|
Text of fax broadcast:
COUNTING ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES WHEN OBAMA'S
QUALIFICATIONS ARE IN DOUBT
8 January 2009
Citizen of the USA Stephen M. St. John addresses the international
community in Washington and here in New York City, all members of the US Congress as well as other organizations and individuals,
public and private, and on this day set for a joint session of the US Congress to count the votes of the Electoral College
for the next President and Vice President of the USA, warns the Senators and Representatives that the citizenship status of
President Elect Barack Obama, and therefore his qualifications to be President of the USA, are still being challenged in the
Supreme Court of the United States.
The arguments have not been heard.
The controlling law for this
deplorable situation is Section 3 of Amendment XX of the Constitution of the United States.
It therefore behooves
all members of the US Congress to move to hold off the count of the Electoral College vote until we have proper discovery
and verification of the facts as they pertain to the applicable laws. Such discovery and verification of the facts should
occur before Inauguration Day, 20 January 2009.
The plaintiff/petitioners are not asking for the moon, but only
for basic facts which the citizens of the USA had a right to know before casting their ballots back on 4 November 2008.
Civil and then legal requests for relevant information have been stonewalled, and now public advocates Orly Taitz
(949 586 8110) and Philip J. Berg (610 662 3005) have separate petitions pending at the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Justices have conferences set for these petitions on 9 January and 16 January for case 08-570 and 23 January for
case 08A524.
Why risk a Constitutional crisis if the matter must be settled after Inauguration Day?
Why
put our national security at risk if fraud undermines the validity of the office and actions of the President of the United
States?
What harm can there be in a simple fact check just to be sure everything is copacetic?
A conspiracy
of silence will make all members of the US Congress accessories after the fact if fraud is uncovered after Inauguration Day.
Open government will make us all safe rather than sorry.
Visit www.show-the-house.com/id69.html and read letter to Chief Justice Roberts on question of Barack Obama's qualifications to be President of the USA.
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, New York 10185
http://www.show-the-house.com/
************************************************************************************************************************
LETTER
TO THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN SUPPORT OF PHILIP A. BERG'S CHALLENGE FOR DISCOVERY OF FACTS
PERTAINING TO PRESIDENT ELECT BARACK OBAMA'S TRUE CITIZENSHIP STATUS AND QUALIFICATIONS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA.
31 December 2008
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, New York 10185
212 534 5024 & 917 519 2905
metatron.metatron@verizon.net
www.show-the-house.com
31 December 2008
Chief Justice John G. Roberts
The Supreme Court of the
United States
1 First Street NE
Washington, DC 20543
Dear Chief Justice Roberts,
I write both to express my support for Philip J. Berg, whose case number 08-570, Berg v Obama, is set for conferences on
9 & 16 January 2009, and to urge you to regard this case as a matter of great moment and urgency and requiring a pro-active
stance to meet unusual circumstances.
Mr. Berg is a selfless individual acting in the best interests of our nation
so that the rule of law prevails. He is a knowledgeable and capable advocate driven by faith and conviction, and seems
only to have gained momentum after pausing to bury his dear brother Norman earlier this month.
Yet the high noon
appointment on 20 January 2009, when the new term of our next President begins, is fast approaching and Mr. Berg's arguments,
based on facts and laws pertaining to the citizenship status and qualifications of the President Elect, Barack Obama, to be
President, have still not been heard!
The controlling law for this deplorable situation is Section 3 of Amendment
XX of our Constitution.
Simple discovery and verification of facts as they pertain to laws of citizenship and basic
qualifications to be President of the USA have been unfairly stonewalled in many ways. For this deficiency we risk a
Constitutional crisis where a usurper compromises by his fraud the validity of his actions as President of the United States.
There is no higher priority for our nation than to be sure that this does not happen!
