SOMETHING
BIG IS MISSING FROM JOHN DURHAM'S RUSSIAGATE PROBE
SAN
JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA, 12 JANUARY 2022 * * * Special Counsel John Durham's Russiagate inquiry will set the stage
for political theatre leading up to the USA's mid-term elections in November as well as the 2024 national elections.
January 6th Crusaders and Fake British Dossier Victimologists will very likely make all the noise. However, Durham carefully avoids unspeakable
matters touching on the USA's warmongering foreign policy of fraud and force particularly in the Middle East.
The purview of Durham's mandate entails
an obligation to take full stock of the hunter and the hunted; namely, then-Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III and then-President
Donald J. Trump, whose paths had already converged right after the Shock & Awe attacks of 11 September 2001,
15 years before Russiagate. Durham has not done this!
Robert Mueller was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on
11 September 2001, and therefore presided over the subsequent investigations including those at the sealed-off and closely
guarded crime scene known as Ground Zero at New York City's World Trade Center. And Donald Trump,
lo and behold, said to the German TV Channel Nachrichten 24 on 13 September 2001 that he had about 225 of his men assigned
to Ground Zero in order to "get rid of what's there"! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c)
How unspeakable
it is! The US Government, the news media, pulpits, and even the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement"
have placed walls of silence and of shunning around this all important issue so that voters cannot even formulate basic questions
arising from Trump's utterances. What is the difference between Mueller's duty to collect and evaluate
evidence at Ground Zero and Trump's mission to "get rid of what's there"? Was the presence
of Trump and his 225 men at Ground Zero an infiltration or a collaboration or what? Durham seems
hardly a step ahead of our unenlightened electorate in this regard. No credibility leads to no legitimacy.
Does the Talmudic
law of the Moser (informer), whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or
indirectly, apply to the loose lips of a Zionist stooge? Did the Zionists benefit from 9/11?
Trump's Zionist Buddy Benjamin Netanyahu has said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel."
Trump's other Zionist Buddy and New York City neighbor, Larry Silverstein, had a really gratifying golden shower after
a 49-day countdown from his first insurance premium on 24 July 2001 for his newly acquired World Trade Center.
Trump's state of mind while working
in Mueller's FBI turf at Ground Zero can be ascertained from his WWOR TV interview that earlier took place by phone
within hours of the attacks on 11 September 2001. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w) Trump purposefully lied about the structures of the World Trade Center Twin Towers by indicating that they lacked central
core columns and that they had been built "just like a can of soup." This false and misleading
statement from the foremost authority on big building construction laid the foundation for the equally false and misleading
"pancaking" theory of collapse, whereby only the jet hits, the resultant fires, and gravity brought the towers down
as fast as an apple dropped from the roof. So it was clearly a Prime Purveyor of Fake News and his 225
men that were at Ground Zero to "get rid of what's there."
AERIAL PHOTO AT RIGHT SHOWS WORLD TRADE CENTER NORTH TOWER (WTC 1) UNDER CONSTRUCTION
IN 1969. NOTE THE INNER CORE STEEL COLUMNS, WHICH LOOK LIKE A TOWER INSIDE A TOWER. THIS VIEW HARDLY SUGGESTS
THE BUILDING WAS DESIGNED "JUST LIKE A CAN OF SOUP" ACCORDING TO THE ARCH-DECEIVER DONALD J. TRUMP! THE THEN-FUTURE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SERVED AS A FAKE-NEWS COMPONENT OF THE 9/11 INSIDE JOB TO FRAME AND BLAME ARAB SEMITES AND
MOSLEMS AND START STILL ONGOING WARS AGAINST THEM AS OF OCTOBER 2022! [UPDATE: On 26 October 2022, this video,
which has been continuously available on the Internet since at least December 2017, when I discovered it, was found to have
been "removed for violating You Tube's policy on hate speech." How bizarre! You Tube's censors have
lost their minds. There is no hate here. This is suppression of evidence in the court of public opinion.
