED
4 June 2013
Appendix
B
Edited Photo Gallery Pedestrian in background
gives away the game, and exposes the praxis of evil in our midst.
Below is a close-up of the pedestrian
casting shadow.
Aerial photo below from Google
Earth gives north/south orientation of runway headings (10° and 190°) and east/west orientation of the north and
south sides of the airport terminals (100° and 280°) with north at top, south at bottom, east at right and west at
left.
In the next two photos below,
the north/south faces of the airport terminal structures are shown to be perpendicular to the main runways, and the direction
of arrivals of ground passengers for departing flights is clearly shown to be from the north side of the Main Terminal, where
the auto traffic oval is located. The east, south and west sides of the Main Terminal are adjacent to airport operations
areas where passengers do not enter or exit. They enter and exit at the north side of the Main Terminal only.
Below is a closer view of the
main terminal to the north and the two mid-field terminals south of it. Passengers enter all three of these terminals
from the north side.
 In the next two photos, the thick
black stripe running on the ground from the door to the camera is parallel to the main runways on a heading of 190° if
this photo is indeed from an authentic Dulles Airport video surveillance camera. It would then follow that the yellow
line is very nearly on an exact north to south heading of 180° from outside the entrance to the camera inside. And
this is the direction of the shadow cast by the passerby. The only problem is, the sun does not cast its shadow from
north to south. Therefore, this video is bogus. It was filmed elsewhere and then fraudulently presented as having
been filmed at Dulles Airport by agents of the US Government and perhaps others in order to frame the Arabs for 9/11.
This deception could not have been accidental. This fraud could only have been perpetrated with foreknowledge of 9/11
and it is one of many components of an action plan to establish a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and neighboring states.
 The sun is a reliable witness,
and basic astronomy and geometry give the proof. This presentation ought to be the starting point for a new and real
investigation of 1) the shock & awe doctrine; 2) the events of 9/11; and 3) the cover-up of 9/11. Let the truth
be told, and let justice be done!
Somewhere along the chain of custody
of evidence for this video surveillance tape (exhibit NT00211 at the 2006 Zacharias Moussaoui trial) is the link to the treasonous
praxis of evil in our midst! By what authority did the South Carolina law firm Motley Rice LLC make a version of this
tape available to the Associated Press to promote the release of the 9/11 Commission Report the next day, 22 July 2004?
And by the way -- not to change the subject -- I'd like to know the whereabouts of Admiral Michael Mullen on 9/11! *************************************************************************************************************************************************
ARTICLE RETRACTED
4 June 2013
Appendix C The Crazy Sundial Effect or, Problems
arising from Consideration of a supposed Entrance facing East at Washington Dulles International Airport on the morning of 11 September 2001 shortly after sunrise. Please note that on 5 January 2011 the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority confirmed that passengers going
to their flights enter the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport on the north side of the building only.
Therefore, Appendix C becomes an academic exercise only after the existence of a terminal entrance facing east has finally
been ruled out. However, this Appendix C may very well be of value in probing the state of mind and methodology of the
real perpetrators of 9/11.
Examination
of photos available in the public domain do not show any entrances facing east at the Main Terminal of Washington Dulles International
Airport. Aerial photos from Google Earth show that the east, south and west sides of
the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport are adjacent to airport operations areas where passengers do
not enter or exit. Passengers do enter and exit on the north side only. However, there are no entrances to be
found facing east on the north side of the Main Terminal. Below is a Google Earth 3D
view looking south at the north face of the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport. There is not a
hint of an entrance facing east.
And from the Metropolitan
Washington Airports Authority website we have this photo (below) of the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport
as seen from the northwest. Bear in mind that the US Department of Justice Trial Exhibit "Surveillance videotape
from Dulles Airport West Security Checkpoint#1" allegedly comes from the near end of the Main Terminal building as seen
in this photo. But there is no sign of an entrance facing east anywhere along the north face of the terminal! And below is another Google Earth 3D image as seen from northwest
by west. Again, there is no entrance facing east along the north face of the Dulles Main Terminal.