To prevent such a dangerous
condition, I urge that you go beyond the usual review of the lower court case, which is hooked on the issue of proper standing,
and go right to the kernel of Mr. Berg's argument on the laws and facts pertaining to Barack Obama's citizenship status and
qualifications to be President.
Mr. Berg's supererogation in a very grave matter touching on our national security
fills a vast void left by officials whose duty it is to address matters of qualifications of candidates for office.
So when the vagaries of partisan politics blunt the plain, intended effect of the Constitution of the USA, and a champion
of the people arises to enforce elementary components of this basic social contract, he deserves an attentive, benevolent
and docile audience on our highest bench.
Senate Resolution 511, which then Senator Barack Obama signed, confirmed
the status of John McCain as a "natural born citizen" of the USA who is eligible, under Article II, Section 1, to
be President. This resolution suggests that Section 5 of Article I ("Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections,
Returns and Qualifications of its own members") includes senators and representatives who become candidates for the US
Presidency. If Berg doesn't have proper standing to demonstrate how the US Senate was remiss in its collective duty
to monitor one of its very own, then who does?
More broadly, Article VI of our Constitution states that "The
Senators and Representatives … shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution." Supporting
this Constitution implies seeing that there is no doubt whatsoever that any candidate for the Presidency of the USA is indeed
a "natural born citizen" and therefore eligible to be President. The US Senate did not do this. The
US House of Representatives did not do this. Philip J. Berg is doing this.
Where partisan politics threatens
to smother due process of the law and allow fraud and force to prevail, shouldn't we consider that "The enumeration in
the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"?
Amendment IX of our Constitution denies any attempt to seal hermetically Philip J. Berg from the supreme Law of our Land and
blunt his noble endeavor to preserve, protect and defend our Constitution when others have failed to follow the law.
Citizens of the USA are directly connected to the Constitution of the USA and have a compelling interest in seeing that it
is respected and followed by all, especially by one who intends to make the solemn affirmation prescribed for Presidents on
20 January 2009.
Stephen M. St. John
Copies to:
Chief Justice John Roberts
Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia
Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
Associate Justice David H. Souter
Associate Justice John Paul Stevens
Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer
Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg
Philip J. Berg, Esquire   *************************************************************************************************************************
LETTER TO SECRETARY OF STATE RICE & SECRETARY OF STATE DESIGNATE CLINTON
11 December
2008
Dear Secretary of State Rice & Secretary of State Designate Clinton,
This is to advise both
of you that the Government of Indonesia is ready to give an official statement relative to questions about Barack Obama's
qualifications to be President of the USA.
In a follow-up call to my faxed letter of 24 November 2008 (which you
can read on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html by clicking the "Indonesia" link in my letter
to Chief Justice Roberts) I learned from the assistant to Ambassador Sudjadnan Parnohadiningrat that answers to the questions
raised in my letter will be forthcoming in an official statement by the Government of Indonesia only after a request is made
by the US Department of State.
I therefore urge you, Secretary of State Rice, to act at once to request information
from the Government of Indonesia which will help resolve questions raised about President Elect Barack Obama's qualifications
to be President of the USA.
This is an urgent matter insofar that pertinent facts and the applicable law need to
be established before the Electoral College selects our next President of the USA next Monday, 15 December 2008.
Indonesia can confirm the facts.
Briefly, the issues revolve around allegations that Barack Obama held Indonesian
citizenship under the name Barry Soetoro as a grammar school student in Jakarta in the mid 1960s and that he traveled with
an Indonesian passport in the early 1980s in the Indian subcontinent.
If either allegation is true, under existing
law, Barack Obama would have had to apply to become a naturalized citizen of the USA upon his return to live in the USA, which
he did not do.
Under existing law, he is technically an illegal alien and not qualified to hold any federal office
if either allegation is true.
Indonesia awaits your request of information to establish the facts.
S.
