Written and sent by fax broadcasts to New York and Washington in 2008 and 2009, these letters to former Attorneys General Mukasey and Holder raise many still unanswered questions about the official account of 9/11.  Now they gain new relevance ten years later with an introduction that exposes President Donald J. Trump, Sir Rudolph W. Giuliani, and Robert S. Mueller III, as principal actors not just in the current Russiagate investigations, but also in the illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 crime scene at Ground Zero in New York City.  Trump's own words seal his fate; hear his interview in English with the German television channel N24 on 13 September 2001.  Links and transcripts are provided.

The Trump-Mueller-Giuliani 9/11 fraud came under the purview of President George W. Bush and his Associate White House Counsel Brett Kavanaugh, among others.  Trump elevated Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States, thereby rewarding both Bush and Kavanaugh for their having overlooked his criminal disposal of evidence at Ground Zero.  Together these five men promoted the fake news narrative of 9/11 as a welcome pretext to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.  As former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed to CBS 60 Minutes in 2004, Bush showed intent to invade the Middle East well before 9/11 at his first National Security Council meeting in February 2001.  9/11 was Bush's big opportunity.

9/11 was a false flag military intelligence operation to frame and blame Arabs and Muslims and thereby commence Bush's aggressive wars in the Middle East under the guise of fighting terrorism.  Controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC7) and cybernetic telecommunications piracies (such as remote control of the attacking jets and high-tech impersonations on phones and radio) were the methods used by the real perpetrators of these heinous crimes.  The 9/11 shock & awe atrocities violated both domestic and international laws.  Such treasonous crimes are clearly actionable under the 1945 Nuremberg Principles.

Therefore the author argues for an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal because the Trump-Bush-Kavanaugh-Mueller-Giuliani conspiracy to commit fraud caused an ongoing series of unjustified, illegal and immoral wars in the Middle East which have resulted in millions of innocent victims across the globe.  Confronting this praxis of evil will prevent further horizontal asymmetric escalation toward full scale war with Russia, China and Iran. Otherwise, selective prosecution of Trump, howsoever  spectacular it may be, will shunt into oblivion the true extent of the Trump-Bush-Kavanaugh-Mueller-Giuliani conspiracy and leave these bad actors and their ilk free to create more havoc on a global scale.

  * * * * * * *

Copyright 2018 Stephen M. St. John

* * * * * * *

Table of Contents:

Dedication

Preface

Introduction

Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey

Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric H. Holder

Credits

Endnotes

About the Author

Contact

* * * * * * * 

Dedication

Preface

In the course of little more than a year, from 18 June 2008 to 22 June 2009, I wrote and sent by fax and mail a series of open letters on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the United States, Michael B. Mukasey and Eric H. Holder, Jr..  There were 78 of them in all; 60 to Mukasey followed by 18 to Holder.  In these letters I raised questions about the official story of the attacks of 11 September 2001 and called for a new and a real investigation.  I never had replies to my letters, and the questions remain unanswered.  I feel that now is a good time for a second effort to find the truth and pursue justice.

Some Technical Matters

By “open letters” I mean that each of them was also sent by fax broadcast to approximately 2,500 recipients, including every member of the United States Congress, both Senate and House; nearly every embassy in Washington and mission to the United Nations in New York; as well as many public and private individuals and organizations, including news media.  In addition, many copies were also sent by email, including to every member of the British House of Lords with a published email address.  These fax and email broadcasts were all written and sent by me at my own expense from my residence on the Upper East Side of New York.  Most of the faxes consisted of a cover page only; so most letters were edited to fit in a very limited amount of space and without the paragraph breaks that you see in this ebook.  All letters were posted on my private website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html for Mukasey, and later, at http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html for Holder.  Photos and updates were added.

The contact information included in each of these letters has been removed from this ebook edition to avoid needless repetition and because it is outdated and no longer in use.  However, for the record, here is my erstwhile contact information that appeared in these letters:  Post Office Box 449, Rockefeller Center, New York, NY 10185, email address metatron.metatron@verizon.net, 212 534 5024 (land line) and 917 519 2905 (cell phone).  I repeat:  this contact information is now outdated and not in use.

The “Contact” section of this ebook gives my current contact information, and I will be happy to entertain any decently expressed comments.  Any and all errors in my ebook are my own, and if you can find and correct any of them, I'll be grateful to hear from you.

Every third letter is followed by an internal link to bring you back to the table of contents.

External links appear just as they did in the original faxes.  In some cases, where links have been corrupted, I have given new links in clearly marked updates.  Where there is a corrupted link but no update, please search with key words on Google.  Where links given in updates are corrupted, I offer my apologies if a shrug of my shoulders is not good enough.  Perhaps the causes of corrupted links should be studied diligently.

Correction:  In letter #33 to Attorney General Mukasey, I erroneously stated that the off-the-chart seismic spikes occurring right before the collapses of the World Trade Center Twin Towers mix with the seismic spikes of an earthquake in Indonesia.  However, the earthquake in Indonesia was too far away to register on the 9/11 seismogram in the Palisades of New Jersey.  Inasmuch as the demolitions of the Twin Towers and the earthquake in Indonesia all happened in order at roughly half-hour intervals, and the seismogram appears in half-hour segments, the earthquake certainly would have appeared aligned with the demolitions had the seismograph been sensitive enough to record it.  This is one of many weird coincidences concerning the events of 9/11.  Be that as it may, letter #33 needs to be rewritten.  The technical capability of inducing earthquakes by directed energy is broached, but broken links and frequent earthquakes in Iran and California indicate an urgent need for exploration of this matter.

Correction:  In the 2018 letter to Attorney General Sessions, a copy of which appears in the following introduction, I refer to an interview with Donald J. Trump on WOR Radio on 11 September 2001.  The interview actually took place by phone on WWOR TV.

Several external links take you to my articles addressed to the international community where I write in the third person as Citizen of the USA Stephen M. St. John; this usage, I have found, spooks some women and children and farm animals.  There is no need for hysteria.  In addressing embassies in Washington and missions to the United Nations in New York, I simply adopted formal diplomatic language as a sign of respect.

Purpose in writing these letters

My purpose in writing these letters was to pursue truth and justice concerning 9/11.  I did not and still do not believe the official account of 9/11 which is contained in the 9/11 Commission Report.  In the spirit of the slogan promoted by the Department of Homeland Security, “if you see something, say something,” I sought to question authority by raising red flags where evidence and logic contradict the official story.  Inasmuch as I believed then and still believe today that there is an on-going official cover-up of what really happened on 9/11, I made fax broadcasts of these letters to put these matters on record for responsible officials not just in the USA but in the worldwide international community as well.

There were very few responses to my open letters, and they ranged from anonymous, cowardly threats to requests to resend because of garbled printer copies to words of encouragement to one pot-boiler response from the US Department of Justice.  Mukasey and Holder ignored my open letters that I addressed and sent to them.  As a constituent of Senators Hillary Clinton, Kirsten Gilibrand, Charles Schumer and Representative Carolyn Maloney, I was disappointed by the walls of silence and of shunning exhibited by their refusals to reply to my follow-up communications concerning these open letters that they had received by fax in their offices.

The right and responsibility of a citizen of the USA to question authority is sacrosanct.  By my own experience, however, I can say that exercise of such right is not welcome with regard to the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington and the events surrounding them.  Right from the start, the atmosphere had been poisoned by the yottaWatt purveyors of fake news and a general public that is just a bit too gullible for its own good.  This is a very unhealthy situation both here in the USA and abroad.

And so, a decade after writing and sending these open letters on 9/11, and nearly two decades after the attacks themselves, we have arrived at a situation where former United States Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, told the 2018 graduating class at the Virginia Military Institute, “If our leaders seek to conceal the truth or we as people become accepting of alternative realities that are no longer grounded in facts, then we as American citizens are on a pathway to relinquishing our freedom.”  These dire words strike home, for the title of my work, Lifting the Burdens of Falsehood & Deceit, suggests what must be done to reverse an ominous nationwide trend.

Tillerson warned, "If we do not as Americans confront the crisis of ethics and integrity in our society and among our leaders in both private and public sectors, and regrettably at times even the nonprofit sector, then American democracy as we know it is entering its twilight years."  Lifting the burdens of falsehood and deceit means holding our praxis of evil up to the light so as to expose it for the sake of truth, accountability and justice.

Indeed!  Our United States Congress heavily promotes the STEM curricula (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), but at the same time would have people believe that Sir Isaac Newton's laws of motion were suspended during the ten seconds that it took for each of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center to fall.  Ten seconds is about what it would have taken for a baseball dropped from the roof of WTC1 or WTC2 to hit the ground.  What massive steel and concrete building suddenly has the properties of air, albeit a very polluted air?

The United States Congress failed the people miserably.  The United States Congress thinks we are a nation of morons who will accept such nonsense.  Its aggravated dereliction of duty is tantamount to a war crime because its rush to judgment and war based on fake news and bad science killed over one million Arab Semites and turned tens of millions of them into homeless refugees.  You want to talk about anti-Semitism?

Another warning very much like Tillerson’s also came from the former Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, who told the 2018 graduating class at Rice University, “When elected officials speak as though they are above the truth, they will act as though they are above the law. And when we tolerate dishonesty, we get criminality.”  He also said, “the greatest threat to American democracy isn't communism or jihadism, or any other external force or foreign power.  It's our own willingness to tolerate dishonesty in service of party, and in pursuit of power.”  Bloomberg also said, “But at the national level, in Washington today, partisanship is everything.  And I think the dishonesty that it produces is one of the greatest challenges that your generation will have to confront.”

Bloomberg's pointing out this dire challenge prompts one to ask, how could the United States Congress rush to war in Afghanistan when, from the very beginning of the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, many competent people had doubts about the fake news that they were hearing over and over again?  How could the United States Congress fail to consider red flags such as the lack of credible airport surveillance videos at all three major high-security airports from which the allegedly hijacked jets were said to have departed?  Or, that the standard hijack code was not sent to air traffic controllers from the allegedly hijacked jets?  Or, that the ethical flight termination capabilities to hijack hijackers were not employed to overtake the allegedly hijacked jets?  Overzealous loyalty to a political party is certainly not an acceptable excuse for such abysmal failures.  The reality, however, is that such failures by the United States Congress were bipartisan in every way, and are tantamount to war crimes.

Our corrupt two-party "deep state" monopoly fosters a dangerous combination of dishonesty, ignorance, stupidity and cowardice among our elected leaders, who have lost the moral high ground with a foreign policy based on fraud and force.  "Where there is no vision, the people perish." (Proverbs of Solomon 29:18)

But there is yet another kind of dishonesty about which Bloomberg remains silent; namely, the Talmudic law of the Moser (the Hebrew word for informer), which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew directly or indirectly.  Such a conspiracy of silence is very real and it undermines our judicial, law enforcement, intelligence, publishing and broadcast institutions.  In many of my letters to the Attorneys General Mukasey and Holder, I repeatedly raise the issue of the Talmudic law of the Moser vis-à-vis the shock and awe telecommunications piracies and controlled demolitions of 9/11.  You will not find Moser between Moselle wine and Moses in the Merriam-Webster Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary.  Here's your chance to learn the meaning and implications of this word.  My research on this matter included visits to the Judaica Collection at the main branch of the New York Public Library on Fifth Avenue.

The Way Forward

Honesty certainly matters, and as both Bloomberg and Tillerson see an urgent need to confront dishonesty in government, let me likewise urge you the reader to take a stand here and confront our proper authorities about all the unanswered questions that have been raised by very many competent people around the world concerning what really happened on 9/11.  If Lifting the Burdens of Falsehood & Deceit helps you toward such a goal, I will have achieved my main purpose in collecting these letters to Mukasey and Holder and, ten years later, publishing them in this ebook; namely, to help initiate a new and a real investigation of 9/11 that will establish the truth and pursue justice.

An International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal may be the best way to get the job done.  Given the sordid record of the United States Congress in exercising its constitutional mandate "to define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and offenses against the Law of Nations" relative to 9/11, any legal proceedings involving judicial discovery concerning 9/11 will be avoided at all costs in the USA.  So an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal is much to be preferred over suspects investigating suspects who appear to have violated international law, including the Nuremberg Principles, by commencing wars with fake news.

Even the partisan rancor in Washington, where lies about 9/11 were told so as to commence a series of unjustified, immoral, and illegal wars in the Middle East, is not very conducive to holding treasonous warmongers to account.  The Big Lie about 9/11 holds together the entire political spectrum in the USA.  Moreover, the vilification of President Trump for his recent meeting in Helsinki with the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, contrasts sharply with standing ovations by a joint session of the United States Congress for the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, who has met with Putin nine times since 2015, including three meetings in 2018, even though Netanyahu has said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel."  Where's the outrage?  Readers of my letters to Attorney General Mukasey deserve to know that when Netanyahu visits New York, he sometimes attends the synagogue that Mukasey attends.  Is this where the partisan rancor in Washington ends?  Is this where our unity begins?  Will warmongers ever impeach warmongers for warmongering?

However, an opening for 9/11 truth now appears among the main cast of characters in the current “Russiagate” media circus;  President of the United States Donald J. Trump, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III, and former Mayor of New York City, Sir Rudolph Giuliani, should all be prosecuted for illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 crime scene known as “Ground Zero” at the World Trade Center.  All three men were involved in the illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 "Ground Zero" crime scene.  Their purpose was to confiscate and hide evidence of controlled demolitions and aircraft identification.  Moreover, the newly  installed Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Brett Kavanaugh, was an Associate White House Counsel to President Bush during 9/11, and apparently he backed Bush's failed attempt to prevent an investigation of 9/11.  The illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 "Ground Zero" crime scene by Giuliani, Mueller and Trump certainly came under the purview of both President Bush and his Associate White House Counsel Brett Kavanaugh, among others.  Apparently they approved these crimes!  They certainly had the intelligence and wherewithal to assess properly and quickly a situation where three World Trade Center skyscrapers fell at free-fall speed in the course of nine hours, but preferred to follow the "deep state" fake news narrative that explained these building collapses.  They were keen to have a good reason to squander borrowed money on wars, proxy wars and other malign activities abroad.  They too deserve a fair trial at an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal.  I take up this very grave matter in the following introduction.

Stephen M. St. John
San José, California
13 February 2019

Introduction

Back on 12 February 2018, I sent by regular post to the Attorney General of the United States, Mr. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, a letter concerning a 9/11-related conflict of interest between President of the United States Donald J. Trump and Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III.  Although there was no reply, I still believe that this grave matter is still a good starting point for an investigation leading to impeachment proceedings against President Trump or prosecution by an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal or both.  Truth about 9/11 and justice for the real perpetrators of such great evil of global dimensions will reverse the current trend of aggressive horizontal asymmetric escalation toward full scale global war against Russia, China and Iran.

Earlier, in mid-December 2017, I had discovered on the Internet two YouTube recordings of interviews with Donald J. Trump which had taken place on 11 and 13 September 2001.  My own analysis of these interviews led me to conclude that Donald Trump was some kind of agent of influence with about 225 of his men deployed inside the sealed-off and closely guarded crime scene known as “Ground Zero” at the World Trade Center in New York City.  This crime scene was under the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which at the time was headed by Robert S. Mueller III, who is now the Special Counsel so much in the news concerning “Russiagate” and, perhaps, more.

A copy of my unrequited letter to Attorney General Sessions appears below along with links to and transcripts of the two YouTube interviews with Donald Trump which are cited in this letter.  I use bold italics to emphasize the most relevant words spoken by Trump in these transcripts.  Following the transcripts you will find my analysis.

* * * * * * *

Mr. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
Attorney General of the United States
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Copy to:  Mr. Christopher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

12 February 2018

Dear Mr. Sessions,

Let me, a concerned citizen of the United States, point to a blatant conflict of interest between the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, and the Special Counsel, Robert S. Mueller III.

Mr. Mueller, as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, presided over the investigation at Ground Zero at the World Trade Center in New York City from 11 September 2001 until its conclusion.  And Mr. Trump, on 13 September 2001, told German TV reporter Stephan Bachenheimer that he had about 225 men working at Ground Zero, where “we have to get rid of what’s there” and, if possible, recover survivors.  See and hear this interview at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c.

Inasmuch as Mr. Trump said to Mr. Bachenheimer at the very beginning of the interview that none of his properties in lower Manhattan had sustained any damage from the attacks on the World Trade Center complex, and that what his men were doing there was “amazing,” one must ask, why were his men there in a secured crime scene under the jurisdiction of the Director of the FBI?

Furthermore, in an interview given on WOR radio within hours of the attack on the World Trade Center, Mr. Trump lied about the construction of the Twin Towers, which he likened to “a can of soup” without steel core columns in the center next to the elevator shafts.  Why would Mr. Trump lie about this when he certainly knew better?  Hear this interview at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w.

Also, Mr. Trump gave his professional opinion in the WOR radio interview that explosives must have been used for the jets to have penetrated the heaviest caliber steel of the perimeter columns, but two days later, on 13 September 2001, he did not mention any explosions at all to Mr. Bachenheimer.

Mr. Trump’s prevarication about lack of core columns in the Twin Towers, and his backtracking on his statements about explosives, strongly indicate his being, at the very least, an accessory both before and after the fact of the crime of this young century and its subsequent cover-up.

For more on this subject, please see my recent letter of 31 January 2018 to each and every member of the European Parliament, in the last section, Sparks of Glory emanate from the White House, at http://www.show-the-house.com/id125.html.

Very truly yours,
Stephen M. St. John

Post Office Box 720274
San José, CA 95172
stephen@show-the-house.com

* * * * * * *

TRANSCRIPT

Alan Marcus (AM):  Donald, you’re probably the best known builder – particularly of great buildings in the city – there’s a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect or possibly by bombs or aftershocks.  Do you have any thoughts on that?

Donald Trump (DT):  Well, it wasn’t an architectural defect.  You know the World Trade Center was always known as a very strong building.  Don’t forget, that took a big bomb in the basement.  Now the basement is the most vulnerable place because that’s your foundation.  And it withstood that.  And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building.  And I said, “I can’t believe it!”  The building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out.  So, this was an unbelievably powerful building.  If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside.  The steel – the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows – is that in between all the windows you had the steel on the outside.  See, you had the steel on the outside of the building.  That’s why when I first looked – and you had big, heavy I-beams – when I first looked at it I couldn’t believe it because there was a hole in the steel, and this is steel that was – you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center, folks? – I think, you know, if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow and in between was this heavy steel.  I said, “how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747, or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel?”   I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously.  Because I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall.  Most buildings are built with the steel is on the inside around the elevator shaft.  This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a can of soup.

AM:  You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two.  And when you see that approach the far side, and all of a sudden, within a matter of a millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side.

DT:  Right.  I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel.  I think, obviously there were very big planes.  They were going very rapidly, because, I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building, so was getting the speed from going down hill, so to speak.  It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction, is even more than a big plane.  Because you are talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building.  These buildings were rock solid.  And, you know, it’s just an amazing, amazing thing.  This country is different today.  And it’s going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.

AM:  A very profound statement, and very true.

* * * * * * *

TRANSCRIPT

Stephan Bachenheimer (SB):  Mr. Trump, do you have any interest in the area down there that’s been affected?

Donald Trump (DT):  I have a lot of property down there but it wasn’t, fortunately, affected by what happened to the World Trade Center.

SB:  What’s your biggest fear, Mr. Trump?

DT:  Well, I just went to what they call “Ground Zero.”   I’ve never seen anything like it – the devastation, the human life that has been just wasted for no reason whatsoever, ah, it is a terrible scene, a terrible sight, but New Yorkers are very strong and resilient and they will rebuild quickly.

SB:  Mr. Trump, what should be the response to this attack?   How should the US respond to such a devastation?

DT:  Well, I think they have to respond quickly and effectively.  They have to find out exactly what the cause was, who did it, and they have to go after these people because there is no other choice.  And then, secondarily and much less importantly, we have to rebuild in some form that will be just as majestic as the World Trade Center.

