9/11:
Another Look
But
this time, by a UN 9/11 Commission!
As leaders from around the world plan to converge on United Nations Headquarters in New York City
to open the new General Assembly on 23 September 2009, they should consider the establishment of a 9/11 International Independent
Investigation Commission.
The precedent for such an investigation was set at the insistence of the USA in its rush to judgment after
the assassination of Lebanon’s former Prime Minister, Rafiq Hariri, on 14 February 2005. Inasmuch
as 9/11 served as a justification for invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, surely the terrible events of that
day should not remain a mystery. Nor should an apparent 9/11 cover-up outlast the occupations.
The 9/11 Commission
Cochairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton have admitted they were “set up to fail.” Commissioner
Max Cleland quit in disgust over Bush Administration stonewalling. The 9/11 Commission Report,
issued on 22 July 2004, is riddled with distortions and omissions. The National Institute of Standards
& Technology failed to give the World Trade Center dust proper chemical analysis.
And so the 6 April 2009 announcement by University
of Copenhagen Professor of Chemistry Niels Harrit that military grade nanothermitic high explosive particles were found in
dust samples provided by four residents living near ground zero at the World Trade Center has energized the quest for a real
investigation, albeit mainly on the Internet. Violations of the code of ethics of professional journalism
black this out.
Surely a man in a cave or tent in Afghanistan did not have access to the Twin Towers and the Salomon Brothers
Building (WTC 7) to place these explosives; yet these buildings dropped at near free fall speed and in perfect accord with
all other known characteristics of controlled demolitions. So who placed the charges? Who
was at the ready to set them off after two of the three buildings had been hit by jets?
But even hard evidence uncovered by meticulous scientific
research has met resistance. Harrit’s team’s work could have been and should have been done
by the proper authorities within hours of the attacks. Yet a conspiracy of silence still reigns supreme
four months after his announcement and publication of Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World
Trade Center Catastrophe.
The upshot finally came in President Obama’s 4 June 2009 speech at the University of Cairo,
where he declared, “I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11.
But let us be clear: Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day."
Let me be clear. There is no
way I can justify 9/11. But I simply do not believe the official story told in the 9/11 Commission
Report. Conflating skepticism with justification of the events of 9/11 seems like a desperate attempt
at a sound bite to stifle debate. And so it is time for the United Nations to take the USA by the hand
and help President Obama to confront the awful bogeyman who has been exercising the military industrial complex so well.
Its “Shock & Awe” doctrine is good for purchase orders only!
I believe our nation is in moral and spiritual jeopardy
when we watch 9/11 passengers and alleged hijackers in the NBC Universal Studios movie Flight 93 but cannot see any
credible video surveillance images of any of the real passengers and alleged hijackers at any of the three high security airports
from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed. Millions if not billions of people were hoodwinked
into believing a video of two alleged hijackers passing through a metal detector at Portland Maine International Airport was
from Logan Airport in Boston. The CCTV at Washington Dulles Airport has no time indicator and, subject
to verification in a proper judicial discovery process, shows background shadows cast from a direction where the sun does
not shine. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html) A jury would relish such details.
High tech nanothermitic
explosives at the targets and routine video surveillance tapes gone missing at the airports are just the tip of the iceberg
representing many known unknowns about 9/11. Here are two more examples:
●
Two aerial vehicles – the one that hit the south tower WTC 2 and the one that hit the Pentagon – had trajectories
more like those of jet fighters or guided missiles than heavy commercial jets piloted by flight students on their maiden voyages.
Infiltration of government computer systems for the purposes of monitoring and surreptitiously intervening in operations
offers a logical explanation for such a successful operation by remote control right in the middle of multiple NORAD war games
and exercises.
● Stories of cell and air phone
calls from the hijacked jets are doubtful at best; impersonations conducted with high-tech real-time digital voice morphing
offer the most rational explanation for the calls that were received. Edward Felt’s cell phone call
from the lavatory of United Airlines Flight 93 was technically impossible to make, and here the FBI could not fudge facts
because toilets on commercial jets do not have air phones.
9/11 was largely a computer crime conducted by psychopathic
criminals.
Standard investigative practice includes careful consideration of those who had motive, means and opportunity to commit
the crime. Zionists were hell-bent on putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, and a classic false
flag military intelligence operation to provide a pretext for invasions and occupations was their ticket to success.
Benjamin Netanyahu more than once has stated that 9/11 was “good for Israel”; why, then, were his Zionist
buddies, led by master myth-maker Philip Zelikow, conducting the faulty 9/11 investigations? In September
2000, Dov Zakheim touted a “new Pearl Harbor” as a way to advance the imperial ambitions of fellow neoconservatives;
why, then, was he not examined because of his boundless influence over the command, control, communications and inventories
of our nation’s armed forces? Why did Mayor Bloomberg play down testimonies of explosions inside
the Twin Towers and his place of business, the Salomon Brothers Building, WTC 7? Ex-Judge Michael B. Mukasey
became Attorney General probably because he knows better than anyone else why Larry Silverstein’s WTC insurers are the
dogs that did not bark at the supposed intruder in the night.
When Shock and Awe yields to the dock and the law, the truth
will finally set us free!
My 2004 hypothesis that Zionists formed the nucleus of an inside job on 9/11 needs to be tested.
Among the first and certainly the best of the 9/11 researchers, Christopher Bollyn, has published his disturbing findings
at http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book. Charges of “anti-Semitism” ought not to preclude scrutiny in this matter; indeed, one happy
outcome of a real 9/11 investigation may well be a cessation of the shedding of the blood of Abraham in the Middle East.
On 27 April 1961
JFK made a speech at the Waldorf Astoria which touched on the powerful influence of secret societies. Just
weeks before his assassination in Dallas on 22 November 1963, the McClellan Committee was hearing testimony from Joe Valachi
about an organization whose very existence FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover denied. This is when the Mafioso
code of silence, omertà, became known in virtually every household in the USA. Now it is time for
the international community to grapple with a similar code of silence, the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew
from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly. This law stymied both the Warren Commission
and the 9/11 Commission. It is a sure foundation for a conspiracy of silence to obstruct justice.
This is a global problem in need of a global solution. (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.)
Pursuing justice is a very noble endeavor which often brings collateral benefits of high value.
In the case of 9/11, knowing exactly how the USA found its way into Afghanistan and Iraq is prerequisite to knowing
how to bring all the troops and mercenaries home.
Where there is no vision, the people perish:
But he that keepeth the
law, happy is he.
Solomon, Proverbs 29:18
© Stephen M. St. John 2009
See Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe:
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
See Solving 9/11: The
Deception That Changed the World: Solving 9/11: The Book:
http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book
See Dulles Airport Shadow casts Doubt
on the US Government’s 9/11 Conspiracy Theory:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id92.html
See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html
See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html
See The Talmudic Law of the Moser:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York
10185
United States of America
212 534 5024
metatron.metatron@verizon.net