St. John  ************************************************************************************************************************
LETTER
TO CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS 11 November 2008
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10185
Tel/Fax: 212 534 5024
Mobile: 917 519 2905
Email:
metatron.metatron@verizon.net
11 November 2008
Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First
Street, N. E.
Washington, DC 20543
Copies to Associate Justice David H. Souter, Philip J. Berg
Dear Mr. Chief Justice,
I write to express my deep concern that President Elect Barack Obama might not be eligible
to hold the office of President of the United States. I ask that you act to suppress possible fraud or else remove any
doubt about Obama's eligibility before the Electoral College votes on 15 December.
Senator Obama and the Democratic
National Committee have for the past few months exhibited a lack of candor in addressing this issue in a forthright manner,
and have impeded discovery through legal maneuvers in answer to a complaint brought by Philip J. Berg in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (08-cv-4083). The complaint was dismissed for lack of standing,
and Berg then made petitions for an injunction to stay the election, which Justice Souter denied, and a Writ of Certiorari.
According to Berg's website http://www.obamacrimes.com/, President Elect Obama and the Democratic National Committee must respond by 1 December 2008. (Correction:
The preceding sentence erroneously implies legal obligation to respond; however, opposing parties are notified of the petition
and have the option to respond, and if they do indeed respond, only then must their response be on time as specified by the
court.) But can this matter concerning the office of the President of the USA wait for so long?
I
have proposed to the Senate Select Committee on Ethics that an ad hoc committee thoroughly
and convincingly investigate this matter on an urgent basis. (A copy of my fax broadcast message is attached, along
with letters sent directly to Senator Obama on 7 September and 27 October 2008.)
It would be a relatively simple
matter to visit Obama's paternal grandmother in Kenya and confirm her alleged claims that she witnessed the President Elect's birth in Kenya in 1961. If this claim is true,
Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA, and therefore, according to our Constitution
of the USA, he is not eligible to be president.
Also, consultation with the Government of Indonesia will confirm or rule out claims that Obama, known as Barry Soetoro, was enrolled as an Indonesian citizen in a grammar school
in Jakarta, and that in the early 1980s he traveled in the Indian subcontinent with an Indonesian passport. If these
claims are true, Barack Obama is not a naturalized citizen of the USA, and therefore he is not eligible to hold any federal
office.
Please use your influence to have this matter investigated and, if necessary, to suppress any fraud that
might be afoot against the people of the USA in the coming weeks and months. Members of the Electoral College must be
apprised of the facts and the applicable law as soon as possible.
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. St. John
 *************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast:
PRESIDENT ELECT BARACK OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA
10 November 2008
Citizen of the USA Stephen M. St. John calls upon members of the US Senate Select Committee on Ethics to investigate
with utmost priority claims by Philip J. Berg Esq. that President Elect Barack Obama is not eligible to hold federal office.
(See http://www.obamacrimes.com/.)
Berg vs. Obama (08-cv-4083) was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania for lack of standing. Berg then filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari
and an injunction to stay the election pending review.
Justice Souter denied the injunction and the Court awaits
the defendants' response, due 1 December 2008, before deciding whether or not to review Berg v. Obama.
However,
this slow legal process, which is the result of Senator Obama's and the DNC's failure to respond to civil requests for information
about Obama's eligibility, cannot possibly resolve substantial doubts about Obama's eligibility before the Electoral College
begins to select our next President.
The controlling laws for this situation may be found in Article II, Section
1, Amendment XII and Section 3 of Amendment XX of the Constitution of the USA.
Briefly, Berg alleges that Barack Obama's paternal grandmother has claimed that she witnessed Obama's birth in Mombasa,
Kenya on 4 August 1961; that Barack Obama, then known as Barry Soetoro, enrolled in a Catholic grammar school in Jakarta as
a citizen of Indonesia; and that in the early 1980s, when in his early 20s, he traveled through the Asian subcontinent with
an Indonesian passport.
If the first allegation proves to be true, then, according to the law, Barack Obama is
not a natural born citizen of the USA and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the USA.