SB:  Will you be involved, will you take any efforts, any steps, to reconstruct the area?

DT: Well, I have a lot of men down here right now; we have over a hundred and we have about one hundred and twenty five coming, so we’ll have a couple of hundred people down here, and they’re very brave and what they’re doing is amazing, and we will be involved in some form in helping to reconstruct.

SB:  What kind of cost would you estimate to rebuild this area?  How much money has been lost in the attack?

DT:  I would say fifteen to twenty billion dollars.  You’re talking billions and billions of dollars, and it’s irreparable.  Irreparable.  But I really feel that the location is such, and the importance of the monument is such, that we have to rebuild.  And again, not necessarily in the form of the two towers, but something has to be done that’s very big and very majestic.

SB:  A lot of people ask, how is it possible that a Boeing plane would be able to destroy the, or two planes, would be able to destroy the Twin Towers?  Because they were constructed to withstand, like a 707 attack.

DT:  It’s tremendous power and tremendous heat, and people were willing to die, and when they’re willing to die, and when they’re willing to become kamikazes of a sense, there’s very little you can do about it.  I mean, the heat and the power... actually, it was amazing that the initial jolts didn’t jar the building as much as people would have thought.  But the tremendous amounts of fuel that was dumped on the building, and 1600 degrees temperature, I guess that’s probably more than anything can take, no matter what.”

SB:  When do you think you will start to rebuild?

DT: Well, I would hope it would really be very quickly, a lot of great genius people in this city, and I think that within a shorter period of time than, first, we have to get rid of what’s there, and we have to save as many lives as possible, if that is possible – today they found five people under the rubble, which is amazing, alive -- but after that process takes place, I think they can start thinking about rebuilding, absolutely.

SB:  Viele Danke, Mr. Trump.

DT:  Danke, Danke.

* * * * * * *

ANALYSIS

A new and a real investigation into the crimes of 9/11 will reveal an elaborately planned deception and rampant criminality within the US Government and news media for the purpose of carrying out long-laid plans to wage aggressive wars and occupations in the Middle East and beyond.  My open letters to Attorneys General Michael B. Mukasey and Eric H. Holder pointed to this conclusion in 2008 and 2009.

The mastermind of such a ruse to commence perpetual war by means of cybernetic telecommunications piracies against airliners and controlled demolitions of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 had to have had a detailed knowledge of construction and aviation.  And our man in Washington, Donald J. Trump, perfectly fits the profile of that rare set of individuals having such detailed knowledge of both construction and aviation.

Global Construction Review quoted Trump on 9 November 2016:  “Construction is what I know. Nobody knows it better.”  Then we heard President Trump tell Sean Hannity on Fox News on 26 January 2017:  “And I'm negotiating the price of airplanes, can you believe this? But I understand airplanes.  I've bought a lot of airplanes.”

Surely President Trump is well aware of the technical capabilities of taking over an aircraft’s flight control and communications systems by remote-control.  This ingenious technology was developed decades ago to stop hijackings.  But the potential for nefarious use of this brilliant technology unfortunately arose as well.  Being also capable of impersonating crew and passengers by real-time digital voice morphing, cybernetic telecommunications pirates are a danger to world peace. They hide behind state and corporate secrecy laws and policies, so their crimes are very nearly perfect.  Electronic manipulations are very hard to detect.  They are used to frame and blame opponents.

Trump’s name is synonymous with construction globally, and it is indelibly etched in the minds of New Yorkers, whose city many regard as the world capital largely because New York has the great honor of being the host city of the United Nations headquarters.  Trump knows what it takes to build a building in New York, and I’m sure he has a pretty good idea of what it takes to bring a building down.  He certainly knows the odds of Al Qa’ida’s having placed explosives inside the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC 1 & 2) and the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) were virtually nil.

Besides Trump’s unique profile in the construction and aviation industries, his broadcast interviews on 11 and 13 September 2001 raise many important questions and concerns.

For example, within hours of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, Donald Trump told Alan Marcus and Rolland G. Smith, in a broadcast telephone interview on WWOR TV in New York, that, in his professional opinion, the attackers had “bombs that exploded almost simultaneously” with the impact of the jets into the Twin Towers.  Trump also noted that the attacking jets penetrated “the heaviest caliber steel,” which fact suggested to him that bombs must have been used in synchronization with the attacking jets.

But two days later, in his interview with N24 German TV channel near Ground Zero, Trump not once brought up the subject of explosions with interviewer Stephan Bachenheimer.  Apparently the very idea of the alleged hijackers’ not being able to plant explosives and proximity fuses inside the Boeing 767s from inside the waiting lounges at Logan International Airport, or inside the heavily guarded Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and Salomon Brothers Building in New York City sometime before traveling up to Boston, had suddenly overnight made this subject of explosions taboo.

On this same day, 13 September 2001, the news media no longer published the many eyewitness reports of explosions inside the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Salomon Brothers Building.  Such explosions were not limited to the explosions upon the jet impacts as initially suggested by Mr. Trump.  Such skewed reporting gave people around the world a false narrative that helped to build a consensus for war.

And so, seventeen years later, a new and a real investigation of 9/11 needs to ask, why would Trump candidly explain that explosives were used and then two days later fall into line with the skewed reporting building a consensus for war?  From that point on, Trump became a purveyor of fake news and an accessory after the fact in the greatest shock and awe atrocity of this young century.  A 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal must ask, “Who planted explosives in the World Trade Center Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7?”  It certainly wasn’t al Qa’ida; the real perpetrators walk among us!

Despite his having shot his mouth off about explosives timed with jet impacts into the Twin Towers in his WWOR TV interview with Alan Marcus and Rolland G. Smith, Donald Trump did manage in that same interview to lay the foundation for the false and misleading rumor that the Twin Towers had no core columns.  Within hours of the attacks on 9/11, Trump described the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center:  “It was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside.  Most buildings are built with the steel is on the inside around the elevator shafts.  This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a can of soup.”

To the contrary, each of the Twin Towers had a total of 287 steel support columns, consisting of 240 perimeter columns (of which Trump spoke) and 47 massive core columns around the elevator shafts (of which Trump was deceitfully quiet).  Also, as a native New Yorker, on visits to lower Manhattan on summer vacation I watched the construction of the Twin Towers from their foundations, and witnessed both the core columns and perimeter columns going up.  Additionally, photographic evidence exists showing both the core columns and perimeter columns at various stages of the construction.

Inasmuch as one of Trump’s structural engineers had previously worked on the construction of the Twin Towers, and gave Trump a personally guided tour in 1993, Trump certainly knew that there were massive core columns as well as the perimeter columns.  From this we can only conclude that Donald Trump was on WWOR TV just hours after the attacks to plant fake news in the minds of the public on a matter that has changed peoples’ lives forever.  Trump was so prompt in telling such an obviously rehearsed falsehood (“like a can of soup”) that one must consider the possibilities of foreknowledge and of his being an accessory before the fact as well.  Trump's fake news helped to spawn the fake "pancake theory" of the collapses of the Twin Towers, for which he deserves the mob nickname Donnie Pancakes.  These heavy matters certainly deserve careful judicial review in all aspects either by impeachment proceedings of the nonesuch United States Congress or, preferably, by an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal.

Moreover, Trump was also a bit too quick to mention to the German TV audience “the importance of the monument” at the World Trade Center, which suggests that he was “on message” with a well rehearsed reference to “the monument” that did not yet exist and had still not yet been proposed or even mentioned by his interviewer, Stephan Bachenheimer.  It would seem that Trump placed a value on "the monument" as a rallying point for the ensuing wars in the Middle East.  This is psychopathic behavior.

Stephan Bachenheimer also asked Donald Trump, “Will you be involved, will you take any efforts, take any steps to reconstruct the area?”

Trump replied, “Well, I have a lot of men down here right now; we have over a hundred and we have about one hundred and twenty five coming, so we’ll have a couple of hundred people down here, and they’re very brave and what they’re doing is amazing, and we will be involved in some form in helping to reconstruct.”

There are three problems with Trump’s response.

First, Trump had previously mentioned to Bachenheimer at the very beginning of the interview that he had “a lot of property down there but it wasn’t, fortunately, affected by what happened to the World Trade Center.”  Approximately 225 men were way too many to take care of the main task of making sure all the doors and windows at Trump’s undamaged properties were closed.  Other than for that, one would think that Trump’s 225 men had no business being there.

Second, Ground Zero was a well-guarded and closed-off crime scene with carefully restricted access.  I personally tried to gain access there but was turned away at Chambers and Hudson.  None of Trump’s personnel, numbering about 225, had any known qualifications in crime scene investigations.  They had no business being there at Ground Zero.  But they were there.  What were they doing there at Ground Zero that was so “amazing”?

Third, Trump’s personnel were, at the time of the interview, not engaged in any reconstruction.  Reconstruction would only begin months later at World Trade Center 7 and years later near where the Twin Towers once stood.  Bachenheimer’s question was about reconstruction, but Trump’s answer was really about recovery at Ground Zero, even though he indicated at the conclusion of his answer that he had understood the question.  Why would Donald Trump conflate in his own mind two concepts, reconstruction and recovery?

Trump-Mueller 9/11 Conflict of Interest

The unflappable Bachenheimer maintained focus and later, near the end of the interview, continued to probe with a very simple question, “When do you think you will start to rebuild?”  Here is where Donald Trump gave the game away with his answer:

“Well, I would hope it would really be very quickly, a lot of great genius people in this city, and I think that within a shorter period of time than, first, we have to get rid of what’s there, and we have to save as many lives as possible, if that is possible – today they found five people under the rubble, which is amazing, alive -- but after that process takes place, I think they can start thinking about rebuilding, absolutely.”

So now we know that when Donald Trump said, “first, we have to get rid of what’s there,” his approximately 225 men were at Ground Zero very soon after the attacks of 11 September 2001 “to get rid of what’s there”!  Were they all maids, doormen, concierges, elevator operators, baggage handlers, dog walkers, accountants, lawyers, comfort engineers and maintenance men?  Or, did Trump call in a private army of expert contractors and mercenaries to work alongside the FBI to scour the debris for incriminating evidence that had to be removed?

Was one of Trump’s “amazing” men the miracle worker who allegedly found the pristine passport of alleged hijacker Satam As-Suqami after it had miraculously passed through the hellish inferno and then turned it over to the New York Police Department without being registered in the chain of custody of evidence?  Were these “amazing” men the guys who made the virtually indestructible black boxes disappear in that same hellish inferno that yielded the pristine passport?

To whom exactly did Donald Trump refer when he said “we” as in “first, we have to get rid of what’s there”?  Did he mean the then Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller?  Mueller, who is now Trump’s “Russiagate” Inquisitor, had ultimate responsibility for the investigation of 9/11.  And one may easily surmise from reading David Ray Griffin’s Bush and Cheney:  How they ruined America and the World, Part II:  "9/11:  A Miraculous Day," that Mueller is ultimately the man with a pocketful of miracles and no evidence about 9/11 that could withstand proper scrutiny in a court of law.  Mueller and Trump both worked the 9/11 “Ground Zero” crime scene!

As for Trump, he had no known official capacity to work the crime scene, yet he talked openly as though he did have the authority to do so.  Already I can hear Donald Trump speaking from the dock at the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal about illegal removal of evidence at the 9/11 “Ground Zero” crime scene in New York.

In my Critique – with Recommendations -- of the Dutch Safety Board’s Final Report on the Shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id119.html), I cited as a good example of cybernetic telecommunications piracy Edward Felt’s miraculous 9/11 cell phone call from a lavatory aboard the allegedly hijacked United Airlines Flight 93.  Now I wonder that perhaps this lesson learned from 9/11, which was presented in the fall of 2016 in such a sudden and unexpected way in an email broadcast mainly, but not exclusively, to every member of the European Parliament, caused real fear in our Anglo-Zionist-Neoconservative “deep state,” and that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller’s “Russiagate” investigation of Trump is really a pretext to probe for and stop the unravelling of the 9/11 fable.  Already I can hear Robert Mueller speak from the dock of the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal about Edward Felt’s faked cell phone call from United Airlines Flight 93.

Also to be considered is the blatant conflict of interest whereby FBI Director Mueller oversaw the FBI 9/11 Ground Zero investigation where Donald Trump also had his 225 men deployed.  Mueller is clearly responsible for the 9/11 cover-up and Donald Trump seems to have been helping him "get rid of what's there."  Is Trump using inside knowledge of the “inside job” of 9/11 for blackmail?  Is this why Special Counsel Mueller is now investigating Trump on nonsense about Russiagate with freedom to follow any and all additional leads encountered along the way?  Is Trump being set up for a CIA 9/11 “limited hangout” whereby conspirators turn on fellow conspirators to find a scapegoat when they sense their impending undoing?  Are we headed for another coup d’état?  Remember, here in the United States of America, regime changes are us!

Trump-Mueller-Giuliani-Kavanaugh-Bush 9/11 Conflicts of Interest

Not long after my unanswered 12 February 2018 letter to Attorney General Sessions (shown above), former Mayor of New York City, Sir Rudolf Giuliani, became President Trump's lead counsel in matters related to the investigations of the "Russiagate" Special Counsel, Robert S. Mueller.  Like Trump and Mueller, Giuliani was also involved in the illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 crime scene known as "Ground Zero."  In fact, Mayor Giuliani ordered the removal of the World Trade Center debris despite vigorous protests that such removal precluded proper forensic examination.  Because until 9/11 no steel-framed high-rise building had ever collapsed due to fire, engineers wanted sufficient time to examine carefully all the debris at "Ground Zero" in order to know what had actually happened.  Mueller, as FBI Director, had jurisdiction over the World Trade Center crime scene.  And Trump, as his own words reveal in his interview with Stephan Bachenheimer of N24 TV, had 225 of his men at the World Trade Center crime scene to "get rid of what's there."  All three men have conflicts of interest related to the illegal removal of crime scene evidence at "Ground Zero"!

On top of the Trump-Mueller-Giuliani 9/11 conflicts of interest is President Trump's installation of Brett Kavanaugh as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.  Mr. Kavanaugh served as an Associate White House Counsel to President George W. Bush in the beginning of his first term in office, which included 9/11 and events leading up to and following the 11 September 2001 attacks on New York and Washington.  It appears that Mr. Kavanaugh supported President Bush's initial attempts both to prevent an investigation of 9/11 and to foist upon the peoples of this earth an outrageous conspiracy theory involving 19 Arab hijackers.  Moreover, it is certain that the illegal removal of evidence from the "Ground Zero" crime scene came under the purview of both Bush and Kavanaugh, among others.  Both men failed to do the right thing.  They preferred the fake news narratives to get their wars and purchase orders for the "deep state" military-industrial complex.  So just as we have discovered the Trump-Mueller-Giuliani 9/11 conflicts of interest, we now see the unfolding of these conflicts of interest to the point that we can now call them the Trump-Mueller-Giuliani-Kavanaugh-Bush 9/11 conflicts of interest.

There are those who have considered that Kavanaugh's position against the prosecution of a president while in office made him an attractive choice for Trump in filling Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy's vacated seat on the Supreme Court.  But The Constitution of the United States (Article II.4) does indeed allow for the prosecution of a president while in office through impeachment proceedings of the United States Congress.  However, according to Article I.3, "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust, or Profit under the United States:  but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law."  This includes international law, especially the Nuremberg Principles.

Here let me list the Nuremberg Principles according to Wikipedia:

1.  Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.

2.  The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.

3.  The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

4.  The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

5.  Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.

6.  The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:  (1) crimes against peace and humanity; (2) war crimes; (3) crimes against humanity.

7.  Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle 6 is a crime under international law.

Time to Reconsider the 9/11 Fable

As I have endeavored to point out in my open letters on 9/11 to Attorneys General Michael B. Mukasey and Eric H. Holder, the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) were taken down by controlled demolitions.  The collapses of these super-strong steel and concrete buildings were not caused by the collisions of the attacking jets, subsequent fires, and gravity.  Rather, they were the result of very high energy explosives.  Al Qa'ida had no access to place the charges.

These controlled demolitions, however, were portrayed by the fake news media to a gullible general public as simply the result of structural damage from the jet impacts, fires from jet fuel and office furnishings, and gravity.  In 2018, we have discovered that Donald J. Trump, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and Mayor of New York City Sir Rudolf Giuliani were all guiding and controlling the fake news media reporting on 9/11 by their illegal removal of evidence from the 9/11 "Ground Zero" crime scene.  President George W. Bush and his Associate White House Counsel Brett Kavanaugh condoned their crimes.  Together, these five men formed a conspiracy to frame and blame Arab Semites and commence lucrative wars and occupations in the Middle East.

On the other hand, physicists have pointed out at least ten descriptive characteristics of controlled demolitions of WTC 1, 2 and 7.  Other than for the initial tilt of the upper floors of WTC 2, there are no descriptive characteristics of mechanical collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7 due to structural damage from jet impacts, the subsequent fires and gravity.  Science says only explosions enabled the free-fall collapses of WTC 1, 2 and 7.  Each building fell as fast as a rock dropped from the roof, with nothing underneath to stop or slow the fall.  The scientifically sound observations and conclusions of physicists and other competent persons were suppressed from the very beginning by President George W. Bush, Associate White House Counsel Brett Kavanaugh, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, Mayor of New York City Sir Rudolf Giuliani, and Donald J. Trump.  Their web of conspiracy "to get rid of what's there" hid the true nature of the attacks of 9/11 and promoted yottaWatt fake news accounts that led us into unjust wars abroad.

For the right perspective to view the collapses of both Twin Towers, see the video taken by Richard A. Siegel from the other side of the Hudson river in Hoboken, New Jersey.  Siegel’s video should be Exhibit #1 at the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal.  I’d love to hear Donald Trump and George W. Bush and Michael Mullen tell the world from the dock of the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal what they see and hear in the Richard A. Siegel video. (see http://kunaki.com/Sales.asp?PID=PX00ZU24A4)

Near the end of the collapse of the north tower, World Trade Center 1, I see some still-standing perimeter steel columns evaporating, which suggests to me energy of unusually great magnitude from some mysterious source other than the explosions that are also evident in the video and soundtrack.

The soundtrack of Richard A. Siegel’s 9/11 Raw video includes in the background the CBS 1010 WINS radio station’s live broadcast, which gave the tone that told the ten o’clock hour; this enables investigators to accurately time the explosions seen in the video and heard on the soundtrack after taking into account the distance the sound travelled.  The timing results can then be correlated with the seismograph readings of 9/11 at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.  For more information on this subject, please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKLUXhTgRz8.

The International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal, or impeachment proceedings by the nonesuch United States Congress, must consider the question, are the seismogram's off-the-chart seismic spikes caused by the collapses of the buildings or by explosives?  The scientists at Lamont-Doherty consider the spikes to be the result of the jet strikes (not shown on the Siegel video) and the building collapses only.  Other researchers maintain that only very strong explosives could have caused the off-the-chart seismic spikes, and that the energy produced by the jet strikes and the building collapses dissipated well above ground level and at ground level, and therefore could not have been detected by the Lamont-Doherty seismograph at such a distance with such varied geology and topography including the Hudson River Gorge.  Indeed, it appears to me that off-the-chart seismic spikes immediately precede the collapses of the Twin Towers.  For more information on this very important subject, please see https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/443-faq-4-do-the-seismic-data-from-the-events-at-the-world-trade-center-corroborate-the-eyewitness-video-and-forensic-evidence-of-controlled-demolition.