Well, at least I leave you, the reader, with the transcript below. -SSJ]
If John Durham were to shine a light on this strange Trump-Mueller association
at Ground Zero, elements of very serious crimes will start to fall into place. By comparison,
the fake dossier on Trump, Mueller's investigation of Trump, and Durham's investigation of Mueller's investigation are distractions
that pervert the course of justice with respect to 9/11.
The Shock & Awe attacks of 11 September 2001 were a false flag
military intelligence black operation to frame and blame Arab Semites and Moslems and to fabricate a pretext for wars in the
Middle East. Controlled demolitions, cybernetic telecommunications piracy (such as remote control of the
attacking jets and electronic impersonations on phones and radios), and fake news along with information control by the publishing
and broadcast industries were the methods used by the real perpetrators of these heinous crimes. Trump's
own words from his own mouth clearly make him a key participant in this bloody and lucrative adventure that killed or made
homeless millions of Arab Semites and Moslems.
The United States Department of Justice has no excuse for ignoring this writer's accusations against
Donald Trump. Its leaders, among others, have been told repeatedly ever since February 2018.
Their pattern of avoidance of these grave matters for four years is tantamount to obstruction of justice.
As King Solomon put it, "A wicked
doer gives heed to false lips; and a liar gives ear to a mischievous tongue." (Proverbs: 17:4) Isn't it time
to look within ourselves and change our ways? And as United States Embassy hostage in Tehran Moorhead Kennedy
asked after his 444 day ordeal in 1981, "We know what they have done to us; what have we been doing to them?"
Perhaps a good dose of honesty with Kennedy's Platinum Corollary of the Golden Rule will end the plague of
violence in the UK and the USA. Isn't it worth a try to reverse the curse?
Under the 1945 Nuremberg Principles,
Trump and his co-conspirators should be tried for crimes against peace, which led to actual war crimes and crimes against
humanity. Our divided nation seems to be united by the Big Lie of 9/11. Might it be
that things will improve if we see truth and justice unite to remove the warmongers and their ilk? Such
a worthy goal can be achieved at an International 9/11 Nuremberg Principles Tribunal. Otherwise, the strong
delusion about 9/11 will persist at our peril.
For easy reference, a copy of the Nuremberg Principles appears right below, followed by
transcripts of the two Trump interviews cited above, as well as the author's résumé. A more
detailed exposition of the Trump-Mueller 9/11 problem can be found in the introduction to his eBook, Lifting the Burdens
of Falsehood & Deceit: Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey & Eric H. Holder,
Jr., which anyone can read in English at http://www.show-the-house.com/id130.html.
Stephen M. St. John
* * *
Nuremberg Principles
Principle I
Any person who commits
an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
Principle II
The fact that internal law does not impose
a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from
responsibility under international law.
Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted
as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
Principle IV
The fact that a person
acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law,
provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
Principle
V
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts
and law.
Principle VI
The crimes
hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace: (i) Planning, preparation,
initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not
limited to, murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave-labour or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in
occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public
or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and
other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such
acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war
crime.
Principle VII
Complicity
in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime
under international law.
*
* *
Nachrichten 24
Interview with Donald J. Trump
13 September 2001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c
TRANSCRIPT
Stephan
Bachenheimer (SB): Mr. Trump, do you have any interest in the area down there that’s been affected?
Donald Trump (DT): “I have a lot of property down there but it wasn’t,
fortunately, affected by what happened to the World Trade Center.”
SB:
What’s your biggest fear, Mr. Trump?
DT: Well, I just went to what
they call Ground Zero. I’ve never seen anything like it – the devastation, the human
life that has been just wasted for no reason whatsoever, ah, it is a terrible scene, a terrible sight, but New Yorkers are
very strong and resilient and they will rebuild quickly.
SB: Mr. Trump, what
should be the response to this attack? How should the US respond to such a devastation?