Indeed, it may
very well turn out that he is not eligible to hold any federal office.
Berg's allegations deserve official confirmation
or denial on an expedited basis. An ad hoc committee should thoroughly and convincingly investigate this matter on an urgent basis.
He who will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the USA must
first respect, uphold and abide by it.
Let's be sure this is the case.
"It is the glory of God
to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter."
Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449,
New York, New York 10185
Website: http://www.show-the-house.com/  ************************************************************************************************************************
LETTER TO BARACK OBAMA
27 October 2008
Senator
Barack Obama
Copies to: Mr. Philip J. Berg, Esquire, and President George W. Bush
Dear Senator Obama,
I write to warn you that the issue of your eligibility to be our next POTUS will follow you even after your likely
election on 4 November 2008.
Judge R. Barclay Surrick's rejection of Philip J. Berg's lawsuit will not free you
of your responsibility to remove all doubt that you fully respect our supreme law of the land.
Berg, a true public
advocate, will take his case to the US Supreme Court, and if joined there by a presidential candidate, will easily vault the
issue of standing which Surrick placed as an obstacle.
The Certificate of Live Birth on your website shows a blacked-out
registration number, which prevents independent verification. Also, "African" is not a term for race, yet
it was used to describe your Kenyan father even though the correct term "Caucasian" was used for your mother.
Moveover, in 1961, the alternative designations for "Negro" or "Negroid," "Black," "Afro-American"
and "African," were not yet in common use.
Also, the four day delay between date of birth and date of
certificate raises questions. These aforementioned circumstances suggest fabrication and warrant an investigation.
You might find it good to walk away from some or all of your advisors.
Mr. Berg claims he has a tape recording
of your grandmother saying she witnessed your birth in Kenya. Upon verification, her testimony alone makes you ineligible
to be POTUS. Furthermore, there are other objections raised by Mr. Berg which must be carefully considered.
In conclusion, I can only suggest that you meet with Mr. Berg today or tomorrow and satisfy his demands for answers no matter
what the consequences. Otherwise, the issue of your eligibility will fester and cause widespread dissent and lay our
already weakened republic open to manipulations of an unprecedented scale.
Very truly yours, Stephen M. St. John
www.show-the-house.com
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States,
at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President" Constitution of
the United States, Article II, Section 1.  ************************************************************************************************************************
LETTER
TO BARACK OBAMA 7 September 2008 (Copy faxed to Philip
Berg)
Dear Senator Obama, I am deeply concerned that there might be a Constitutional crisis with respect to allegations
brought forward by Philip Berg in a complaint against you in Federal District Court of Philadelphia. Berg alleges you are not qualified to be President of the USA because you were born in Kenya,
in which case you would be acting at variance with the stipulation in our Constitution (Article II, Section 1) that "No
Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
shall be eligible to the Office of the President." So I ask you, sir, where exactly were you born? If you were born in the USA, fine. But if, indeed, as Berg alleges, you were born
in Kenya, you are in violation of the very document a president solemnly pledges to "preserve, protect and defend";
namely, the Constitution of the United States, our supreme law of the land. Please clear the air about this doubt raised by Philip Berg. It is better that you
take the initiative on this issue rather than be seen reacting to charges in a court of law. We must define ourselves
as members of a nation that follows the rule of law, and if you were born in Kenya, you, according to the law, are not eligible
to be president. If you are not eligible, this is indeed
a major disappointment for you. But you will raise your stature in my eyes with a forthright admission that you are
not eligible and a withdrawal as the Democratic Party candidate for President of the USA. If you are eligible, please
set the record straight by confronting Berg publicly. With
kind regards, Stephen
M. St. John Please visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id4.html and learn how the only provision in the Constitution of the USA which has never been exercised offers a model legal mechanism
for a solution to the Iranian/Arab-Zionist dispute! ************************************************************************************************************************
|