Furthermore, the flight of one of the jets into one of the Twin Towers, the south tower World Trade Center 2, appeared to have been beyond the human capability of a pilot in a Boeing 767, which strongly suggests remote control piloting of the jet in a high-speed descending arc that produced a gravitational pull that no human could possibly endure while still steering the jet.  Cybernetic telecommunications piracy explains remote control hijacking of the jet as well as voice impersonations of crew members and passengers with real-time digital voice morphing.  The failure of the pilots and crews of all four allegedly hijacked jets to send the hijack code alerting air traffic controllers is the first hard proof of cybernetic telecommunications piracies on 9/11.  Their flight control and communications systems had been coopted by the real evildoers, our cybernetic telecommunications pirates.  Failure to employ ethical flight termination capabilities to hijack by remote control the alleged hijackers is the second hard proof of cybernetic telecommunications piracies on 9/11.  See Deepak Sarkar's Real Path to 9/11 at http://www.kolki.com/, especially the section entitled "How Feasible Was Remote Hijacking of Passenger Jets Inside USA on/before 9/11?"

Surely Donald Trump is aware of remote control systems built into Boeing 767 and 757 jets.  As previously mentioned in this introduction, Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News, “I understand airplanes.  I've bought a lot of airplanes.”  But Trump nevertheless remains quiet and uncurious on these important matters.  Not a good sign.  Very sad.  Already I can hear Donald Trump and former Texas/Alabama Air National Guard fighter jet pilot George W. Bush and the international guru of remote control flight termination systems, Dov Zakheim (see http://www.sysplan.com), tell us about the attacking aerial vehicles of 9/11 from the dock of the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal!

Additionally, I can personally attest that the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower WTC 2 was headed right to where I stood next to the New York Regional Office of the United States Air Force on the 37th floor of the Federal Building at Broadway and Duane.  The only other attacking aerial vehicle seen on 9/11 in a high speed descending arc of flight was at the Pentagon, where there are, of course, many other offices of the United States Air Force.  This is a curious coincidence that needs to be sifted very carefully by the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal or in impeachment proceedings of the imperial nonesuch United States Congress.  It looks like both aerial vehicles were guided by homing devices inside United States Air Force offices near where they crashed.

Why has President Trump consistently failed to level with the people of the United States and, indeed, the people of the world, on this most important subject of 9/11?  Instead of telling us the truth about 9/11, Donald Trump has backtracked on his candid television broadcast remarks about explosions in the Twin Towers.  With his "like a can of soup" analogy, Trump has misled the general public concerning the Twin Towers' massive central support columns in the same television broadcast interview.  And Trump revealed that he had about 225 of his own men working alongside the FBI "to get rid of what's there" inside the secured and restricted crime scene at Ground Zero, where he envisioned, before anyone else, “the importance of the monument” -- not the monument itself, but the importance of the monument! -- that would be built there years later.  Here we have at the very least a good prima facie case that Donald J. Trump was an accessory both before and after the shock and awe crimes of 9/11.

If the 9/11 attacks on the United States of America were indeed, as I believe they were, an inside job, then we are talking about treason.  And the resulting wars were literally the passing of the cup of treason abroad, where citizens of nations where the United States imposed regime changes by fraud and force were compelled to flee as refugees or to commit treason by siding with foreign invaders while the loyal citizens, God bless them, were pulverized or made homeless!  9/11 truth undermines whatever moral authority ever claimed by the USA!  The "deep state" praxis of evil has gone too far!

So here is where Europeans can intervene and help themselves and help the people of the United States too.  I urge members of the European Parliament to do all that they can to initiate the International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal in the names of truth, justice, and peace.  This is the right way to reverse the trend of aggressive horizontal asymmetric escalation toward full scale global war, and prevent more entangled folly with the United States-led NATO which can only bring humiliation or worse.

Mr. Trump’s own words in interviews given on 11 and 13 September 2001 provide a great opportunity to initiate investigations on behalf of an International 9/11 Nuremberg Tribunal or impeachment proceedings of the warmongering imperial nonesuch (WIN) United States Congress or both.  To the best of my knowledge and belief, the interviews really happened and the transcripts that I have made and provided are accurate.  I am dismayed but not surprised by the news media's failure to pounce on this information, and by our government's failure to take appropriate action.

Stephen M. St. John
San José, California
19 February 2019

* * * * * * *

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #01 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
18 June 2008.

I write to you, Mr. Attorney General, out of very deep concern that the true account of 9/11 has not been told, that there has been a cover-up, and that the intended result of the attacks is our presence in the Middle East, where six years later our already constructed military bases are being forced on the people of Iraq and the USA with an odiously shameful status of forces agreement.  Your office is where a new and proper investigation of 9/11 can still be launched, and I urge you to move in this direction for the sake of historical truth and the proper administration of justice.

As a citizen of the USA, and as a former federal employee who watched the immediate aftermath of the hit on the south tower, World Trade Center 2, from the southwest corner office on the 37th floor of 26 Federal Plaza, just a stone's throw from the courthouse where you were then presiding as federal judge for the Southern District of New York, I have to say I am bothered by many bits of verified information which have come to my attention.  I believe these matters come under your purview and deserve your personal attention on an urgent basis.

First, I wish to draw your attention to very telling remarks made by President Bush at a town hall meeting in Orlando, Florida, on 4 December 2001, and reiterated in another town hall meeting in Ontario, California, on 5 January 2002, in which he claimed that he saw the first jet hit the north tower, World Trade Center 1, on a TV monitor just before entering the classroom in Florida where, several minutes later, his aide Andrew Card famously delivered news of the hit on the south tower and the foregone conclusion that the USA was under attack.  Bush's puzzling statements, which appear on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id53.html along with links to the White House website where they were obtained, indicate foreknowledge or mental defect or both.

Therefore, I ask, when were you first apprised of these statements?  How has the DoJ probed this matter?  What measures will you take in the immediate future to resolve this issue?

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #02 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
22 June 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
While I await your reply to my first letter to you regarding President Bush's repeated claims that he saw on a TV monitor the first jet hit the WTC north tower in the opening surprise attack of 9/11, which can only mean foreknowledge or mental defect or both, I turn your attention, Mr. Attorney General, to yet another very grave matter of quite the opposite dynamic in which we have not seen what one would normally expect to see:  routine video surveillance evidence of the events of 9/11.

How is it that we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three high security ("Category X") international airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed?  How is it that after nearly seven full years we still have not seen any of this routine video surveillance evidence or heard any explanation as to why we haven't seen such basic evidence?  How can this be explained?

Nearly every person in the world saw a constant barrage of broadcast images of two alleged hijackers passing through a security checkpoint at Portland Maine International Airport, but even these images are problematic with respect to time stamps, an airport employee's adamant testimony as to the suspects' attire and the all too convenient discovery of questionable evidence in the suspects' delayed luggage.  These Portland images simply do not place the suspects in Boston!   Why is there no video surveillance evidence showing that these two individuals seen passing through Portland were at Boston's Logan International Airport on 9/11?

The news media's hyping of the Portland images goes hand in hand with a conspiracy of silence about the unexplained lack of video surveillance evidence at the airports of 9/11.  Of course the media is "free" to conduct its propaganda in support of an ideology calling for world domination by fraud and by force, but the Department of Justice is not.

Let me help you investigate 9/11.

Stephen M. St. John

Update September 2013:  By way of clarification, the surveillance video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time-stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of alleged hijackers at this airport on the morning of 11 September 2001.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #03 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
26 June 2008

To continue, Mr. Attorney General, I recapitulate:  you were appointed by "a man of vision" who says he saw on TV as it happened what no other man on earth saw; namely, the first hit on the north tower WTC 1, and you now preside over the priesthood of the ineffable mysteries of the 9/11 airport surveillance tapes, the US Department of Justice.  That's quite a distinction, isn't it?  As a skeptic who sees no credible evidence showing that any of the passengers said to have boarded the ill fated flights of 9/11 were even at these airports, I cannot help but think there was a high tech framing of Arabs afoot as a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.  Do you understand?

Of course people not bothered by President Bush's darkly mysterious utterances and the sheer lack of routine video surveillance evidence at the airports are also not bothered by the omission of the names of the alleged hijackers in the passenger manifests published by United and American Airlines.  Their fallback position is to cite cell and airphone calls cited in the official conspiracy theory.

But a Canadian university mathematics professor, A. Kee Dewdney, conducted experiments ruling out the possibility of cell phone calls from commercial jets.  A USAF Public Affairs officer at an outdoor Boeing exhibit at Rockefeller Center in 2003 told me he reached the same conclusion after he and colleagues had conducted their own informal experiments.  Dewdney brilliantly infers the use of real time digital voice morphing as the only possible explanation of these "cell phone calls," and his examination of transcripts of such calls, in the manner of the great literary critic I. A. Richards, concludes that the "cell phone" impersonators were not top drawer.  See http://physics911.net.

The renowned 9/11 skeptic David Ray Griffin likewise disposes of one key airphone call by pointing to trial exhibits indicating Barbara Olson's call to her husband Ted, then the Solicitor General, did not connect.  Your own people at DoJ have strong prima facie evidence that Ted Olson is a liar!  See http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html.

Stephen M. St. John
Resume:  http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html
(Inoculated against the Qualifications!)

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #04 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
30 June 2008

Let me turn, Mr. Attorney General, to the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower, WTC 2.  A colleague on the 37th floor of the Federal Building at Duane and Broadway told me shortly afterwards that he had seen this jet making its approach over New York harbor; he repeated with great emphasis that, at first sight, one wing pointed almost straight down to the ground and the other straight up to the sky; his eyewitness testimony of the attacking jet's highly unusual attitude in New York City airspace is corroborated by, among others, eyewitness testimonies of air traffic controllers in the control tower at Newark Airport who saw a sharply banking jet turn across the harbor and slam into WTC 2.

Soon after 9/11, a retired US Army field officer with long experience at the highest levels inside the Pentagon convened a group of military, civilian and commercial aviation professionals, and their conclusion was unanimous:  the flights that hit WTC 2 and the Pentagon could not possibly have been piloted by flight students on their maiden voyages with training limited to routine procedures on flight simulators.  Donn de Grand Pré's group pointed to remote control as the best explanation for the unerring descending arcs made by the jets at speeds normally reserved for high altitude cruising; the G-forces brought to bear would have posed an insurmountable challenge to a human being.

So you see, with no airport video surveillance evidence, and no names of alleged hijackers on airline manifests, and bogus cell and air phone calls, this highly improbable scenario of aerial acrobatics over New York harbor needs a much better explanation than the outrageous conspiracy theory we have been offered.  Considering that the attacking jet was headed right for the USAF office on the 37th floor of the Federal Building, that 9/11 Commission Co-Chairmen Kean and Hamilton expressed doubts about the credibility of USAF testimonies, that President Bush has a history of gaming the upper echelons of NORAD from his air national guard days, and that he says he saw the first jet's surprise attack on WTC 1, I ask, can you, a Bush appointee, pursue 9/11 truth and justice?

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com
Bench 7PM daily NE Corner Central Park Great Lawn, USS Liberty Ballcap

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #05 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
2 July 2008

Mr. Attorney General, can you not admit that there is at least a shadow of a doubt over the official story of 9/11?  Our Commander in Chief said he saw the first hit on WTC 1.  We have no credible airport video surveillance tapes of any of the passengers and no explanation.  We have demonstrably bogus cell and airphone calls.  We have two flights with trajectories into their targets which are consistent with rocket science and not the maiden voyages of flight students.

The most compelling evidence, however, is a video of the collapsing Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7, which Richard A. Siegel filmed from across the Hudson River on a pier in Hoboken.  The explosions that you hear on the soundtrack preceding each building collapse correspond with off the chart seismic readings from Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory in the Palisades.  The free fall speed of these building collapses and at least a dozen other aspects of these collapses, as described by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, are strongly indicative of controlled demolitions.  Moreover, the strong smell like that of an electrical fire which lingered in the air in our neighborhood on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, and which neighbors, merchants and doormen remember to this day, is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation.  Even though we were constantly windward of Ground Zero and 6.8 miles away, this smell lingered for weeks!

Such strong prima facie evidence of controlled demolitions raises the likelihood that the real perpetrators of these horrific crimes had access to the World Trade Center through corporate and/or government entities.  It behooves you to obtain Siegel's original video footage as well as the superb documentaries he has made on 9/11 at his website http://www.911raw.com.  Likewise, your responsibility to use all due diligence to solve the crime of this young century makes it imperative that you visit and study the excellent website of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at http://www.ae911truth.org.

Let's together end the conspiracy of silence and face unwelcome facts.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com

Update February 2014:  I highly recommend Richard Siegel's 9/11 Eyewitness Hoboken, which is still available at http://Kunaki.com/Sales.asp?PID=PX00JI5YPD&PP=1.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #06 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
7 July 2008

Referring to my previous letter (#05) in which I introduced Richard A. Siegel's film footage with audio component as best evidence of controlled demolitions to bring down the Twin Towers and WTC 7, I now ask you, Mr. Attorney General, have you ever seen this film before?  Have you ever even heard of it before last week when I wrote to you about it?  How is it that all the legal proceedings with respect to 9/11 in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, where you presided as judge before becoming Attorney General, are devoid of any consideration of this open source, primary evidence casting substantial doubt on the findings of the 9/11 Commission?

I somehow sense a powerful combination to obstruct justice.  Perhaps a United Nations International Independent Investigation Commission will give Richard A. Siegel's films (http://www.911raw.com) the proper treatment that they deserve nearly seven full years after 9/11.  As already stated in my previous letter, the sounds of explosions correspond perfectly with off-the-chart spikes on the seismic record.  How did you miss this?  How can you keep on missing this?

Additionally, we have numerous and reliable eyewitness accounts of explosions inside the WTC on 9/11.  A trusted colleague heard two loud bangs at the beginning of the attacks.  This evidence is corroborated by the heroic custodian of WTC 1, William Rodriguez, who heard and saw the effects of a powerful explosion in the sub-basement level of WTC 1 immediately before the impact of the first jet.  A tape recording of a conference in Liberty Plaza picked up the two loud bangs which came seconds apart.  Port Authority of New York & New Jersey Police communications transcripts are replete with testimonies of explosions in the sub-basement level at the beginning of the attacks.  (see http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/pa-transcripts)  Look at Richard Siegel's film footage and you will see ground level smoke well before the towers fell.  I could go on and on, but there is not enough space.  Suffice it to say, Osama bin Laden and cohorts had no access to place the charges!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update February 2014:  I highly recommend Richard Siegel's 9/11 Eyewitness Hoboken, which is still available at:
http://Kunaki.com/Sales.asp?PID=PX00JI5YPD&PP=1.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #07 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
10 July 2008

Yesterday's Senate passage of the new FISA law granting retroactive immunity to, among others, the Israeli telecommunications firms Amdocs and Comverse, is a direct blow not only to our Fourth Amendment, but to efforts to get to the full truth of what really happened on 9/11.  I will return to this topic in future letters, but for now, suffice it to say that Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution of the United States prohibits such "ex post facto Laws" without exception.  So just as the US Congress disregards international law, it is totally unhinged from our "supreme Law of the Land" as well.

Once you can get past the denial stage and reckon fully with unexplained lack of routine airport video surveillance evidence on 9/11, abundant evidence of controlled demolitions, bogus cell and airphone calls, high tech phone impersonations, remote control of aerial vehicles and our fearless leader's claim he saw the first hit on the north tower, WTC 1, you have to consider the likelihood that our corporate, government and military organizations were penetrated and compromised.  The real perpetrators carried out a false flag intelligence operation designed to put the blame on Moslem Arabs and give a green light to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.

Once you can entertain this false flag intelligence operation theory, you have to consider who had the motive, means and opportunity to do the crime and cover it up.  This has not been done.

The Zionist state had the motive, means and opportunity to carry out this false flag intelligence operation, but a deeply rooted cultural taboo against blaming Jews makes a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11 a very, very difficult proposition.

Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the 9/11 attacks were "good for Israel."  Benjamin Netanyahu visits your synagogue when he's in New York.  I've been in your synagogue a number of times.  I live nearby.  Of course the Talmudic Law of the Moser weighs very heavily on my mind.  This law prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly, and impinges on our legal, law enforcement and intelligence communities.

Stephen M. St. John

Learn more about the Talmudic Law of the Moser at:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html

Update February 2014:  Yet another illegal ex post facto law was soon to be made to allow Senator Hillary Clinton to become Secretary of State after she had been disqualified for this position when the Senate increased its salary.  Even though I was her constituent at the time, Senator Clinton ignored all my attempts to communicate with her about these letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General, copies of which she regularly received by fax.  Also, the Hebrew word Moser means an informer.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #08 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
14 July 2008

Let me continue, Mr. Attorney General, with the topic of the Talmudic Law of the Moser.  But first, I ask, why do you suppose Americans are preoccupied with alleged fake photos of Iran's most recent missile defense exercises, but have no curiosity whatsoever about total lack of 9/11 airport video surveillance evidence from Boston's Logan and Newark's Liberty International Airports?  Are they just dumb?  Did Osama bin Laden take these tapes to his hideout?  Or is the news & entertainment media creating a protective bubble for the real 9/11 conspirators?  Why can't we see these tapes?

Anyway, most people have never heard of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, and would be very surprised to hear that it is exactly like the Mafioso Code of Omertà.  Back in the time of JFK, FBI Director Hoover denied the existence of the Mafia even though he enjoyed lucrative intercourse with top capos like Frank Costello.  Not until Joe Valacchi broke the Code of Omertà did we find out enough about the Mafia to engage in vigorous prosecutions.  We are dealing with the same thing with this Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew.  This prohibition extends beyond being a "rat" or a "fink"; in more subtle and indirect ways the Law of the Moser enjoins adherents to maintain a conspiracy of silence so as not to draw unwelcome attention to a secret and illegal enterprise or other criminal or anti-social behavior.  (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html)

Clearly such a covenant among Jews to protect their own with a wall of silence is diametrically opposed to the adversarial process of our legal system.  Wouldn't you agree?  Wouldn't such a covenant compromise law enforcement and intelligence operations as well as legal proceedings?  Perhaps an FBI agent or a counter intelligence agent or a prosecuting attorney might conveniently see the wisdom of "not going there" in a particular aspect of a case.  On 9/11, ICTS-International oversaw security at Boston's Logan International Airport.  ICTS was owned and operated by Zionist Jews with intelligence backgrounds.  Does the Law of the Moser explain missing video evidence?

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com

Update September 2013:  According to Wikipedia, the Luciano crime family capo Frank Costello was also a close friend of syndicated columnist and freelance writer John Miller, the father of the current CBS News senior correspondent (and former FBI official) John Miller, whose godmother was Costello's wife.  It's interesting how crime and entertainment stay in the family, and how the opium trade in Afghanistan was quickly revived after the Taliban had nearly eradicated it before 9/11!

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #09 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
17 July 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I just returned from a visit to Rockefeller Center where I checked my mailbox and was very disappointed to find that you have yet to respond to any of my open letters on 9/11!  Let me point out to you that these open letters are sent by fax and email to, among others, nearly every embassy in Washington and mission to the UN here in New York.  So I can truly say the international community is witness to my quest for truth and justice with respect to 9/11.

So let me ask you, am I asking for the moon by asking you repeatedly to show video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers at ANY of the three airports from which the ill fated flights of 9/11 are said to have departed?  Short of that, am I asking for Uranus when I ask you for an explanation as to why we cannot see such evidence in the form of routine airport surveillance videos?

My boss, a federal employee with the US Department of Commerce, was reportedly on Flight 93 out of Newark's Liberty International Airport.  Why have I never seen video surveillance evidence of her anywhere inside Newark Airport?  Why have my requests to see such proof been ignored for so long?  After nearly seven full years, can we not conclude that there is something radically wrong about the official investigation of 9/11?  I know I never saw my boss again after 9/11, but I do not believe a single word about what supposedly happened to her and whoever else was on Flight 93.  Certainly the cell phone call my boss reportedly made from Flight 93 was absolutely impossible to make, and impersonation by digital voice morphing is the best explanation.