DT:
Well, I think they have to respond quickly and effectively. They have to find out exactly what the
cause was, who did it, and they have to go after these people because there is no other choice. And then,
secondarily and much less importantly, we have to rebuild in some form that will be just as majestic as the World Trade Center.
SB: Will you be involved, will you take any efforts, any steps, to reconstruct the
area?
DT: Well, I HAVE A LOT OF MEN DOWN HERE RIGHT NOW; WE HAVE OVER A HUNDRED AND WE HAVE
ABOUT ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE COMING, so we’ll have a couple of hundred people down here, and they’re
very brave and what they’re doing is amazing, and we will be involved in some form in helping to reconstruct.
SB: What kind of cost would you estimate to rebuild this area? How
much money has been lost in the attack?
DT: I would say fifteen to twenty billion
dollars. You’re talking billions and billions of dollars, and it’s irreparable.
Irreparable. But I really feel that the location is such, and THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MONUMENT
IS SUCH, that we have to rebuild. And again, not necessarily in the form of the two towers, but
something has to be done that’s very big and very majestic.
SB: A lot of
people ask, how is it possible that a Boeing plane would be able to destroy the, or two planes, would be able to destroy the
Twin Towers? Because they were constructed to withstand, like a 707 attack.
DT:
It’s tremendous power and tremendous heat, and people were willing to die, and when they’re willing to
die, and when they’re willing to become kamikazes of a sense, there’s very little you can do about it. I
mean, the heat and the power... actually, it was amazing that the initial jolts didn’t jar the building as much as people
would have thought. But the tremendous amounts of fuel that was dumped on the building, and 1600 degrees
temperature, I guess that’s probably more than anything can take, no matter what.”
SB:
When do you think you will start to rebuild?
DT: Well, I would hope it would really be very
quickly, a lot of great genius people in this city, and I think that within a shorter period of time than, FIRST,
WE HAVE TO GET RID OF WHAT’S THERE, and we have to save as many lives as possible, if that is possible –
today they found five people under the rubble, which is amazing, alive -- but after that process takes place, I think they
can start thinking about rebuilding, absolutely.
SB: Viel Danke, Mr. Trump.
DT: Danke, Danke.
* * *
WWOR TV Interview
with Donald
J. Trump
11 September 2001
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w
[UPDATE: On 26 October 2022, this video, which has been continuously available on
the Internet since at least December 2017, when I discovered it, was found to have been "removed for violating You Tube's
policy on hate speech." How bizarre! You Tube's censors have lost their minds. There is no hate here.
This is suppression of evidence in the court of public opinion. Well, at least I leave you, the reader, with the transcript
below. -SSJ]
TRANSCRIPT
Alan Marcus (AM): Donald, you’re probably the best known builder – particularly
of great buildings in the city – there’s a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate
destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect or possibly by bombs or aftershocks.
Do you have any thoughts on that?
Donald Trump (DT): Well, it wasn’t
an architectural defect. You know the World Trade Center was always known as a very strong building.
Don’t forget, that took a big bomb in the basement [1993]. Now the basement is the most vulnerable
place because that’s your foundation. And it withstood that. And I got to see
that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour
because he did the building. And I said, “I can’t believe it!” The
building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. So, this was an unbelievably powerful
building. If you know anything about structure, IT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST BUILDINGS THAT WAS BUILT
FROM THE OUTSIDE. The steel – the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows
– is that in between all the windows YOU HAD THE STEEL ON THE OUTSIDE. SEE, YOU HAD THE STEEL
ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. That’s why when I first looked – and you had big,
heavy I-beams – when I first looked at it I couldn’t believe it because there was a hole in the steel, and this
is steel that was – you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center, folks? – I think, you know,
if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow and in between was this heavy steel. I said, “how
could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747, or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel?”
I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously.