Below is a still from a TV broadcast on the evening of 21 July 2004, the night before the publisher's
release of the 9/11 Commission Report. It shows the Main Terminal at Washington
Dulles International Airport from the northwest. The roadway runs eastward at a 100° heading, and the entrances
to the Main Terminal face north. There is no indication of any entrance facing east. In the image below, you have a good profile view of the original Main Terminal at Washington Dulles
International Airport as seen from the west and facing east at a 100° heading. Since this photo was taken circa
1963 by Donald Corner and Jenny Young (permission pending from Artifice Images), wings have been added to this historic structure.
Note that the line in the sidewalk is at a 100° heading, that all the entrances face north and that there is not enough
room on the sidewalk to add an entrance facing east at a 100° heading. Yet the only plausible explanation
of the sun's shadows cast by passersby in the far background of the purported "Dulles Airport" video surveillance
tape would be if the entrance were indeed facing east. So, without any indication of an entrance facing east, and without
any accountability from our government on this point, and without a proper judicial discovery process to resolve the issue, let's pretend there was such an entrance facing east at
Washington Dulles International Airport through which the alleged hijackers allegedly passed before boarding the ill-fated
American Airlines Flight 77. As we shall see below, even if there were such an entrance facing east, close analysis of the purported "Dulles
Airport" video surveillance tape reveals deep problems with the shadows cast by the sun. These shadows are only
superficially plausible. A closer look shows a crazy sundial effect.  Since we know that the main parallel runways are at 10°
and 190° headings, and that the north face of the Main Terminal is perpendicular to the runways, we also know that the
north face of the Main Terminal extends at 100° and 280° headings. Facing east at a 100° heading, as seen
in the Corner-Young photo above, we turn to the ingenious Stellarium software program to study the motion of the rising sun and the shadows that we can expect to see. In
the Stellarium images shown below, the setting is for Herndon, Virginia, which is the location of Washington Dulles International
Airport at N 38° 58' 12.00" W 77° 23' 24.00". For demonstration purposes, Stellarium functions as
a planetarium as seen from Washington Dulles International Airport on the early morning of 11 September 2001. (The green
field is a default setting depicting the environs of Guéreins in the valley of the Saône river, 50 km north of
Lyon, France. Guéreins is where Fabian Chéreau created Stellarium. Just west of Guéreins
stand the Alpine foothills of the "Beaujolais" where the famous wine is produced.) For the present purpose,
the 100° heading of the azimuthal grid serves as the north edge of the Dulles Airport Main Terminal as seen in profile
from west of the terminal and looking east. Once the sun passes the 100° heading, the north face of the terminal
is totally in shadow. Without a graphics artist at my disposal, I cannot place the terminal building in the picture.
This must be left for the reader's imagination at least for the time being.
The
Stellarium image below shows morning twilight as seen from Washington Dulles International Airport on 11 September 2001.
The red letter E for East is at a 90° heading and the next line to the right of it marks the 100° heading. This
100° heading coincides with the north face of the Main Terminal as seen sideways from the west and looking east.
Again, the reader must imagine the terminal building's being there until a competent graphics artist comes to my rescue.
Stellarium shows the bright stars Sirius and Procyon as well as the planet Venus as they begin to fade away in the solar glare.  The Stellarium image
below was taken just minutes before sunrise at Washington Dulles International Airport on 11 September 2001. At this
point in time, the disc of the sun is just below the horizon near the line marking the 80° heading, which is to the left
of the 90° heading bearing the red E for East.
The Stellarium image
below shows sunrise at Washington Dulles International Airport on 11 September 2001. The solar disc makes its initial
appearance at an approximately 84° heading. As you are about to see, the earth spinning round makes the sun move
diagonally toward the south as it rises in the sky. Before the sun reaches 10° above the horizon, it will have gone
nearly 10° southward too, from an approximately 84° heading to an approximately 93° heading. As a result
of this diagonal rising of the sun, in a matter of minutes shadows shorten and shift northwards. The Stellarium image below
shows the approximate time (7:18AM) when the first two alleged hijackers, Majed Moqed and Khaled Mihdhar, allegedly arrived
at the alleged security checkpoint at "Dulles Airport."