As a Federal Judge, Mr. Attorney General, surely you are aware that tampering with or withholding evidence is a very serious offense.  I want you to answer my questions.  If you don't answer them, I will be forced to conclude that you are obstructing justice on behalf of the man who appointed you Attorney General, the same one who twice said he saw on a TV monitor the first jet hit on the north tower WTC 1, the hit that took the world by surprise.  Let the international community be my witness!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id55.html

“Thus saith the Lord unto Gog (Ashkenazi Jewry), in that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, willt thou not know it?”

Update September 2013:  Again, by way of clarification, I note that the surveillance video of alleged 9/11 hijackers at Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of their having been there on the morning of 11 September 2001.  The quotation at the bottom is from the Book of Ezekiel 38:14.  I introduce it because I believe that knowing the difference between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews is vital for understanding the turmoil in the Middle East.  The link is to my article Ersatz Israel in which I explain the basic difference between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #10 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
21 July 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
"Shock & Awe" did not begin in Baghdad on 19 March 2003; rather, it began on 9/11 and continues with British bombers dressed as Arabs, two of whom were caught in the act by the Iraqi police in Basra on 19 September 2005.  So how did this "Shock & Awe" tactic originate?  How does it continue to promote the "Grand Chessboard" strategy (otherwise known as the Zionist Neoconservative ideology of world domination) with invasions of the Middle East?

In January of 2004 former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed President Bush's intention of putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, which he expressed at his very first high level meeting in February, 2001, more than six full months before 9/11.  President Bush's thoroughly illegal intention to initiate aggressive war in the Middle East had been totally disguised during his 2000 presidential campaign.  Inasmuch as 9/11 presented Bush with an opportunity to go ahead with his plan, would it not be logical to examine the President's Foreign Affairs adviser during that presidential campaign?  Has the Department of Justice ever interrogated that man, Dov Zakheim?

Exactly one year before 9/11, Zakheim signed a document published by the Project for the New American Century which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" would help speed the implementation of its stated goal of global military dominance.  Is this not evidence enough that Zakheim and his Zionist Neoconservative peers were prompting Bush toward invasion and occupation in the Middle East?  Is it not apparent that their plan required secrecy at least until Bush occupied the Oval Office?  Don't O'Neill's revelations suggest the possibility that the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 might have been staged as a false flag intelligence operation to create a pretext for war?  And when you consider that at least two of the aerial vehicles involved in the attacks exhibited trajectories more in keeping with guided missiles than flight students on their maiden voyages, wouldn't Zakheim's background in remote control and missile technologies be deserving of close scrutiny?  Answer!

Please visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html and scroll to fax broadcast for 17 September 2006 for more information on British bombers in Basra, and 3 March 2008 for Paul O'Neill's testimony.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  For your convenience, click here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
for O'Neill's testimony

and here:
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/BritishBombers.htm#britishbombs
for more information about the British bombers dressed as Arabs in Basra, Iraq.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #11 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
24 July 2008

So let me recapitulate already, Mr. Attorney General.  George W. Bush took on Dov Zakheim as foreign affairs advisor in his 2000 presidential campaign and in September of that year the Dovster endorsed "a new Pearl Harbor" as a catalyst to achieve desired transformations conducive to the Zionist Neoconservative ideology of world domination.  A year later President Bush saw on TV in real time the first jet plow into the north tower WTC 1, which began the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11!  Richard Siegel's film captures sounds of explosives that correlate perfectly with off the chart spikes on the seismic record.  Cell phone calls from the hijacked planes are technically not possible and impersonation by real time digital voice morphing offers the only plausible explanation.  A DoJ trial exhibit indicates Barbara Olsen's airphone call did not connect, and that her husband Ted's rendition of his conversation with her is sheer fabrication from the Solicitor General.  And the flights hitting the Pentagon and the south tower, WTC 2, had high speed, arcing and descending trajectories more in keeping with remote controlled missiles than flight students on their maiden voyages.

The last item causes me to wonder about Zakheim's background in remote control missile technology from his years spent with System Planning Corporation.  Did the FBI identify all known human beings on this planet Earth with expertise in the area of remote control of aerial vehicles?  If so, what criteria did the FBI use to narrow the range of suspects?  May I review the findings?

In addition to his longing for "a new Pearl Harbor" and his membership in the small universe of individuals capable of remote control of aerial vehicles that perform aerial acrobatics such as what was witnessed on 9/11 over New York harbor and Washington, Dov Zakheim was Comptroller of the Pentagon in the weeks and months leading up to 9/11.  The very day before 9/11, his immediate boss, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, announced that the Pentagon could not account for $1.2 trillion.  Motive, means and opportunity converge between the ears of Dov Zakheim!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id7.html and read A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report sent to Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom in December 2004.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update January 2014:  Correction:  the figure is $2.3 trillion, not $1.2 trillion.  Hear Rumsfeld's 10 September 2001 speech at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #12 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
27 July 2008

I ask you, Mr. Attorney General, are the Russians and Chinese really behind President Bush as he ratchets up the pressure of sanctions on Iran in the Security Council?

Or, remembering Belgrade in 1997, do they want to see how their supersonic missiles perform in Iranian hands against unwanted occupation forces in Mesopotamia and the Persian Gulf?

And what devil is behind this buildup of tensions conducive to war?

The Iranians, who conform perfectly with NPT and IAEA obligations, are being asked to explain documents on nuclear weapons studies of unknown provenance given from unknown sources to the IAEA, or else face sanctions and pressures conducive to war.  How unfair!

After the lies about 9/11 and WMDs in Iraq which resulted in unjustified and illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, do I see a pattern here?

Are we witnessing more of the same full spectrum fraud and force according to the nefarious goals of the Grand Chessboard cliques and the Zionist Neoconservative special groups?

Isn't secret evidence, like the wall of silence imposed by the Talmudic law of the Moser, diametrically opposed to truth and justice and the real American way?

The 9/11 Commission saved the world from tons of paper by abbreviating the name Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to KSM.  But its fixation on KSM produced nothing more than hearsay; this guiding star of the 9/11 Commission did not provide even a scintilla of evidence showing 19 Arabs hijacked planes on 9/11.

Not only have we never seen ANY credible airport video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers -- let alone the 19 hijackers -- we have never had the opportunity to hear KSM speak.  This is outrageous!

And to top it all off, our praxis of evil exported the bogus official account of 9/11 with "substitute testimony" of KSM from New York to Germany where a court -- just following orders -- overturned Munir Motassadeq's two successful acquittals.

The Iranians, whose nuclear particle physicists now tread the paths made by Heisenberg, have no problem figuring out the strange 5+1 configuration at the UN's nucleus, where such critical mass voids justice and peace.

Read about the Talmudic law of the Moser at:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.

Stephen M. St. John
www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #13 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
29 July 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me fast forward from one Zionist with motive, means and opportunity to pull off a false flag operation like 9/11, Dov Zakheim, to another, Larry Silverstein.  Now that we know from Paul O'Neil that President Bush said in so many words "find me a way to go into Iraq" in early February 2001, we only have to follow developments to see what really happened.

Yet another Zionist and high level Republican Party functionary, Lewis Eisenberg, also headed the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, which owns the World Trade Center complex.  The Twin Towers were considered to be "White Elephants" because they were beset with many problems, including the very costly legal requirement of asbestos removal.  Among those concerned, this general condition was known for years.  And as winter turned to spring in 2001, Eisenberg sought to lease the WTC to Silverstein.  Lucky Larry promptly took out insurance against terrorist events when the deal was done, and a 49 day countdown started toward fulfillment of President Bush's command to "find me a way to go into Iraq."

During this seven week interval before 9/11, there were reports of powerdowns and evacuations of entire floors as engineers and workmen performed tasks that, in hindsight, appear to have involved the planting of explosive charges to demolish the buildings.  Witnesses have come forward and their testimonies are known even though they were assiduously avoided by the 9/11 Commission.  Was 9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow, yet another Zionist, imposing a wall of silence to protect a Zionist operation according to the Talmudic law of the Moser?  Did Zelikow hide Zionist fabrication of a casus belli?

I have Lucky Larry's unlisted home phone number but he did not respond to a message I left for him.  I have the Dovster's home and business numbers and he, likewise, chose not to respond to my messages.  Will you, Mr. Attorney General, give me a mandate to conduct an effective investigation of 9/11?  I can assure you, sir, that I have been thoroughly inoculated against the qualifications!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and read about the Talmudic law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly.

Visit http://www-come-and-hear.com for general Talmud Awareness.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  Casus belli is a legal term from the Latin language and means "cause of war."
Update July 2018:  The link to the excellent website www.come-and-hear.com does not work from this page, but if you enter the url in your browser you will find that it works.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #14 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
3 August 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
The World Trade Center was a beacon on the far horizon for travelers coming from as far away as the Tappan Zee and the Garden State Arts Center.  If the war on terror were real, the best response would have been to rebuild the Twin Towers the way they were as quickly as WTC 7 was rebuilt.

But the real war is on our civil liberties, and an open wound lingering at ground zero serves the cause in spades, as though to make that dreadful morning of 9/11 last.

Long ago my grandfather would walk each workday across the Williamsburg Bridge in the morning twilight to open Meckel's grocery store on Rivington Street on the Lower East Side of Manhattan.  This is where the FBI, sipping fresh coffee with their Devil Dogs, would stake out the Rosenbergs, our Zionist buddies who passed nuclear weapons plans to the Soviet Union.  Then the whole block was raised to make way for public housing.  Only a backyard tree remains near the mailbox in the park inside the Samuel Gompers Houses complex.

Change happens, and we must deal with it.

So how exactly did the World Trade Center metamorphose into a patriotic symbol and rallying point for unjustified invasions and occupations in the Middle East?

How is it that the all too new tenant Larry Silverstein and not the owner, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, took out the insurance policy against terrorism?

How is it that one Zionist, Lewis Eisenberg, offered this sweetheart deal involving the public trust to another Zionist, Lucky Larry Silverstein, in the weeks and months after President Bush, according to Paul O'Neill, said "find me a way to go into Iraq"?

And in the 49 day countdown from this unprecedented deal to 9/11, why all the heavy activity of engineers and workcrews necessitating powerdowns and evacuations of whole floors, as witnessed by Scott Forbes of Fiduciary Trust?  Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore him after he tried to contact them?

Why didn't the insurance companies avail themselves of Rick Siegel's film showing controlled demolition with explosions matching off-the-chart spikes on the seismic record?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html to read about the Talmudic law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly.  This would include not following a lead or otherwise ignoring key evidence in a crime.  The Talmudic law of the Moser, like the Mafioso code of Omertà, explains the difficulties we've encountered in law enforcement, intelligence, the judiciary and the news media.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  My mention in this letter of my grandfather's store on the Lower East Side of Manhattan where the FBI would stake out the Rosenberg spy ring evidently made waves bringing a message in a bottle.  Weeks later, Morton Sobell confessed that he and Julius Rosenberg were indeed spies for the Soviet Union after decades of denial and claims of innocence.  The matter was published in the New York Times of 11 September 2008, the seventh anniversary of the shock & awe cybernetic piracies known as "9/11"!  The timing of the article suggests to me a powerful reminder -- conveyed silently between the lines -- of the efficacy of the Talmudic law of the Moser.  See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/12/nyregion/12spy.html?pagewanted=all.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #15 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
5 August 2008

Let me, Mr. Attorney General, recapitulate already:

Our fearless leader who said in early February 2001 "find me a way to go into Iraq" and who appointed you in 2007 says he saw on live TV the first jet hit WTC 1;

there is no credible video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers including hijackers at Logan, Liberty or Dulles airports;

Richard Siegel's film records controlled demolitions of the Twin Towers and the explosions -- not the collapses of buildings pulverized in mid air -- match off-the-chart seismic readings and observations of numerous witnesses;

two jets are flown like remote controlled missiles into WTC 2 and then the Pentagon;

and all of this follows a 49 day countdown after Larry Silverstein consummates a highly unusual deal with the Port Authority, loads up on insurance coverage and oversees highly suspicious engineering throughout the WTC.

There is a Zionist connection throughout all of this, and the Talmudic law of the Moser very likely explains why the 9/11 Commission and the insurance companies ignored, or were led to ignore, all of these facts and circumstances.

Bibi Netanyahu, who visits your synagogue whenever he's in New York, says 9/11 was "good for Israel."  Was there something brewing before 9/11 that Netanyahu considered "not good for Israel"?

Was there another countdown besides Silverstein's 49 day wait?

The annual Judicial Conference met briefly at the Supreme Court on the morning of 9/11 before the US Marshall evacuated Chief Justice Rehnquist and two dozen of the most senior federal judges in the USA through a side entrance.

Hanging in the balance in the months and weeks leading up to this Judicial Conference was a potential public relations disaster for the Zionists; namely, the distinct possibility that my petition/complaint of judicial misconduct before the Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit in Atlanta would be brought to the attention of the Chief Justice and the twenty four chief judges.

The subject matter within the complaint pertains to the Zionist attack on the USS Liberty, the nearly simultaneous taking of the Golan 1 2 3, and the question of peace in the Middle East.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html to read petition/complaint of judicial misconduct file pertaining to the attack on the USS Liberty, the nearly simultaneous taking of the Golan 1 2 3, and the question of peace in the Middle East.

Large file loads slowly.  Be patient!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  The USS Liberty story is the missing piece of the Middle East peace puzzle.  The troubles in Syria today reflect the USA's failure to learn the lesson of the USS Liberty incident.  See http://www.show-the-house.com/id5.html.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #16 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
10 August 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
As I pointed out in my previous letter, in addition to Lucky Larry Silverstein's 49 day countdown to 9/11 after acquiring Ground Zero, there was another countdown to the 9/11 Judicial Conference where my petition/complaint relative to the USS Liberty cover-up could very well have been raised had the meeting continued without interruption.  Such a development would have been a great victory for the USS Liberty Veterans Association and a public-relations disaster for Zionists everywhere.  Their war crimes would have been uncovered.

This would not have been the first time a big Zionist "event" stole the thunder of the USS Liberty survivors' just cause.  The unprovoked "war of choice" against Lebanon in June of 1982 made the headline of the Los Angeles Times, thereby pushing to a lower corner of the front page a report on the very first reunion of the USS Liberty Veterans Association.  So from my unique point of view, you must understand, 9/11 spun the USS Liberty story as much as it spun the nation's mood to fight for the Zionists and their psychopathic Neoconservative "Grand Chessboard" ideology of world domination.  With no USS Liberty lessons learned, Americans have difficulty grasping all of 9/11.

Once you accept the logic of 9/11 as a false flag intelligence operation to manufacture cause and consent for war, you will see a similarity in the USS Liberty story.  First, a huge explosion had to be set off in Zionist occupied Al Arish in order to place a suspicious and threatening aura on the unarmed ship, which then became the occasion for an unlikely series of errors leading to the attack.  Everything hinged on that explosion, both the deliberate attack to conceal the true nature of the Golan operation, and all the contrived explanations that followed.  And, of course, our foreign policy for the past seven years has hinged on the events of 9/11, especially the explosions resulting in off-the-chart spikes on the seismic record, the kind of explosions which required inside access to the targets.  In other words, an inside job!  Not the Arabs, but those who would have us fight them.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id58.html and view an excellent documentary film (52 minutes) on the deliberate Zionist attack on the USS Liberty and the ensuing cover-up of war crimes.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update January 2014:  Again, I say that with no USS Liberty lessons learned, Americans have difficulty grasping not only all of 9/11 but also the Realpolitik behind the current aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic.  Please see
http://www.show-the-house.com/id5.html.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #17 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
14 August 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
While I persist with these unrequited letters urging you to appoint me to head a proper investigation of 9/11 for the sake of historical truth and the pursuit of justice, let us together be mindful of those who have given up all hope that the "proper authorities" will ever heed their demands for answers to thousands of questions about 9/11.

In this regard I am happy to report that a group of concerned citizens has organized an initiative to place a referendum on New York City's November ballot which calls for the establishment of a new and improved Commission to conduct a proper investigation of the events of 9/11.

Their success in this truly patriotic endeavor looks very likely for this November's General Election or possibly next year's Mayoral Election.  Their website address is http://www.nyc911initiative.org; their phone number is 646 537 1755.

So, Mr. Attorney General, if you really don't know whom to call to start a real investigation of 9/11, I, your neighbor right here on the Upper East Side of New York, invite you to sign our petition to place this 9/11 referendum on the ballot.

If you have ghosts at the Department of Justice and you really don't know whom to call, then join our effort to establish a "proper authority"; namely, a Citizens of New York 9/11 Commission.

Just call me when you're back home and I'll be right over to get your signature.  Or, if you like, I'll take the shuttle down to Washington and meet you there.

I just want you to know that if this Citizen's 9/11 Investigatory Commission is indeed formed and successfully concludes its work and achieves its stated goals, it will have done so despite the established proper authorities; namely, you and the US Department of Justice.

You of course can turn this around right now and start a proper investigation yourself.  I just want to serve notice that your opportunity to do so is now.

So let's begin.  Where are the routine video surveillance tapes showing ANY of the passengers let alone hijackers at Newark's Liberty International Airport?

After seven years, why haven't we seen the tapes or heard an explanation why we haven't seen them?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id7.html and read A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report sent to members of the UK Parliament, House of Commons, in December 2004.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  Unfortunately the New York citizens’ initiative to place a referendum on whether to create a new and a real investigation of 9/11 on the 2008 election ballot did not work out.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #18 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
18 August 2008

If you saw Oliver Stone's movie JFK, Mr. Attorney General, you might remember actor Ed Asner's portrayal of Guy Bannister, former head of the Chicago office of the FBI and then head of the CIA's clandestine operations directed against Castro's Cuba in the early 1960s.

New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison later discovered that pro-Castro literature being handed out by Lee Harvey Oswald on the streets of New Orleans in the summer of 1963 had been printed inside Bannister's Camp Street headquarters.  Oswald was being set up to appear to the world as a pro-Castro agitator months before the JFK assassination.

The anti-Castro personnel with whom Oswald worked were preparing the public persona of a patsy.  As I point out in my 2005 letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, George H. W. Bush and Jack Ruby were instrumental in promoting this false public persona of Oswald within hours of his arrest.  (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id6.html.)

Did a similar kind of "sheep dipping" operation take place in the years and months leading up to 9/11?  This question came to mind when I read an excerpt from Mark H. Gaffney's forthcoming book The 9/11 Mystery Plane & the Vanishing of America, particularly in the passage describing the intelligence operation known as Able Danger.

Gaffney points out the direction an honest and effective investigation of 9/11 will take, and affirms the likelihood of foreknowledge of 9/11 within elements of the US military and intelligence community.  This is essential reading for anyone interested in dealing with a colossal miscarriage of justice and total lack of credible airport security video evidence of passengers or hijackers.  (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id60.html.)

I suppose the only thing worse than doing 9/11 is doing 9/11 and putting the blame on someone else.

Putting the blame on Arabs is truly a vile and despicable act.  This is true anti-Semitism at its worst.

It takes a praxis of evil to indicate an axis of evil on which to project its malevolent will.  Our Zionist buddies had motive, means, opportunity and a Talmudic code of silence.  Let's examine 'em!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id7.html and read A Dissenting Critique of the 9/11 Commission Report, an edition sent to the UK Parliament, House of Commons, in December 2004.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #19 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
22 August 2008

Mr. Attorney General,
Yesterday's release of the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) report on the mysterious collapse of World Trade Center 7 is a classic example of what the founding fathers of the USA sought to prevent happening in our republic when they included two prohibitions against ex post facto laws in Article I, sections 9 and 10 of our Constitution.

This lame NIST report rests on the false assumption that there was no existing agency authorized to investigate Ground Zero in the long interval between the 9/11 attacks and the 1 October 2002 passage of the National Construction Safety Team Act.

Our Congress acted in combination with other officials to countenance the removal of evidence from a crime scene and thereby thwarted a proper criminal investigation.

Such corruption supported the goals of the war mongers.

A scientific report teetering on such shaky legal foundation naturally has as much to hide as it reveals, and I list the notable lies, omissions and unsupported assertions.