Because I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall. MOST BUILDINGS
ARE BUILT WITH THE STEEL IS ON THE INSIDE AROUND THE ELEVATOR SHAFT. THIS ONE WAS BUILT FROM THE OUTSIDE,
WHICH IS THE STRONGEST STRUCTURE YOU CAN HAVE, AND IT WAS ALMOST JUST LIKE A CAN OF SOUP.
AM:
You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two.
And when you see that approach the far side, and all of a sudden, within a matter of a millisecond, the explosion pops
out the other side.
DT: Right. I just think that there was
a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously there were very big planes. They
were going very rapidly, because, I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming
down into the building, so was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me
that to do that kind of destruction, is even more than a big plane. Because you are talking about taking
out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building. These buildings were rock solid.
And, you know, it’s just an amazing, amazing thing. This country is different today.
And it’s going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.
AM:
A very profound statement, and very true.
* * *
Stephen
M. St. John
Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA 95172
stephen@show-the-house.com
● Objective:
Consultant on an International 9/11 Nuremberg Principles Tribunal to establish the truth and to pursue justice with
respect to the 11 September 2001 Shock & Awe attacks on the USA, the cover-up, and the ongoing threats of cybernetic
telecommunications piracy.
● Experience:
• President, Metatron, Los Angeles & New York, 1983 to present: Researcher and writer on
issues pertaining to foreign and domestic policies of selected nations, and devoted to achieving a truly just and comprehensive
peace on all fronts of the Iranian/Arab-Anglo/Zionist dispute, with emphasis on showing the prophesied location for the real
Israel’s next temple and a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction from the Nile to Euphrates rivers.
• Founding Associate Member, USS Liberty Veterans Association, Los Angeles & New York, 1982 to present:
Grassroots activist and correspondent pointing to the Realpolitik behind the 08 June 1967 Zionist attack on
the USS Liberty, the Zionists' nearly simultaneous and unbelievably quick ("miraculous") taking of the
Syrian Golan Heights, the cover-up, and hidden obstacles to finding comprehensive peace in the region including Syria.
• Member, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Los Angeles
& New York, 1983 to 1990: Grassroots activist and correspondent; Co-Chairman of the Media-Monitoring
Sub-Committee, Los Angeles, 1984 & 1985 and New York, 1988 & 1989; opened an Alex Odeh Assassination File in pursuit
of truth and justice regarding an ADC colleague's unsolved murder in 1985 in what appears to have been a coordinated US military
intelligence black operation.
● Achievements:
Author, Hierosolyma, An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem © Stephen M. St. John 1977:
• Features a legal mechanism for conflict resolution by territorial adjustment which is patterned
after the only provision in the Constitution of the USA never to be exercised since it took effect in 1788!
• Cites from Torah the prophesied site for Israel’s next temple, which is not the
same place where the first two temples were located on the Temple Mount or حرم
الشريف but
rather near בית אל!
• In 1993 called by the Government of Lebanon “a truly egalitarian model for consideration”!
Also: • Uncovered the alter ego of CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Jesus
Angleton, who would pose as the Anglo American poet T. S. Eliot, which indicates a British influence on efforts first to circumvent,
then to eliminate, JFK’s strong opposition to the Zionists’ nuclear weapons program! •
Uncovered Donald Trump as an accessory to the Shock & Awe attacks of 9/11 by his framing and blaming Arab
Semites with fake news in furtherance of the Praxis of Evil's plan to wage aggressive wars in the Middle East, which
is a crime that is actionable under the Nuremberg Principles of 1945! •
Published on Amazon Lifting the Burdens of Falsehood & Deceit: Open Letters on 9/11 to the
Attorneys General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey & Eric H. Holder, Jr.; the introduction of this 2018 eBook gives
facts and analysis leading to the conclusion Donald Trump was involved in the fake news component of the 9/11 "inside
job"!
● Education:
Boston College, Bachelor of Arts, cum laude, English Literature
●
Interests:
Sky watching • news watching • listening to classical music • chess • Talmud
Awareness • Internet • maintaining website at www.show-the-house.com
* * * * * * *