The image below shows a shadow cast by the sun off a passerby in the same time-frame as the alleged
Moqed-Mihdhar arrival at the "Dulles Airport" security checkpoint.
The Stellarium image
below shows the position of the sun at the approximate time (7:39AM) the image of the passerby's shadow was taken, which was
just a few minutes after the alleged arrivals of the other three alleged hijackers, Hani Hanjour, Salem and Nawaf al-Hazmi,
at the alleged security checkpoint at "Dulles Airport," and about twenty minutes after the alleged arrival of the
first two alleged hijackers. In this twenty minute interval, one would expect to see a shortening and shifting northwards
of the shadows.
 The image below is that of the passerby shortly after the alleged
arrivals of Hanjour and the Al-Hazmi brothers at the "Dulles Airport" security checkpoint and about twenty minutes
after the earlier alleged arrival of the first two alleged hijackers Moqed and Mihdhar. In comparison with the shadow
photographed twenty minutes earlier, this shadow shows neither a shortening nor a shifting northwards (to the left) which
one would expect to see as the rising sun inclines to the south (to the right). Indeed, it appears that the opposite
is true, howsoever slight the difference may be. This is the crazy sundial effect.
Are the officials at the US Department of Justice, or the company they keep, clever enough to stop the motion of the sun? The Stellarium
image below shows the sun after it has moved past the 100° mark of the azimuthal grid, at which point the north face of
the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport is in complete shadow. Were it not for the fact that the US Department of Justice condensed an approximately
twenty minute interval into two whole segments totaling less than six minutes of video, there would be many more shadows to
study for confirming or ruling out their expected steady progression of shortening and shifting northwards. Barring
a proper judicial discovery process, such a study of the entire video tape is not possible. Without a proper judicial discovery process, a shadow of doubt compromises the integrity of the US Department of Justice Exhibit NT00211, the "Surveillance videotape
from Dulles Airport West Security Checkpoint #1." Perhaps this
videotape came off the rack from the untold and unfathomable terabytes of the Pentagon's "Able Danger" project or
from another project of some such agency and were conveniently available to the evildoers so as to frame "likely suspect"
Arabs and justify an otherwise unjustifiable invasion and occupation in the Middle East. But like most suits bought
off the rack, their selection was not perfectly tailored and the faults are obvious to a discriminating eye. The Emperor
wears a cheap suit! This exercise with the help of Stellarium software presupposes a passenger entrance
facing east at Washington Dulles International Airport. But such a presupposition is doubtful and without a proper judicial discovery process, will remain in doubt. The "Dulles Airport" shadow continues to cast doubt on the US Government's 9/11 conspiracy
theory that 19 Arab hijackers fooled a high tech multi-layered security system, defied the laws of physics, and even made
the sun rise in the northwest (if you accept that the passenger entrance at Dulles Airport faced north) or, better yet, made
the sun stand still (if you accept that the passenger entrance at Dulles Airport faced east). Please note that on 5 January 2011 the Metropolitan Washington Airports
Authority confirmed that passengers going to their flights enter the Main Terminal at Washington Dulles International Airport
on the north side of the building only. Therefore, Appendix C becomes an academic exercise only now that the existence
of a terminal entrance facing east has finally been ruled out. However, this Appendix C may very well be of value
in probing the state of mind and methodology of the real perpetrators of 9/11. In the meantime, a more certain, concise
and cutting version of this article can now be read at http://www.show-the-house.com/id107.html. This is still an investigation
and a work in progress (18 February 2011).
© Stephen
M. St. John 2009 © Stephen M. St. John 2010 © Stephen
M. St. John 2011 stephen@show-the-house.com ARTICLE RETRACTED
4 June 2013
|