Contrary to what the report says, there were indeed eyewitness accounts of explosions heard and shock waves seen right before WTC 7 went down at 5:21 PM on 11 September 2001.

Not mentioned were numerous testimonies indicating foreknowledge of the impending implosion, including Larry Silverstein's famous admission that a decision was made to "pull it"; i.e., bring down WTC 7 by controlled demolition.  How the BBC managed to report the collapse as a fait accompli twenty minutes before it actually happened remains an unexplained mystery.

Pools of molten steel in the sub-basements of WTC 1, 2 & 7 remained for seven full weeks, a thermal effect studiously ignored by the NIST nincompoops.

Why did Mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani prefer 75 Barclay Street to his expensive, state of the art emergency command post on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 before any damage was inflicted on the building?

What is the seismic record of the WTC 7 event, and why are these matters beyond the scope of the report?

What combustible contents or source of energy can induce the temperature of 900°C that NIST reports?

History shows that severe fires deform but do not collapse steel structures.  How can NIST conceivably make the leap to fire-induced mechanical collapse at free fall speed?

This is nuts!

Please visit http://www.ae911truth.org for thoughtful and apolitical assessments of the WTC building collapses by professional architects and engineers.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update January 2014:  In these letters to Mr. Mukasey (including one update) we have seen a pattern of illegal ex post facto laws relating to the telecommunications industry, Hillary Clinton's eligibility to be Secretary of State and NIST's authority to conduct investigations of the WTC building collapses on 9/11, which rested on legislation sponsored by the then Senator from New York in May of 2002.  This particular letter contains a careless mistake by claiming the seismic record was not in the scope of NIST's report.  Indeed NIST did consider the seismic record, albeit in a way that erroneously ruled out explosions as the cause.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #20 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
2 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me direct your attention to my formal comment on the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) "Final Report" on the mysterious collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building, otherwise known as World Trade Center 7,  at 5:20:42 EDT on the 11th of September, 2001.

Please see http://www.show-the-house.com/id65.html.

The law enabling the NIST investigation, at least as far as the WTC is concerned, is an ex post facto law.  As a federal judge, you ought to be aware that our Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws.  The dynamic behind such legal trickery, of course, is a combination to suppress the adversarial and discovery processes of our legal system with a thin veneer of authority from NIST instead of our duly established law enforcement agencies.

This is not the right way to discover what really happened on 9/11, and it appears to me that this method is meant to protect the real perpetrators of 9/11.  It appears at least on the surface that you had a hand in this in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Did you release the "Dancing Israelis of Liberty State Park"?  Did the WTC insurance companies present as evidence Richard A. Siegel's film of the Twin Towers' collapses?

The only thing worse than doing 9/11 is doing 9/11 and putting the blame on someone else.  That would be a high tech lynching motivated by anti-Arab anti-Semitism.

Moreover, the conspiracy of silence supporting the cover-up reeks of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing directly or indirectly on another Jew to a non-Jew.  Is this not your persuasion?  Is it not true that Benjamin Netanyahu said 9/11 was "good for Israel"?

Since when are those with motive, means and opportunity to commit a crime, and who actually benefited from it in their own perverse way, not held to account?  How else do you explain palming off on the American people the lies contained in this NIST Report?

The seismic record clearly indicates blast events coinciding not just with the collapse of WTC 7, but also with the jet impacts and collapses of the Twin Towers as well.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  The "Dancing Israelis of Liberty State Park" are Oded Ellner, Paul Kurzberg, Sivan Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel and Omer Gavriel Marmari.  All five were arrested on 9/11 in New Jersey by officers of the East Rutherford Police Department as reported by the Bergan Record after eyewitnesses reported their having seen them filming the jet attacks on the World Trade Center in a celebratory manner.  These men were held for questioning by the FBI and finally released in November 2001.  Upon their return to Israel, three of them were interviewed by the Israeli TV journalist Yair Lapid, who is now the Finance Minister of Israel as of March 2013.  During this interview, one of the three, Oded Ellner, admitted to Lapid that "our purpose was to document the event"; by "event" Ellner meant the attacks on the World Trade Center.  See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09g5y2BhzCU.

Update January 2014:  The appellation "Dancing Israelis of Liberty State Park" may indeed be an example of Zionist agent Cass Sunstein's "cognitive dissonance" used to create confusion among 9/11 skeptics.  New information from Veterans Today places the filming of the 9/11 attacks in New York at the Doric apartment complex in Union City, New Jersey.  Please see:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/10/the-dancing-israelis-a-celebration-of-murder/.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #21 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
9 September 2008

Mr. Attorney General,
I direct your attention again to my formal comment on the NIST "Final Report" on the mysterious collapse of WTC 7, at http://www.show-the-house.com/id65.html.

In part 5, I note NIST's false and misleading statements:  "Blast from the smallest charge capable of failing the critical column would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile.  There were no witness reports of such a loud noise, nor was such a noise heard on the audio tracks of video recordings of the WTC 7 collapse."

To this I reiterate my comment that there were indeed competent and reliable eyewitnesses who heard explosions and saw or felt shock waves from the explosions.  And here I present to you the names of two such witnesses, NYC Housing Authority official Barry Jennings and NYC Corporate Counsel Michael Hess, and their recorded testimonies in Jason Bermas's 9/11 documentary film Fabled Enemies.

(See from 1:19:36 to 1:30:30 at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=fabled+enemies&hl=en&emb=0#.)

As you are about to hear, both men were in WTC 7 when the Twin Towers were attacked on Black Tuesday morning.

They made their way to the New York City Office of Emergency Management's brand new, high tech Emergency Operation Center on the 23rd floor, but were amazed to find it deserted with abandoned cups of still steaming coffee.

At this point, no steel structured building had ever collapsed anywhere at anytime in history, and WTC 7 had not been damaged at all.

But as Jennings and Hess made their way down to join the exodus at ground level, they were turned back by a powerful explosion on the 8th floor.  Then they were stranded for about 90 minutes before rescue by the FDNY.

During that time, Mr. Jennings said "all the time I'm hearing all types of explosions."  Neither had instruments to measure decibels, but that does not diminish their testimonies.

Mr. Jennings found the 9/11 Commission to be intimidating.  NIST simply continued the pattern of avoidance of testimonies that did not fit its hypothesis.

Clearly, certain credible eyewitness, video, audio, seismic and scientific evidence was excluded.  This is a shameful crime!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn how the Talmudic Law of the Moser engenders a conspiracy of silence among Jews against non-Jews, which is a hell of a way to conduct a Warren Commission or 9/11 Commission investigation!

Stephen M. St. John
www.show-the-house.com

Update September 2013:  The link above to the documentary film Fabled Enemies is corrupted.  Please try http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28tE0fKpISM instead.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #22 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
11 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
On this 7th anniversary of 9/11, let us recall the words of Isaiah:

"And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every high hill, rivers and streams of waters on the day of the great slaughter, when the towers fall.  Moreover, the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, on the day that the Lord binds up the breach of his people, and heals the stroke of their wound."  (Isaiah 30:25-26)

Indeed Muslim indignation made the idea of the 9/11 attacks plausible as blowback, but were we deceived as to what really happened?  Can healing ever preclude truth?  Can justice evade the truth in a conspiracy of silence?  Can there be peace without justice?

David Ray Griffin has established himself as a meticulous seeker of truth about 9/11 and is better known around the world than in the USA because of the bridle on the jaws of the people and the press.

Griffin's numerous works on 9/11 are a very worthy template for you to use in a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11, and I therefore urge you, as I urge all Americans, to open your eyes and ears to what this accomplished professor is saying.  Inasmuch as the airport gates of 9/11 are really where the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began, our national honor demands a rigorous examination of what actually took place that day, so the truth can be known and justice pursued.

Professor Griffin's recent article Was America attacked by Muslims on 9/11? demonstrates with Holmesian shrewdness that evidence of 19 Arab hijackers is remarkably weak.  (See http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20722.htm.)  A false assumption that led to the destruction of Afghanistan and Iraq falls apart under his 16 questions.

Fabricated evidence put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.  We need to deal with the consequences now.

Griffin has rendered a valuable public service by confronting unpleasant truths about 9/11.  Read The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé (Northampton: Olive Branch, 2008).

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn how the Talmudic Law of the Moser engenders an Omertà-like conspiracy of silence among Jews against non-Jews, which is a hell of a way to conduct a Warren Commission or 9/11 Commission investigation!

Update September 2013:  A subtle reminder of the efficacy of the Talmudic law of the Moser came on the very same day that I wrote and faxed this letter, which was the seventh anniversary of the cybernetic piracies known as "9/11."  This reminder was in the form of a New York Times article on Morton Sobell's confession after decades of denial that he and Julius Rosenberg were indeed spies for the Soviets!

See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/12/nyregion/12spy.html?pagewanted=all.

Also see my previous letter #14 to Mr. Mukasey of 3 August 2008.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #23 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
15 September 2008

I trust, Mr. Attorney General, that you had a fine 7th Anniversary of 9/11 with your fellow Zionists, some of whom, like Bibi Netanyahu, said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel."  It seems he thinks 9/11 was worth it.

The Beebster's most recent memorable quote (16 April 2008) can be read at http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/975574.html.  Fawning American politicians beware!

A potential public relations disaster for the Zionists hanged in the balance on the morning of 9/11.  For had my petition at the Judicial Council of the 11th Circuit relative to the USS Liberty cover-up been raised at the annual Judicial Conference, which just happened to meet on the morning of 9/11, American public support for Israel might have begun to entail certain reasonable conditions.

Instead, public opinion swung madly in favor of the Zionists (i.e., against Arabs and Muslims) even as a federal marshal evacuated Chief Justice Rehnquist and 26 of the most senior federal judges in the nation out a side entrance of the Supreme Court building.

Mission accomplished!  You can read about this on my website at:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html.

And what lengths this PR exercise took!

William Rodriguez, the custodian of WTC 1, heard two explosions, one under his feet where he stood in the sub-basement, and then another from above, which was the impact of the attacking aerial vehicle.  My colleague and many other witnesses also heard two loud bangs.

Then within seconds a co-worker, Felipe David, appeared before Mr. Rodriguez with his flesh hanging from his face, arms and hands, the result of a fire flash from an elevator shaft.  This is the kind of burn wound described at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The explosion preceding the jet impact was a bomb that registered on the seismograph at the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory and burned Mr. David all at once.  Mini nukes began a process of undermining the steel core columns of the Twin Towers.

The 9/11 Commission excluded this evidence of high tech war crimes because Osama bin Laden would not even think to do them.

9/11 was an inside job!

Stephen M. St. John
www.show-the-house.com

Update September 2013:  William Rodriguez, the "key man" and heroic last survivor of the north tower WTC 1, maintains a website at http://www.william911.com.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #24 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
18 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Short of a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11 by you and the US Department of Justice, or by the US Congress or by a UN International Independent Investigation Commission, I've been gathering signatures of registered voters living in New York City for a petition to place a referendum on the ballot for the creation of a citizens' commission of investigation.

I do my canvassing in Central Park at the northeast corner of the Great Lawn, and there I have met many, many very interesting people.  One was the New York Times reporter Howard O. Stier (rhymes with higher).

There's an expression, the nose knows.  But I cannot think of a better example of opposing noses than mine and Mr. Stier's.  He smelled the smell of 9/11 on the Upper West Side just as I did on the Upper East Side.

Both locations are windward of ground zero, yet this smell drifted seven miles north against the prevailing winds and, in my experience, as well as my neighbors', lingered for weeks.  I had flashbacks of the Lionel train set of my childhood in the 1950s because the smell of 9/11 was quite similar to what exuded from the transformer, like an electrical fire.

But Mr. Stier describes the sweet smell of the burnt flesh of the victims in the Twin Towers!  He likened the smell to what he experienced on a visit to a crematorium.  As I listened to Stier, I recalled Frank Sinatra singing, "It seems to me I've heard that song before; it's from an old, familiar score..."!

It is far fetched to think the scent of burnt human flesh can drift seven miles against the wind and linger for weeks.  And here I recall burn victim Felipe David, whom I mentioned in my previous letter.  Mr. David's burns are very much like those described at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  Moreover, the heavy metal smell like that of an electrical fire is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation.  So were the spikes on the seismograph.  And, of course, nuclear bombs now come in all sizes and shapes and colors to suit one's specific need.

Our national honor requires a proper investigation of 9/11, an inside job requiring access as well as motive, means and opportunity to start a war against Arabs.

Stephen M. St. John

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html and read how Zionists faced a possible USS Liberty public relations disaster on the morning of 9/11 but saw the tables turned in their favor right after the attacks.

Update January 2014:  In retrospect, and in consideration of Howard O. Stier's apparent attempt to conflate 9/11 and the Shoah so as to stir emotions, let me be frank.  You only need to know three things to understand the Shoah according to the pure Jewish faith.  One, whatever has happened to the Jews, or will happen to them, for better or for worse, is explained in chapter 26 of the Book of Leviticus.  Two, any other reason given for what has happened to the Jews, or will happen to them, is blasphemy.  Three, the word "holocaust" is a Greek word meaning "a burnt whole" and, because it usually refers in literature to animal sacrifices to a Greek god such as Zeus or Poseidon or Ares, it is highly offensive to the jealous God of Israel.  Furthermore, the holy scriptures are replete with references to offerings "made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the Lord," which are quite different from the putative smell of victims at Ground Zero in New York City.  Even Elie Wiesel is an agnostic on this point, for in his book La Nuit, he makes no reference to his olfactory sense at all as he relates how he was forced to walk amidst pits of burning babies and adult humans.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #25 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
22 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
If ever I saw a guilty face, it is the face of Ehud Olmert, who just resigned as Prime Minister.

But all this business about Morris Talansky is a smokescreen, for both Olmert and Talansky are closely tied to one Menachem J. Atzmon, the Chairman of ICTS International, the "Dutch" airport security company that controlled the airport gates where the 9/11 operation – and long laid plans to invade the Middle East – commenced.

And Olmert's former Likud colleague Bibi Netanyahu has said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel."

Of course Atzmon's contractual obligations with the airports give his security personnel access and therefore means to go above and beyond ordinary routine.  Perhaps this explains the complete lack of credible routine video surveillance evidence of any of the passengers – let alone hijackers – at these airports.

Is the Talmudic law of the Moser behind the thwarted discovery process with respect to this unexplained lack of routine video surveillance evidence?  Did the Mossad do 9/11?

The recent, earthshaking revelation of 91 year old Morton Sobell that he and Julius Rosenberg were indeed Soviet spies sheds light in all directions.

These "Commies" were all Talmud Jews adhering to the Law of the Moser.  Two weeks before Rosenberg and his wife's execution on 19 June 1953, your predecessor Attorney General Herbert Brownell sent David Bennett, Director of the Bureau of Prisons, to offer Rosenberg a deal to cooperate in our government's investigation of their spy ring.  Even though such cooperation would have been solid grounds for clemency, Rosenberg refused.

In his 5 June 1953 letter to his attorney Emmanuel H. Bloch, Rosenberg summed up his Sing Sing meeting with Bennett: "in so many words he said, only if I become an informer, do and say things that satisfy the officials in Washington, then they will let us live."

(For full text of letter go to:
http://192.220.64.45/collections/disputes/sobel-hjc.htm
and scroll to Appendix 7.)

Rosenberg preferred death to being an informer (moser).  And he preferred to give the lasting gift of blame on our government even from the grave.

How has the Law of the Moser influenced the 9/11 investigation?

Stephen M. St. John          

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html to read online version of this letter to Mukasey which includes a link to Rosenberg letter to Bloch referenced above.

Update September 2013:  The link to the Julius Rosenberg letter above is corrupted and a replacement cannot be found.  However, excerpts from Julius Rosenberg's 5 June 1953 letter to his lawyer Emanuel Bloch appear on pages 207 - 213 of We Are Your Sons (by Robert & Michael Meeropol, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, 2nd Edition, 1986, Library of Congress call number HX84.R6M43).  Although the exact quotation found in the now-corrupted link does not appear in the Meeropols' book, their excerpts confirm its gist.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #26 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
24 September 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
What a rude and hostile reception I received today from the snarly FBI ladies when I called 212 384 1000!

I started to say I consider the 19 August 2008 death of Barry Jennings suspicious because the NIST "Final Report" on WTC 7, which was published the very next day, essentially erases Jennings' outstanding eyewitness testimony of explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11 by concluding there is no eyewitness testimony of explosions.

After four attempts, each lasting a few seconds before an abrupt hang up, I ceased my efforts to penetrate the FBI's 9/11 stone wall.

There are unconfirmed rumors that the then New York City Corporation Counsel Michael Hess, who accompanied Jennings to the EOC on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 and was stranded with him inside the building for about 90 minutes, has reversed his testimony that he, too, heard explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11.

If this is so, then Hess is just like Dr. Malcolm Perry, who three times described a neat round bullet entry hole the size of a pencil eraser in JFK's throat just above the tie knot at a press conference inside Parkland Hospital in Dallas at 3:16 PM on 22 November 1963.

Perry very soon discarded his own astute observation when he realized it did not fit the "three shots from behind" party line.

My calls to Hess (and/or his namesakes in the directory) have not been returned.

Thanks to the diligence of Jason Bermas, the testimonies of both Jennings and Hess are preserved in his documentary film Fabled Enemies and thereby continue to rebut the fraudulent instrument published by the National Institute of Standards & Technology on 20 August 2008.  Go to http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=fabled+enemies&hl=en&emb=0#
to view Fabled Enemies; the Jennings/Hess testimonies run from the 1:19:36 to 1:30:30 markers.

NIST's "Final Report" on WTC 7 has other serious flaws which I point out in my article Schlock & Awe on Top of Shock & Awe at http://www.show-the-house.com/id65.html.

NIST ignores seismic events during the WTC 7 collapse even though they appear elsewhere in NIST's documents, where yet other problems arise.

Stephen M. St. John

Hey, Big Guy!  Gimme a job.  Read my resume at:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html

Let me consult with you on your 9/11 investigation!

Update September 2013:  The link above to the documentary film Fabled Enemies is corrupted.  Please try http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28tE0fKpISM instead.

Update January 2014:  This particular letter makes a carelessly inaccurate claim that NIST ignored the seismic data.  Indeed NIST did consider the seismic record, albeit in a way that erroneously ruled out explosions as the cause.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #27 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
1 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
A few years ago President Bush famously ignored Ahmadinejad's letter, and just last week ordered our delegation to leave the UN General Assembly hall when the Iranian president spoke.  (See http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1024097.html.)

Only a praxis of evil cannot come half way to meet the conciliatory gestures of a putative opponent.  Such a praxis of evil seeks to perpetuate enmity by closing the door to peace through better understanding and mutual respect.

An ideology of world domination by full spectrum fraud and force is behind this conflict.

Secret evidence is behind the false alarms that keep Iran's file at the IAEA open.  As a judge, you can appreciate how the Iranians are amazed by the IAEA's handling of evidence which the Iranians are not allowed to examine directly.

These developments keep open the praxis of evil's false pretext to turn its constant threat of force into action.  Ahmadinejad has studied very well this praxis of evil.  As he noted in his speech, "These are the same powers that produce new generations of lethal nuclear arms and possess stockpiles of nuclear weapons that no international organization is monitoring; and, the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were perpetrated by one of them."

Clearly, the IAEA is not doing its job when it works for the USA rather than on the USA, whose revised war doctrine now permits preemptive nuclear attack even upon non-nuclear-armed countries.

Moreover, such insanity may very well have been turned against the American people on 9/11.  Again, here are the facts:  Felipe David's burn wounds sustained in a split second flash occurring seconds before the first jet impact on WTC 1 are exactly like those described at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.   Rick Siegel's video records sounds of explosions immediately before and during the collapses of the Twin Towers, and these sounds correlate perfectly with recorded seismic events.  And my olfactory sense, and those of my neighbors, recorded for weeks after 9/11 a distinctive smell like that of an electrical fire even though we were 7 miles windward from Ground Zero.

Stephen M. St. John

Hey, Big Guy!  Gimme a job.  Read my resume at
http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html
Let me consult with you on your 9/11 investigation!

Ground Zero is a military term denoting the site of a nuclear blast.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #28 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
3 October 2008

Our fearless leader, Mr. Attorney General, may no longer be a lame duck, but a dead duck, as the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street swindlers which he required of the US Congress only underscores the urgent need to redesign our financial system altogether.

Our warmongering plutocracy rides the waves of the Federal Reserve Bank as a private entitlement that can be a tsunami to others.  In defiance of our Constitution's mandate that Congress issue our money, the Fed starts us out as debtors.

We need the Fed like we need a hole in the head.  That's why JFK issued Executive Order #11110 on 4 June 1963.  It's still on the books and, along with corporate advertising right on our money, can be the basis for real change.

Mind over matter.  Mind over money.  Mind over deficit!

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is using the current financial crisis as a backdrop for his brazen call for new term limit laws so he can run again in 2009.  Bloomberg is a billionaire, which is admittedly cool, but one must understand that his wealth did not come from making and selling a new and improved widget.

Bloomberg is an alumnus of Salomon Brothers, a principal purveyor of the US public debt.  Bloomberg's wealth grew astronomically as the USA's public debt was foisted onto future generations.

More ominously, however, Bloomberg's international Zionist politics thrive on keeping raw the wound of 9/11 at Ground Zero as a rallying point for needless wars in the Middle East.  The World Trade Center Twin Towers could have been and should have been rebuilt by now!

Bloomberg's Zionist politics very likely explain his lack of zeal in presenting copious evidence of explosions inside the WTC to the 9/11 Commission, just as Philip Zelikow's Zionist proclivities effectively erased compelling testimonies of explosions by William Rodriguez, Barry Jennings and Lou Cacchioli, among others.

Giving such exculpatory evidence for Osama Bin Laden would have been a violation of the code of silence imposed by the Talmudic Law of the Moser.  Zionists will not transgress Bibi Netanyahu's edict that 9/11 benefitted Israel.

By deception they make war.        

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly.  This confounds justice!

Stephen M. St. John

Update September 2013:  Interestingly enough, Bloomberg's former employer Salomon Brothers was a major tenant in World Trade Center 7, which collapsed at free fall speed in the late afternoon of 11 September 2001 even though it had not been hit by a jet and had already been reported to have collapsed by the BBC twenty minutes before!

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #29 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
5 October 2008

Mr. Attorney General,
Today's Sunday Times quotes a British commander in Afghanistan, Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4882597.ece), as saying "We're not going to win this war" and "If the Taliban were prepared to sit on the other side of the table and talk about a political settlement, then that's precisely the sort of progress that concludes insurgencies like this."

This, of course, is a classic example of the hubris involved in waging the wrong war any way.  Exactly who invites whom to whose table is a conundrum best considered in light of the great profundity of Anglo American poet T. S. Eliot (CIA's James Jesus Angleton?):  "In my beginning is my end; in my end is my beginning."

The Taliban deserve a reprise with a UN International Independent Investigation Commission on 9/11.  Put that on the table, John Bull!

Didn't the Taliban offer to deliver Osama Bin Laden to the USA if evidence could be shown that Bin Laden was indeed behind 9/11?

Didn't President Bush, who says he saw on live TV the first jet hit on WTC 1, refuse the Taliban's quite reasonable offer?  How many died because of this obstinate refusal?

And what have you got, Mr. Attorney General, to bring to the Taliban seven years later?

You still cannot level with the American people, let alone the Taliban, about the disturbing lack of routine video surveillance evidence from the airports of 9/11.

You continue to uphold demonstrably bogus air and cell phone calls and attacking jets with trajectories of remote controlled missiles rather than pilots on their maiden voyages.

You still ignore and suppress copious eyewitness testimonies of explosions in the World Trade Center complex which are corroborated by audio, video, seismic and other scientific evidence.

You still refuse to consider abundant evidence of foreknowledge and prior intent to create "a new Pearl Harbor."

You keep the American people oblivious to the oil pipeline contract the Taliban made with the Argentine company Bridas.  (Karl Schwartz has pointed out a conflict of interest among many principals of the 9/11 Commission with respect to this pipeline.)

You cover for your Zionist buddies even as our presidential candidates fawn all over them!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, directly or indirectly.  This confounds justice!!!!

Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #30 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
9 October 2008 Yom Kippur

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I trust that you have had a good Kol Nidre ceremony last night, Yom Kippur Eve, and along with other congregants are buoyed by the release of your commitments as per the Jewish Encylopedia's rendering of the Aramaic into English:

"All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called 'onam,' 'onas,' or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."

Indeed, I do hope you understand how I wonder that perhaps this concept of Kol Nidre, which is not rooted in Torah, may put a kind of asterisk or exception on your oath or solemn affirmation of federal office, and that this might help to explain why much of the evidence that 9/11 was an inside job has been shunted aside, ignored and otherwise diminished.

Add to this the benefits that the Zionist state derived from the events of 9/11, and the conspiracy of silence engendered by the Talmudic Law of the Moser, and one can readily see how bogus cell phone calls, remote controlled aerial acrobatics, controlled demolitions and Lucky Larry Silverstein's 49 day miracle cash cow were all sold to the public through the controlled news media as an Arab attack on our freedoms.

Remember those years, months and weeks leading up to 9/11?  Remember how people were living their lives in the fast lane, exceeding the 55 per day limit on saying the word "terrorist"?

And that was in real life; what about the steady flow of crap out of Hollywood which amounts to psychological conditioning to the detriment of our Semitic brethren, the Arabs?

Americans were being primed unawares for the main event that took their blood, money and respect.

But maybe I will be the lucky one who will hear from you now that you have been released from your apparent vow not to answer.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html for An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem, a truly democratic and integrated state with one citizenship and one capital with equal opportunity for all.

Stephen M. St. John

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #31 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
13 October 2008 Happy & Blessed Succoth!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
In consideration of my constant reminders to you of the Jewish state's motive, means and opportunity to conduct a false flag intelligence operation on 9/11 and Bibi Netanyahu's emphatic claims that 9/11 was "good for Israel," let me go over the concept of expediency, a word whose adjectival form Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th edition) defines as "suitable for achieving a particular end in a given circumstance" and "usually implies what is immediately advantageous without regard for ethics or consistent principles."

Setting aside abundant circumstantial evidence that normally would place Zionists under scrutiny with respect to the events of 9/11, let me go back in history to the death of JFK for additional insight on this matter.

Mark Lane, whose efforts to discover the truth about the JFK assassination and to defend Lee Harvey Oswald posthumously are outstanding contributions to the nation, debated Joseph Ball, a lawyer on the staff of the Warren Commission, at Beverly Hills High School on 4 December 1964.

Also in attendance was the California ACLU leader Abraham L. Wirin, a friend of Chief Justice Warren, who addressed the audience and said, "I say thank God for Earl Warren.  He saved us from a pogrom.  He saved our nation.  God bless him for what he has done in establishing that Oswald was the lone assassin."

To which Lane replied, "If Oswald was innocent, Mr. Wirin, would you still say 'Thank God for Earl Warren' and bless him for establishing him as the lone murderer?"

To which Wirin responded, "Yes.  I still would say so."

Wirin spoke with perfect confidence that what he had just said would not appear in the news media, a noteworthy circumstance in itself.  But Mark Lane's tape recorder and commitment to history caught up with Wirin.  (See Mark Lane's 1991 book Plausible Denial, page 52)

It may also be that Wirin knew something that Lane didn't at that time (1964), and that history is also catching up to Mark Lane.  Seymour Hersh, in his 1991 book The Samson Option, in chapter 8, A Presidential Struggle, revealed that JFK was adamantly opposed to the Zionist state's nuclear weapons program, and that there was a bitterly intense behind the scenes struggle between JFK and David Ben Gurion, and that Ben Gurion resorted to outright lies about what was going on at the nuclear weapons installation at Dimona in the Negev desert.

Meyer Lansky, a friend of David Ben Gurion and an integral part of the CIA's Praxis of Evil, was well positioned to take care of the matter and get JFK off the Zionist state's nuclear file.  Interestingly in light of today's contrived controversy over Iran's nuclear file, the Shah of Iran toasted the news of JFK's death.

But if Americans had only known, these ruthless individuals certainly would have had reason to fear pogroms!  Instead, they bamboozled the Warren Commission staff into thinking they were saving the USA from a nuclear war with the Soviet Union.  By comparison, "Dallas" was a sitcom and J. R. a cream puff!

Also fearing pogroms were Jack Ruby, who assassinated Oswald to prevent discovery according to the requirements of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, and his sidekick, George H. W. Bush, whose joint efforts to establish Oswald's false and misleading public persona as a pro-Castro agitator are described in my letter to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist which you can read at http://www.show-the-house.com/id6.html.

1991 witnessed not only the publications of Lane's Plausible Denial and Hersh's Samson Option, but the more widely observed release of Oliver Stone's movie JFK.  Together, these three masterpieces represent three quarks tending toward a unified whole, with two of them not so subtly suggesting the CIA was entirely to blame for the JFK assassination, and the third passively providing grounds on which one may infer a Zionist motive dominating all the other motives to kill JFK.  We certainly cannot ignore the end result; namely, the end of JFK's "two way street" diplomacy conducive to a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.

Lane said years ago that he wrote his last book on the JFK assassination, so we can safely assume he will not tread the path leading to Lansky and the Zionist connection as set forth by Michael Collins Piper in his 1993 book Final Judgment.

Lane's decision appears to be in keeping with the conspiracy of silence enjoined by the Talmudic Law of Moser, whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing directly or indirectly on another Jew to a non-Jew under penalty of shunning, despoliation and even elimination.  Moreover, the recent revelations of convicted spy Morton Sobell serve to remind Jews of the strong efficacy of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prevented the Rosenbergs from informing on others in their spy ring when doing so would have been strong grounds for life-saving clemency.

So how do the dynamics of expediency and a Talmudic conspiracy of silence among Jews affect our considerations of 9/11?  Last week I saw Mayor Bloomberg and he had a worried look on his face.  I don't think the financial crisis was foremost in his mind, for Bloomberg well knows how he helped downplay evidence before the 9/11 Commission of explosions inside the World Trade Center complex, which makes him and his minions at the very least accessories after the fact.

Will a third term as mayor secure Bloomberg's fate?  The Internet has changed the game since the time of JFK.  Now, even Barry Jennings speaks from the grave about explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11.  Just google "Fabled Enemies" and hear him!

For more on the Talmudic Law of the Moser visit:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.

Stephen M. St. John

Update September 2013:  According to the Associated Press, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in an interview with PBS journalist Charlie Rose on 11 January 2013 in Dallas, Texas, told him that his father, Attorney General of the USA Robert F. Kennedy, did not believe the Warren Commission's "lone gunman" theory and found that phone records of Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby were like an inventory of Mafia leaders whom the Kennedy Administration had been investigating prior to the assassination of his brother JFK.  Both Rose and Kennedy have yet to learn that, according to Lucky Luciano, Meyer Lansky was the effective head of the Cosa Nostra as of 1961 and was, as stated above in this letter #31 to Attorney General Mukasey, well placed to get JFK off the Zionist state's nuclear file.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #32 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
16 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Lest you think I am just another nerd with a monomania about 9/11, let me tell you I am well rounded with other interests touching our national interest.

My Hewlett Packard printer is available to make money if Bill Gates can get a franchise for distribution of the Treasury's specialized printer paper.  Just as Harry Truman gave us a chicken in every pot, and Clinton gave us pot in every chicken, I stand ready to pioneer a mint in every patriot's printer!

Also, I have a keen interest in developing the first casino bank, where the M3 money supply, on which our government stopped reporting back on 23 March 2006, is the elusive object of wagers and the house loses often enough to preserve plausibility.

I also like a good laugh and blowing bubbles.

All seriousness aside, and getting back to 9/11 and the resultant upheavals in the Middle East, Her Tzippiness really ought to hold back on attacking Iran.

Let's do a really odious comparison.  How many Jews has Ahmadinejad killed?   How many Jews has the Livni family killed?

Ahmadinejad has never killed a Jew and will do so only in self defense.  Tzippi Livni's father killed nearly a dozen Jews when he blew up British Headquarters inside the King David Hotel during a long terrorist campaign that culminated in the creation of the Zionist state.

As she prepares to take over as the next FM, do we really have to put up with the hypocritical refusal of Zionist terrorists to negotiate with "terrorists"?

Other examples of Jews killing Jews abound, but I will spare you by not enumerating them.  However, I will stress, as I did in my previous letter, the Talmud's wide latitude for expedient measures and strict code of silence to preserve, protect and defend them.

I've heard rumors that Livni's boss, Menachem Begin, phoned a warning to the King David Hotel, but it was in Biblical Hebrew and beyond the comprehension of the Limey who took the call.

On the other hand, we have proof positive that two employees of the Israeli messaging company Odigo received warnings about the impending 9/11 attacks two hours before they took place.

May I see your Odigo 9/11 file?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html to read Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey.

Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #33 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
23 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let us please turn to the all-important seismic evidence of the events of 9/11.  As previously stated, Richard A. Siegel's video and soundtrack record explosions seconds before and during the collapse of each of the Twin Towers.  Siegel's soundtrack can be calibrated to the 10 AM top-of-the-hour tone broadcast by 1010 WINS radio station playing in the background, and correlates perfectly with off-the-chart spikes on Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory seismograph in the Palisades of New Jersey.  Siegel's film and the seismic record together constitute best evidence of controlled demolitions of the Twin Towers. (See http://www.911raw.com.)

So why is Siegel's film not a factor in analysis of the seismic record?  Why has this best evidence been excluded from the discovery process in law enforcement and judicial proceedings?  And why does the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ignore such dispositive evidence?  Even the 9/11 truth movement steers around Siegel's film and its implications, which is quite an interesting phenomenon in and of itself.  (Use of aluminum powder incendiaries to take down the Twin Towers has been proven quite conclusively by Steven Jones, a leading 9/11 truth figure, but such explosives do not result in off-the-chart spikes on the seismic record.  Thermate and Thermite were used in conjunction with much more powerful explosives set within the central core columns and at the base of each tower.  These high powered explosions give us a much narrower range of specialized suspects compared with practitioners of aluminum powder incendiaries.)

As demonstrated in my "Shlock & Awe on top of Shock & Awe" article, NIST leaves out of its report two blast events, each 0.6 on the Richter Scale, occurring 8 seconds apart precisely when WTC 7 was demolished.  NIST's shocking omission came even though such evidence of WTC 7 blast events is included elsewhere in NIST's literature on 9/11.  (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id65.html.)

NIST and the seismologists simply do not consider copious eyewitness, audio and video evidence of explosions at WTC 1, 2 and 7, and make the superficially plausible inference that the building collapses caused the spikes on the seismic record.  See Appendix B of NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1-9_vol2_for_public_comment.pdf.

Likewise do they blindly infer that the two jet impacts registered on the seismograph; Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross of Scholars for 9/11 Truth argue quite persuasively that explosions were synchronized with the jet impacts, but the evildoers were off on their timing by a few seconds.  Hence the many reports, albeit suppressed by the media, of two loud bangs at WTC 1 in the opening round of our unjustified invasions and occupations in the Middle East.  Science followed the news media to effect a high tech lynching of Muslims.  See:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/ExplosionInTowerBeforeJetHitByFurlongAndRoss.pdf.

Once the evidence is admitted and not excluded, and the truth sets us free, we are ready to ask, how could Osama Bin Laden get his men inside Lucky Larry Silverstein's well guarded properties to plant the explosives?  Could 9/11 have happened another way?  Have you considered mobbed up unions?

But seismic data published by NIST presents even more problems insofar that the period from 8:30 AM to 10:00 AM is simply omitted in the graphic presentations of the 9/11 seismograph.  During this 90 minute interval the impacts of the two aerial vehicles and the collapse of WTC 2 occurred.  NIST's graphs inexplicably show seismic evidence only from 10:00 AM to 5:30 PM.

So what is NIST hiding?  We see in its graphs the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 7 and a few quarry blasts in between during the 7 ½ hour interval commencing 10 AM EDT.  WTC 7 looks like two quarry blasts 8 seconds apart. (Did WTC 7 bounce and fall again?)  And strangely coincidentally, the WTC 1 collapse is lined up with an earthquake in Indonesia at 6.5 on the Richter Scale.  (The seismograph traces 30 minute intervals, so the WTC 1 collapse at 10:28:34 is right on top of the Indonesian earthquake at 10:56:51.)  You'd think at a glance that the 6.5 quake, by jutting off the chart into the other parallel 30 minute trace intervals above and below, simply occults the beginning of the WTC 1 collapse. (See this graph reproduced at:

http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html.

UPDATE June 2017 Better yet, go to http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861611
and scroll down to page 662 [728 of 797 PDF].)

But wait!  On the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO) seismograph there is another off-the-chart spike just like the 6.5 Indonesian quake, but it's at the very beginning of the WTC 2 collapse at 9:59, which is not shown on the NIST graph, where it would line up with both the WTC 1 collapse and Indonesian quake.

LDEO (http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html) shows a different pattern of 30 minute trace intervals, from 10 minutes and 40 minutes after each hour, which enables the reader to see clearly that the two off-the-chart spikes coincide with the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2.  The Indonesian quake is a joker nearly perfectly timed to overlay the Twin Tower explosions on seismographs with 30 minute traces starting each hour and half hour.

And if you compare the Indonesian quake with one at Fox Islands (17:10:55) at 5.1 on the Richter Scale, you will begin to fathom the dimensions of our problem.  The Fox Islands quake doesn't show any spike at all!  And we know from sources as diverse as the late Internet investigative journalist Joe Vialls (http://www.vialls.com) and former Senator and US Secretary of Defense William Cohen that the USA can cook up an earthquake almost as easily as it can start an invasion!  (See:

http://www.fas.org/news/usa/1997/04/bmd970429d.htm)

"...sabotage and subversion are inherently insecure -- the authors of bangs are liable to detection."  Soviet spy Kim Philby  (My Secret War, page 5)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #34 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
26 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me direct your attention this time to the salient issue of alleged 9/11 hijackers turning up alive according to European and Middle Eastern news media reports.

They are:  Walid M. Ash Shehri, Wail M. Ash Shehri, and Abdul Aziz Al Omari from AA Flight 11; Mohand Ash Shehri from UA Flight 175; Salem Al Hazmi from AA Flight 77; and Said Al Ghamdi and Ahmed An Nami from UA Flight 93.

(See http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html and
http://www.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
or google "9/11 hijackers still alive")

You and I both know how the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which from time to time exercises our exorbitantly expensive right of free speech with full page ads in major American newspapers, could easily settle the question of the identities of the above named alleged hijackers.  Doing so, you would think, would be in the kingdom's best interests.  So far I cannot confirm rumors that the Saudi Embassy in Washington verified that the seven Saudis named above are indeed still alive.

Likewise, the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and the Arab American Institute (among others) are passive on this subject too, perhaps wisely so because of the chain of violence in our land.  Your Bolshevik distant cousin Stalin could not have done a better job of enforcing such a conspiracy of silence.  (I'm just dying to carry a Homeland Badge for a Homeland Salary!)

So, even though we have no credible airport video surveillance evidence of any of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- and no names of alleged hijackers on the airlines' flight manifests, and only bogus cell phone calls and planted evidence (including a will inside delayed luggage which nobody could have read had there been no delay [duhhh!]), Americans still fail to see what many around the world clearly see:  9/11 was a false flag intelligence operation allowing the conquering to conquer.

"By deception make war"
Motto of the Mossad

"Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me!"
Proverb that George W. Bush botched.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #35 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
29 October 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me now turn your attention again to the flights of 9/11.

As reported on 8 March 2002 by the Portugal News, an English language weekly published in Portugal, Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (USA, retired), an old Pentagon hand and foremost arms dealer worldwide, convened a private symposium of military, commercial and civilian aviation professionals from 16 through 19 September 2001.  The unanimous conclusion of this group, which was reported to the highest levels in the Pentagon, was that the news media's story was false and the flights of 9/11 were remote controlled in a highly sophisticated intelligence operation. See http://www.infowars.com/transcripts/degranpres.htm
or read transcript of Alex Jones's interview with de Grand-Pré here:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id70.html.

Other aviation professionals have come forward since de Grand-Pré's groundbreaking effort to express disbelief of the official story and demand a new investigation.  Alan Miller has assembled the statements of 120 aviation professionals, most with vast military and commercial flight experience, who question the official story of 9/11.  See http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html.

Also, pilot Robert Balsamo has assembled a group of experienced military and commercial pilots and other aviation professionals called Pilots for 911 Truth (http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/).  They found that the Flight Data Recorder for AA Flight 77, provided by the National Transportation Safety Board, shows the craft more than 200 feet higher in the air on final approach at the Pentagon than is stated by the 9/11 Commission, which invalidates the government's conclusions about what happened at the Pentagon.

They also dispel disinformation by highlighting a 1964 white paper by WTC designer John Skilling in which he maintains that a Boeing 707 jet colliding into either of the planned WTC Twin Towers at 600 miles per hour "would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact."

They compel me to call for a new investigation.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html

Update February 2014:  You can also read the transcript of Alex Jones's interview with the late Donn de Grand-Pré on my website at:
http://www.show-the-house.com/id70.html.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #36 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
31 October 2008   Harpy Halloween!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
It's a pity that Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (first through 11th editions) does not list the Hebrew words "moser" (informer, rat, fink, rat-fink) and "sayan" (assistant, Mossad assistant) just as it incorporates other foreign loan words.  For without these words Americans cannot grasp how their national sovereignty has been usurped by a praxis of evil.  With these words, American history can be rewritten as a redemptive story stranger than fiction.

You know I have made frequent reference to the word "moser" in previous letters to you.  I will soon revise my webpage "The Talmudic Law of the Moser" with examples from recent history of how this law engenders an unhealthy conspiracy of silence.  (http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.)

I have yet to touch the word "sayan" and will do so now.  I will refer you to a webpage of Christopher Bollyn, a pioneering 9/11 truthseeker whose logical and intuitive mind has led to original discoveries and penetrating analyses which should guide any real investigation.

Briefly, Bollyn names Michael S. Goff as a likely Mossad helper (a sayan not directly on the Mossad payroll) at an obscure software company in Massachussetts named Ptech.  (See http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10761.)

Bollyn maintains that "Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency, infiltrated the most sensitive computer networks in the United States through a little start-up company known as Ptech.... it was this infiltration that allowed the events of September 11, 2001 to occur."  With reference to our suspected sayan, he adds, "Under Goff, Ptech software loaded with trapdoors and Trojan Horses was sold and loaded onto the MOST sensitive computer systems that failed miserably, or performed well (depending on your view), on September 11, 2001."  These computer systems included those of the Federal Aviation Administration and US Air Force among other clients of this mysterious IT consultancy Ptech.

Their radar systems were gamed.  "9/11 was good for Israel" says Netanyahu!

I love Jews.  They are sinfully delicious and high in protein too.  If their high saturated fat content doesn't make you feel guilty, then flossing certainly will, because you will never hear the end of their complaint that you're picking on them!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  I highly recommend Christopher Bollyn's book, Solving 9-11:  The Deception That Changed the World, which can be downloaded as a PDF file from his website at:
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Solving_9-11_-_The_Deception_That_Changed_The_World.pdf.

To readers taking offense at my joke, I offer my apologies.  Having never had a response from Mukasey for so very long a time, my humor - albeit a sardonic kind of humor - escaped me in the Halloween spirit.  To those mean-spirited enough to take this joke out of bounds, let me assure them:  I eschew cannibals and the practice of cannibalism in all its forms.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #37 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
5 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Now that was one heck of a repudiation of Republican policies last night, and President-elect Obama will hopefully find himself free to go into an area studiously avoided by the candidates and the news media; namely; a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.

Knowing how our military misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates on 9/11, where there is no credible video surveillance evidence, is a prerequisite for knowing how to end them.

With respect to 9/11, the resultant invasions and occupations, and Barack Obama's mandate to bring change, I repeat the words of JFK which clearly and incisively express a chronic problem that still needs to be solved:

"... We are opposed, around the world, by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration instead of invasion; on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice; on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.  It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.  Its preparations are concealed not published.  Its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not praised; no expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.  It conducts the cold war, in short, with a wartime discipline no democracy would ever hope to wish to match. ..."

Was JFK talking about the same organization that decades later stole PROMIS software and used Ptech to load it on government computers including those of the Federal Aviation Administration and US Air Force?

Was this the same organization that infiltrated our radar system and caused confusion right in the middle of USAF exercises on the morning of 9/11?

Did JFK know that Bolshevism was a US export from the Lower East Side of New York City to Russia?

That Zionist Khazar "Jews" comprised the core of Communism?

Listen to Benjamin Freedman's speech!

Listen to and read Benjamin Freedman's speech:  http://www.benjaminfreedman.net/2007/03/transcript-of-freedmans-speech.html.

Americans can no longer afford to ignore Freedman's warnings!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  The link above to Benjamin Freedman's famous 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel in Washington DC is corrupted.  Please try instead http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm for the transcript and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48c for audio version.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #38 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
6 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Now let me turn your attention to the anthrax attacks right after 9/11 and the farcical FBI investigation that followed in a veering three stage pattern.

First, an anonymously accused Arab-American scientist at Fort Detrick was properly cleared of wrongdoing by the FBI.  The cowardly accuser was stupid enough to reveal foreknowledge of the anthrax attacks.  Two reporters from the Hartford Courant newspaper then put former Fort Detrick scientist Philip M. Zack in the spotlight as a person known to have harassed mercilessly the same falsely accused Arab-American scientist years before.

Zack was sacked for his egregiously bad behavior, but it can be proved he subsequently had unauthorized access to anthrax at Fort Detrick.  Zack's access to anthrax and his anti-Arab animus jibe well with the Bush Administration's primitive attempt to blame Iraq for the anthrax attacks even though the White House was well aware the anthrax spores were weapons grade and could only have come from Fort Detrick.

Have you looked at Zack?

These indications flagging Zack resulted in a two pronged attack on another former Fort Detrick scientist, Steven J. Hatfill; first by the New York Times and then by the FBI, who, after leaking information, conducted a campaign of harassment that ultimately resulted, after your tenure as Attorney General began, in a multi-million dollar judgment for Hatfill.  Judge Walton said there was "not a scintilla of evidence" against Hatfill.

How could the FBI and the newsmedia be so wrong?

After all this rigmarole, along came Bruce E. Ivins, yet another scientist at Fort Detrick whom the FBI harassed mercilessly.  Instead of effecting a money judgment for Ivins, the FBI literally drove him to commit suicide and then confidently announced he was the post 9/11 anthrax man.  Ivins' lawyers strongly reject the FBI's conclusion, yet the newsmedia eagerly gobbled it up.

I certainly hope you see the need to establish and maintain credibility at the DoJ.

Who had personal information about Ivins sufficient to set him up at the Princeton mailbox where anthrax was mailed?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew, and is poison for good government.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #39 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
12 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Americans who are stupid and stubborn enough to keep believing impossible stories such as cell phone calls from the allegedly hijacked jets of 9/11 invite an encore by our homegrown praxis of evil.

This seems to be the case with the head-on crash of a Metrolink commuter train and Union Pacific freight train near Chatsworth, California, on 12 September 2008.

From the very outset the press reports did not ring true.

Briefly, if the official story were true, then the commuter train, after having failed to stop at a red light, should have derailed at the switch which was set for the oncoming freight train to pass.  This did not happen.

Moreover, if National Transportation Safety Board member Kathryn Higgins's preposterous claim that the commuter train just "blew through the switch" were true, then the jolting effect felt at the switch would have been quite sufficient to alert the engineer to stop the train and also would have been reported by survivors of the crash.  And the switch itself should have been damaged by this bizarrely hypothesized "blew through" transit.  But none of this happened.

So the question naturally arises, Did the engineer see a green light on the ground when the dispatcher saw a red one on his console?  How could this be?

The unlearned lessons of 9/11 will one day clarify how computer software programs such as PROMIS and PTECH can surreptitiously override whole computer systems of our national infrastructure to monitor and even sabotage them.  Infiltration of our national command, control and communications system on 9/11, particularly our radar and security operations, served a political agenda.

But the Chatsworth crash, which happened at the very moment our financial system became totally unhinged from the real economy, served financial interests with a totalitarian temperament requiring total control.

The railroad's tried and true procedures had kept risk of catastrophic human error infinitesimally small.  Then this mysterious crash greased the skids for an expensive upgrade, an automated "fail safe" signal system to replace one that works just fine.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
Website:  http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #40 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
17 November 2008

Did you ever wonder, Mr. Attorney General, how the mainstream news media can continue to ignore Richard A. Siegel's film (http://www.911raw.com/) capturing the collapses of the Twin Towers, which corresponds perfectly with off-the-chart seismic spikes seconds before each collapse?

Here are the characteristics of a controlled demolition, all of which were present at the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001:

Sounds of explosions heard and felt far and near; sounds of explosions recorded by Richard A. Siegel; off the chart blast events recorded by the Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; sudden onset of collapse; flashes seen and recorded inside the buildings; squibs seen and recorded popping out of windows; mid-air pulverization of concrete and steel into superfine powder; pyroclastic dust clouds crossing over land and water; symmetrical collapse; free fall speed of collapse with no resistance from below until ground level; blast waves; lateral ejection of very heavy steel beams as far as 600 feet; total destruction of the buildings; molten steel lingering in sub-basement levels for up to seven weeks; evidence of military grade thermate in dust samples collected by residents living near ground zero; evidence of diagonally placed thermate cutting charges on vertical support beams; evidence of foreknowledge of the collapses among key officials in government and media among others, including Mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani and BBC reporter Jane Standley; many bodies unaccounted for; thousands of tiny human bone fragments discovered on rooftops of buildings adjacent to the World Trade Center as well as in nearby drains and gutters.

Copious evidence shows that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand multiple collisions of big jetliners.  Even in the most fanciful hypothesis of mechanical collapse due to the effects of structural damage and fire, the collapse should have been asymmetrical; i.e., the building should have tilted toward the jet's point of impact -- the weakened side of the building -- and then should have fallen in that direction.  Instead we saw a sudden, uniform drop straight down with no resistance from below.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
Website:  http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #41 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
19 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
As the Bush Administration draws to a close, let me recommend to you and all others at the Department of Justice, including your successors there, a truly magnificent Italian film called Zero:  An Investigation into 9/11.

You can view the English version by clicking this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

or, better yet, going here:
http://zerofilm.it to buy the CD.

One of the presenters is Dario Fo, a Nobel Prize winner, whose great élan epitomizes the spirit of the filmmakers.  With admirable discipline and ingenuity, the makers of this masterpiece explain succinctly why the 9/11 Commission Report is so very inadequate.  Allow 105 minutes to see this film.

The testimonies of key eyewitnesses, expert witnesses and analysts are paraded before your eyes in such a way that you might want to put these creative artists on the DoJ payroll.  They are not perfect in that they avoid salient issues like seismic data and Ptech software loading PROMIS software into government computer systems to monitor and game them, and a few other issues, but believe me, this is a compelling and classic performance!

Speculation on who sits at your desk come 20 January 2009 hinges on speculation on who will sit in the Oval Office.

President Elect Obama and the Democratic National Committee are compelled to answer by 1 December 2008 Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg's petition for a Writ of Certiorari on his unsuccessful District Court challenge of Obama's qualifications.  (Correction:  There is no compulsion to answer; rather, the parties were served notice of Berg's petition and have the option to respond, and if they do, only then must they answer by the date set by the court.)

The issue of Berg's standing to make such challenge ought not consume the little time left before the Electoral College selects our next president on 15 December 2008, so I have requested that Chief Justice Roberts determine the facts and law in this matter on an urgent basis, and then advise the Electoral College forthwith.

(See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html.)

The controlling law for this controversy is found in Article II, Section 1, Amendment XII and Section 3 of Amendment XX of the Constitution of the USA.

Briefly, if Obama's paternal grandmother's claim that she witnessed his birth in Kenya in 1961 is true, Obama is not eligible to be President of the USA.

And if he ever held Indonesian citizenship, he is not even a naturalized US citizen.  Bingo!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
Website:  http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  After years of consideration of various claims, I have finally concluded that Barack Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA simply because his father was a temporary resident alien from Kenya who returned there when his visa expired.  Therefore, according to Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, Barack Obama was never eligible to the Office of President of the USA regardless of his place of birth.  Blame for this illegality falls on Barack Obama's former colleagues in the United States Senate who were collectively remiss in their duty under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution of the United States, which holds that "Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members."  Moreover, Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigators in Maricopa County, Arizona, have proved beyond any reasonable doubt fraud in the April 2011 posting of Obama's purported birth certificate on the White House website.  Their good work in the public interest will ultimately triumph over the media blackout and distortions imposed on them.  The fear-mongering, war-mongering Zionist Neoconservative Wall Street interests have skillfully used this eligibility issue as a kill-switch to assure Barack Obama's seamless continuity of the Bush Administration's quest for world domination by full spectrum fraud and force.

Update July 2018:  View Zero at https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/zero-an-investigation-into-911/; the links given above no longer work!

Text of fax broadcast:                                                                                   
Open Letter #42 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
20 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Few remember or were even aware of the 6 May 1981 crash of a US Air Force EC-135N under highly unusual circumstances that logically indicate sabotage by remote control.  When EgyptAir 990 went down in a mysterious nose-dive on 31 October 1999, and soon thereafter the press fed us an aerodynamically impossible roller coaster-like scenario before the jet's final plunge into the deep Atlantic, I put two and two together and came to the conclusion that both events were acts of sabotage in the interests of the Zionist state.  My reasons for saying this are expressed on my website at http://www.show-the-house.com/id9.html, which includes a link to USAF General Robert Chapman's "Accident" Investigation Report on the crash of the EC-135N.

Now, having viewed the film Zero http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ, and having considered the testimonies of Russ Wittenberg, a military and commercial pilot for over 30 years, and Robert Hordon, an Air Traffic Controller at Boston Center for 11 years, who conclude that the aerial vehicle that hit the Pentagon could not possibly have been flown by flight students on their maiden voyage, and remembering my colleague's description of the highly unusual attitude of the jet that hit WTC2 as it made its approach over New York harbor, as pointed out in letter #04 of 30 June 2008 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html), I cannot help but conclude that these aircraft were flown by remote control.

And bearing in mind how these attacks on New York and Washington fulfilled psychopathic Zionist Neoconservative desires to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, and how motive, means and opportunity to pull off a sophisticated false flag intelligence operation center on Dov Zakheim and his ilk, I regard the EC-135N and EgyptAir 990 crashes as precursors to what happened on 9/11.

These events illuminate each other if you look.

I hope history will show who looked into these matters and who didn't.

Our ghost riders in the sky will have separated seekers of truth and justice from accessories before and after the fact of 9/11.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
Website:  http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #43 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
23 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Did psychosomatic stress from upholding the manifold lies of the 9/11 Commission and anthrax investigation overcome you Thursday night?

The AP reported that former Solicitor General Theodore Olson escorted your wife Susan when the EMS took you to the hospital.  You will recall it was his wife Barbara's alleged call from AA Flight 77 which buttressed the story of Arab hijackers and our inexorable progress into Afghanistan and Iraq.

But as I demonstrated in my letter #03 of 26 June 2008 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html), Barbara's ballyhooed call simply did not connect according to a DoJ exhibit presented at the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui.

(See http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html.)

Ted Olson appears to be less than forthright on this important matter and has never been held to account.  Seeing him with your wife after you fell makes me wonder if there is a closeness that prevents objectivity on your part.  Have you thought of waterboarding this Viking?  Was he duped?

Knowing what really happened on 9/11 is to know how we were sent to Afghanistan and Iraq, and knowing how we arrived there is prerequisite to knowing how to leave.

Having a passive AG will only make the situation worse.  Barring Barack Obama's failure to qualify to be President of the USA (if he was born in Kenya or if he later held Indonesian citizenship), there is every indication things will not get better.

The Bomb Belgrade Crew is about to replace the Bomb Baghdad Crew.  Our Zionist Buddies will have made their "clean break" and secured "their Realm" while Americans remain stuck with the Mena Arkansas Drug Cartel.

The superlative documentary film Zero(See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ)
shows the Mena Cartel allied with Al Qa'ida in Bosnia a few years after the UN Charter became a joke on Yugoslavia in 111 parts.

Hitler's dream of hegemony of the Mark from the Baltic to the Adriatic, albeit in the form of the Euro, disrupted foreign exchange operations, which spurred creation of structured finances such as derivatives.

Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo and "smaller footprints in Iraq" are but emblems of plunder.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html

Update September 2013:  By the time of Barack Obama's 4 June 2009 speech in Cairo, Egypt, it was clear that he would not challenge the 9/11 Commission Report.  Again, the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility for the office of President of the United States hinges on the "natural born Citizen" test which he does not meet regardless of his place of birth because his father was a temporary resident alien in the USA who returned to his native Kenya when his visa expired. Q.E.D.  Also, the USA's alliance with Al Qa'ida in Bosnia during the Clinton Administration was a precursor to its current alliance with Al Qa'ida in Libya and Syria and the illegal flow of arms from the former to the latter.

Update July 2018:  View Zero at https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/zero-an-investigation-into-911/; the link above no longer works!

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #44 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
25 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I hope by now you are fully recovered from last Thursday night's episode of the black vapors.

Barack Obama is fast assembling a Zionist's "Dream Team" Administration, and Eric Holder as Attorney General will assure the same steadfast inattention to the many loose ends of the 9/11 Commission Report and anthrax investigation.

My fax broadcast of 03 February 2008 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html) reported on a British investigation that traces the access needed to plant explosives in the WTC to KPMG in Zug, Switzerland, the home of Marc Rich, for whom Holder bent the rules of the pardon process.

Who pressed Holder's buttons?

On the other hand, the case being advanced by Philip J. Berg -- that President Elect Barack Obama is not qualified to be President of the USA -- grows stronger by the day.  He has already produced a recording of Obama's paternal grandmother affirming to a Swahili translator that she attended and observed the birth of our President Elect on 4 August 1961 in Kenya.  He has shown that under existing law Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA, and therefore is not eligible to be President of the USA.

Berg has also shown documents proving that Obama, known then as Barry Soetoro, was enrolled in a grammar school in Jakarta as an Indonesian citizen, in which case, under existing law, he is not even a naturalized citizen of the USA and therefore not eligible to hold any federal office.

Yesterday, Berg posted a video giving expert testimony that Obama's Certificate of Live Birth (not a Birth Certificate) posted on the Internet is a forgery.  You may view this video at http://www.obamacrimes.com/.

Obama's tactic is to ignore Berg, and the news media is complicit.

But for how long?

If another individual qualifies as President, and Berg is Attorney General, a real 9/11 investigation will bypass the CIA's "limited hangout" that will pin mobbed up union members for placing military grade thermate charges in WTC 1, 2 & 7.

Thermate does not explain the off the chart spikes on the seismic record, which correspond perfectly with Richard A. Siegel's video.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html

Update September 2013:  Although I do not agree with many of their conclusions, the forensic economists of Hawks Café do provide interesting and important information including links to Zug, Switzerland, as shown in their 9/11 Resolution Trilogy of documentary films at http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL071B4A58D38DD384.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #45 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
30 November 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
As sure as the heavens above are blue and the good earth below is green, cell phone calls as of 11 September 2001 could not possibly have been made from flying jets, nor were seat back air phones available on Boeing 757 jets.

So all those stories about cell phone calls and air phone calls on 9/11 are simply bogus.  Continued denial of this hard fact raises moral questions, and the Moussaoui trial stipulation that such calls did take place raises questions of credibility and incompetence at the U. S. Department of Justice.

You can read this stipulation at:

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/ST00001A.pdf.

Once you get past the denial, analysis of the alleged calls will be helpful in a new investigation of 9/11.  The verve and alacrity of the press to fill the void of reality required a combination of imagination and cunning or, in the likely case of telephone and radio impersonations by real time digital voice morphing technology, gullibility.  (As an example of voice morphing, you could call your wife and sound like Daffy Duck, or she could call you and sound like Congressman Charles Rangel.)

As a former part time Field Representative with the U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, I worked with New York Assistant Regional Director Marion Britton for 11 years.  I detect a very unlikely story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette saying, "She called longtime friend Fred Fiumano, from whom she had borrowed a cell phone."  Marion had a Census Bureau-issued cell phone with her at all times, and if she had trouble with her phone, she could have very easily replaced it when she was in the office on 10 September.

And if she did try to call from UA Flight 93, her first call would have been to the New York office.  Marion knew, followed and taught the drill.  So this tall tale lacks plausibility.  (See http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010922gtenat4p4.asp.)

Whoever impersonated Marion in a call to Mr. Fiumano no doubt knew the New York office would have been -- or had already been -- evacuated.  I was the last one out at about 9:10 AM.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John

Is President Elect Barack Obama deceiving the world about his qualifications to be President of the USA?  Will the College of Electors learn the relevant facts and applicable law before they select the next President of the USA on 15 December 2008?  See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html!

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #46 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
2 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Yesterday's statement by the Iranian Foreign Ministry that human rights advocates are now determined to collect 75 million signatures nationwide to protest the sanctions placed on Iran's aviation industry makes me think the unresolved 9/11 aviation issues constitute a human rights problem too.

These attacks on 9/11 appear to have been a false flag intelligence operation to justify invasions in the Middle East, and the resultant scale of human suffering is staggering.  Truth and justice with respect to 9/11 are therefore human rights issues.

The USA's sanctions on Iran are an expression of Zionist driven hostility toward the Iranian nation.

Moreover, sabotage of Iranian military flights in recent years recalls the mysterious crashes of a USAF EC-135N and EgyptAir Flight 990, where likely sabotage by remote control just happened to serve the Zionist agenda.  These precursors to the remote controlled flights of 9/11 establish a pattern leading to events that, as Bibi Netanyahu would say, are "good for Israel."  I have explained this in more detail in previous letters and at http://www.show-the-house.com/id9.html.

New high tech weaponry, including sabotage by remote control or other electromagnetic interference, and telephone and radio impersonation by real time digital voice morphing, leaves little or no trace of the clever but cowardly criminals who use them.  The new challenge of this young century will be prevention and the ultimate rooting out of these insane and inhumane technologies.

Add to this list sanctions that compromise the safety of the flying public.  These too are insane and inhumane.  So insane and inhumane as to amount to terrorism.  It is a form of war imposed by those who seek to dominate the world against any legal, moral and spiritual consideration.

This praxis of evil has not shown routine video surveillance images of any of the passengers at the airports of 9/11, has claimed these passengers made cell phone calls that are technically impossible to make, and has not shown one piece of jet debris bearing an identification number.

Totally insane!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  To clarify, the surveillance video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of alleged hijackers in the Main Terminal on the morning of 11 September 2001.  There is absolutely no 9/11 surveillance video evidence from Newark Liberty International Airport and Boston Logan International Airport.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #47 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
5 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Watching Pakistanis watch our Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen flail with his arms and hands like a conductor of the Boston Symphony Orchestra as he tells them what their next steps are in sorting out the Mumbai attacks only serves to highlight the rank hypocrisy of the USA in its very suspicious approach to the investigation of 9/11.

India was quick to show photos and videos of the Mumbai terrorists.

An Indian news photographer actually latched onto one murderous pair at the railway station and followed them about as he snapped picture after picture of their carnage from as close as 30 feet away.  Talk about symbiotic relationships!  They were feeding off each other!

The prolonged siege by 10 men in a major city against police and military forces is way beyond my understanding, but nevertheless the prompt, graphic reporting stands in stark contrast to the 9/11 investigation.  This is the lesson to be learned.

Think of it!  Seven full years after 9/11 we have yet to see ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three "Category X" high security airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed.

Nor have we had any explanation as to why we have not seen evidence of passengers or hijackers at these airports in the form of routine video surveillance tapes.

We repeatedly saw on TV two suspects at Portland, Maine airport.

So when I hear Rice and Mullen preach the necessity of a "transparent investigation" of the Mumbai attacks to the Pakistanis, I find myself halfway between laughing or crying.  That the unjustified, immoral, illegal and ill-advised invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11 is not lost on the Pakistanis or the greater global community.

Yet Mullen and Rice seem clueless about the lies, distortions, inconsistencies and omissions in the official account of 9/11.

If they don't know how they actually came to occupy this part of the world, they certainly will not know how to leave.

Let the USA practice what it preaches.  Let's conduct a real investigation of 9/11!

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #48 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
8 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
While I lament the sorry state of our "mainstream newsmedia" others no doubt are quite content with the workings of our "free press."

Investigative journalism did nothing to resolve doubts about Barack Obama's qualifications to be President of the USA which were first raised well before the Democratic Convention.  (See http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html.)

Now that the Supreme Court may soon review cases arising from this controversy, I hear for the first time from the Associated Press that questions about Obama's place of birth and citizenship in Indonesia are "conspiracy theories"!

Well, at least we know where the stultification of the American people begins, and where it will hopefully end.

Of course the newsmedia has done nothing to address seriously the many loose ends left hanging by the 9/11 Commission.  And, as per my previous letter, even comparisons with the Mumbai massacre did not induce in our Fourth Estate introspection enough to admit the suspicious seven year lack of routine airport video surveillance evidence of hijackers or even passengers on 9/11.

The same can be said for recent news that the Indian Foreign Minister denies making a call to the Pakistani president.  Yes, we have found that cell phone calls were impossible to make from flying jets as of 9/11, and that Boeing 757s had no air phones; yet people do say they did receive the alleged calls that day.

How?  By impersonation.  How?  By real time digital voice morphing, which would enable, say, the Lebanese singer Farouz to pick up a telephone and sound exactly like Syrian President Bashar al-Asad.

Is this what happened to the President of Pakistan?

Who'd do that?

We must ignore the logic of broadcast propaganda and look to the underlying cause and effect.  We must consider exactly who has the motive, the high tech means and the opportunity to deceive for military, political and criminal ends.

Real time digital voice morphing explains hitherto inexplicable phenomena relating to EgyptAir Flight 990, the attacks of 9/11, the Hariri assassination and now, perhaps, this bogus call from the Indian FM.

Let's investigate 9/11 so that the truth will set us free! 

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:  but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.  Solomon (Proverbs 25:2)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #49 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
11 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
According to RIA Novosti (http://en.rian.ru/russia/20081211/118812388.html), Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin today named a mountain peak in the Caucasus in honor of Russian spies.  The Peak of Russian Counterintelligence Agents serves as a reminder that my 18 January 2002 letter from Arthur Schlesinger, which is the first reference to my theory that CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Jesus Angleton and Anglo American poet T. S. Eliot were one and the same person (indirectly confirmed on 7 April 2003 in Richard Helms's autobiography where he wrote that Angleton had a "not entirely coincidental resemblance to T. S. Eliot"), would make a swell Xmas stocking stuffer for the favorite goy on your list.  I'm sure a small group of East Coast investment bankers can chip in from their Xmas bonuses to meet my price of $2,000.000.00.  I only want to help juice the economy.

Putin's naming a mountain peak according to the 5 December 2008 proposal of the Parliament of the Republic of North Ossetia stands in stark contrast to Croatian President Franjo Tudjman's apparently impromptu naming of the site where US Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown and others perished in a plane crash "St. John's Hill" and, almost in the same breath as I watched and listened on CNN, "St. John's Field."  Due to articles I, Stephen M. St. John, had written suggesting that the UN Charter had become a joke on Yugoslavia in 111 parts, I wonder what Tudjman was thinking.

My Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory promises to rewrite the histories of the Cold War, the JFK assassination and the Jewish state's nuclear weapons program.

Knowing how the Jewish state obtained nuclear weapons is a prerequisite for knowing how to remove them.  Not just the weapons, but the technology too!

The 9/11 Truth Movement has been led to believe that the Twin Towers and WTC7 were brought down mainly by aluminum powdered incendiaries.  However, these military grade explosives do not explain the off the chart seismic spikes.  But energy channeled nuclear devices do.

Let's examine all the motives, means and opportunities for this "New Pearl Harbor."

Stephen M. St. John

For sale!  At http://www.show-the-house.com/id35.html Historic Schlesinger letter pointing to Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory!  For the favorite spy on your Xmas list!  Get rid of Zionist nukes!

Update September 2013:  On her last visit to New York City in 1997, Princess Diana told me she heard from a source that she did not identify that James Jesus Angleton would "pose" as Thomas Stearns Eliot on visits to London.  My "Angleton/Eliot Same Man Theory" does not mean that they were literally one and the same person, although they were in effect one and the same person.  For more background on this, please see http://www.show-the-house.com/id27.html.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #50 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
15 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Judith Miller, the New York Times cheerleader for the unjustified, immoral and illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, the passionate purveyor of the quotations of Curveball, now gushes over the 8 December 2008 appointment of Joseph M. Demarest as the new Assistant Director of the FBI in charge of the New York Regional Office.  (See Miller's article at http://www.show-the-house.com/id77.html.)

Before being pinged to the FBI from Goldman Sachs where he was head of international security, Demarest was one of two "shift commanders" for the FBI's putative investigation of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

David Ray Griffin, in his 2004 book The New Pearl Harbor, and in this year's The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, has accumulated a devastating array of evidence which logically points to a cover-up of what really happened at the Pentagon and WTC on 9/11.  And now we see that an engineer of this cover-up, Demarest, has again gone to his reward.

What else can one say about an investigation that confiscated and withholds videotapes of the attack?  That has not shown one piece of a jet with a serial number stamped into the heat resistant steel alloy?  That has not explained the deaths in the inner rings of the Pentagon?  Or the computers being set on fire spontaneously?  Or the many aeronautical anomalies on display that day?  Etc. etc. etc..

I dare Demarest and Mueller to debate Griffin.  We'll find out why ignoring Griffin has been the FBI's only face-saving argument thus far.

As for Miller and her predilection to dupe Americans into fighting her wars, I turn your attention, Mr. Attorney General, to the dark utterance of Ira Lewis "Scooter" Libby, which came to light during Miller's testimony before a grand jury:

"You went into jail in the summer.... it is fall now.... Out West, where you vacation, the aspens will already be turning.  They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them.  Come back to work – and life."

I ask you, sir, as a Jew, is this not an example of a Jew reminding another Jew about adherence to the Talmudic Law of the Moser?  Does this conspiracy of silence apply to the New Pearl Harbor of 9/11 as well as the Valerie Plame affair?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html (updated) and learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser and the conspiracy of silence it engenders at our nation's peril.

Stephen M. St. John

Update September 2013:  David Ray Griffin, the leading critic of the 9/11 Commission and an inspiration to many including this writer, has been experiencing health issues.  Therefore, as his substitute in a debate with FBI Director Mueller and FBI Assistant Director Demarest, let me propose the Citizen Investigation Team, which is Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis.  Their extraordinary investigation of what happened at the Pentagon on the morning of 11 September 2001 is summarized in their excellent documentary film which can be viewed at http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html.  I dare Mueller and Demarest to respond.  They should be ashamed of themselves.  Griffin and Ranke and Marquis deserve our nation's praise!

Update February 2014:  See http://www.show-the-house.com/id77.html for Judith Miller's article on Demarest.

A

In the nonce I sent by regular mail this offer to Michael Mukasey to coauthor a book with me as a way of eliciting responses to questions and other points raised in this series of open letters on 9/11.

The Honorable Michael B. Mukasey
Attorney General of the United States
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20530

17 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

Would you be interested in co-authoring a book with me?  My series of open letters to you on 9/11 is now at #50 (copy attached) and I believe I have covered all or nearly all the main points that still need to be addressed in any honest investigation of 9/11.  People around the world – not just Americans – deserve to know the truth about 9/11.  I hope you will rise to the challenge.

Very truly yours
Stephen M. St. John

B

I also went for broke and sent by regular mail a similar offer to President Bush to coauthor a book with me as a way of eliciting answers to my questions and other points raised in my series of open letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey.

George W. Bush
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

17 December 2008

President Bush,

Would you be interested in co-authoring a book with me?  My ongoing series of open letters on 9/11 to Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey has raised all or nearly all the main points that still need to be addressed in any full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.  People around the world – not just Americans – deserve to know the truth about 9/11.  You should be able to answer the questions at least as well as the Attorney General.  I hope you will rise to the challenge.  You can read my letters to Mukasey at http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html.

Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #51 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
19 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
What are the odds that Benjamin Netanyahu's Communications Director David Bar Ilan would have a heart attack shortly after my fax broadcast in December 1999 in which I noted that two mysterious airline crashes looked like sabotage in the interests of the Zionist state?

What are the odds that both crashes -- sudden, unexplained nosedives -- were the only ones of their kind in aviation history until the day I began to send a second fax broadcast again suggesting electromagnetic interference in the flight operations of EgyptAir 990 (31 October 1999) and a USAF EC-135N (6 May 1981)?

What are the odds that as I sent that second fax broadcast Alaska Airlines 261 went down in a similar nosedive within sight of Goleta, California, home of Metatech, an industry leader in the science of electromagnetic interference?

(See http://www.metatechcorp.com/.)

Odd odds?

I discerned a pattern of interference in flight operations when I discovered that the 9/11 aerial acrobatics of UA 175 and AA 77 can only be explained by remote control and that Netanyahu had declared 9/11 "good for Israel."

I called on Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon Comptroller on 9/11 with a background in remote control systems, to explain.  A Zionist who had just lost $2.1 trillion of the Pentagon's money and who had suggested a "New Pearl Harbor" to quicken implementation of recommendations for global dominance through military transformations, Zakheim certainly had the motive, means and opportunity to pull off a false flag black intelligence operation.

Now I add the brain trust at Metatech at least as an indispensable way to probe the mysteries of 9/11.

Let's head off the CIA's "limited hangout" through the 9/11 Truth Movement in which aluminum powdered incendiaries offer the only explanation for the controlled demolitions of WTC1, 2 & 7 and mobbed up union members are arrested for setting charges under cover of legitimate work assignments after Silverstein's acquisition of the buildings.

Only advanced, cutting edge science pursued at Sandia Laboratories (See http://www.sandia.gov/) and Applied Research Associates (See http://www.ara.com/) and Metatech can explain the bewildering phenomena noted at "Ground Zero" and the Pentagon.

Off-the-chart seismic spikes indicate mini nukes or EMP weaponry.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id9.html and learn about the similarities in the mysterious crashes of EgyptAir 990 and a USAF EC-135N (a virtual AWACS jet).

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast
Open Letter #52 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
22 December 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
James Jesus Angleton was "Deep Throat" and the lately deceased daft codger Mark Felt but a remotely plausible substitute.

Angleton operated just two blocks NNW of the White House at the Army Navy Club, where there is underground parking suitable for clandestine meetings.

Both Felt, who did not smoke, and Angleton, a heavy smoker in real life as well as on the Silver Screen, were fervent Zionists determined to neutralize Nixon's efforts to investigate Zionist looting of weapons grade nuclear fuel from NUMEC in Apollo, Pennsylvania.

Why do Woodward, Bernstein & the Post tell lies that obfuscate Iran's worthy goal of a Middle East free of WMDs?

The 2005 Felt "revelation" holds in check my theory that Angleton not only was "Deep Throat" but would also pose as the poet T. S. Eliot on visits to London, which, if true, suggests a British or even a Soviet spin on his intrigues.

At a time when the "Downing Street Memo" -- if correctly understood -- threatened to expose British manipulations behind our unjustified invasion of Iraq, the Angleton/Eliot Same Man theory would have compounded the embarrassment with deep historical context.

And by 2005, the proverbial cat was already out of the bag with the 2003 death of Dr. David Kelly and the haunting realization that the British were prompting the USA to live a 13 year lie about WMDs in Iraq.

Murdoch's cartoons of Blair as Bush's poodle prevailed, when the reverse was really true.

Also unbeknownst to the public, Arthur Schlesinger and Richard Helms had quietly given their nod to the Angleton/Eliot Same Man theory.

(See http://www.show-the-house.com/id35.html.)

Where have our grand scale deceits led us?

Our people are stuck on stupid by believing an impossible account of 9/11 featuring no airport videos, impossible cell and air phone calls and explanations of building collapses contradicting scientific descriptions of controlled demolition.

Saudi businessmen have offered $10 million for just one of the shoes thrown at President Bush, even after the shoes were torn apart to search for explosives.

Will the truth also set us free of Zionist nukes?

Stephen M. St. John
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id35.html to buy historic Schlesinger letter.
Under sanctions, 10% discount.  Under crippling sanctions, 20% discount.  No discount if stronger despite sanctions.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #53 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
24 December 2008 Merry Christmas to all!!!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Our Upper East Side neighbor Bernard L. Madoff, who made off with billions of other people's money, is an off shore type of guy, isn't he?

The thought occurred to me as I watched an ingenious seagull fly a few hundred yards inland to drop a clamshell on a paved road so as to crack it open and have a meal.

Judging by the serene smile on Madoff's face, what he did was for the greater good of the Jewish state.  The money did not simply disappear into thin air.  And isn't the Jewish state the USA's largest off-shore aircraft carrier?

The Latin word for our adverb secretly is clam, which is nearly identical in spelling but opposite in meaning to the Latin verb clamare, to shout or proclaim; indeed, some secrets cry out for attention.  How Madoff gamed the system for over a decade can be discerned in the stultifying conventional wisdom of our investigative journalists.

The New York Times reporter Dan Barry serves as a good example.  Recently Barry wrote of a dying Mafioso, "still, ever-faithful to that perverse code of the streets, he seemed insulted when asked about the deeds of others."  ("An Old Mobster Lets Go of a Long-Kept Secret," New York Times, 22 December 2008, page A13)  This is of course a reference to the Mafioso Code of Omertà.

But it is very unlikely that Barry and his ilk are even aware of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which engenders among Jews a systemic conspiracy of silence.  Barry would be out of a job if he ever wrote about the Talmudic Law of the Moser.  You know it and I know it.  That's how Madoff and other members of the Mishpacha reign.

There will be great healing worldwide if we bury the Talmudic Law of the Moser in a deep pit.

That smart seagull who left his feathered friends dropping their clams onto the soft sand also teaches us a very valuable lesson related to 9/11, and this letter is about 9/11, isn't it?

When clamshells fall onto a hard surface, they break into shards.  So too does concrete break into chunks.  But if you look at Richard A. Siegel's video taken from a pier in Hoboken, you will see concrete being pulverized in mid-air, which can only be explained by energy far greater than what a localized jet impact and mechanical collapse can provide.

Tens of thousands of tons of easily respirable particles can only come from high powered explosives.

Any unbiased bird-brain can understand that!

Capisci?

Stephen M. St. John
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html to learn about the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew, an unhealthy phenomenon as real as the Mafioso Code of Omertà!

Clamming up should not be kosher!

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #54 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
30 December 2008  Happy New Year 2009!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I join with Uri Avnery and Israeli peace advocates of Gush Shalom (http://www.gush-shalom.org) in calling for a stop to the cruel and crazy slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza.

I also note how the biased media reporting is the very same as in the case of 9/11.  People who are stuck on stupid know not what they do.  But for how long will they be forgiven for their ignorance?

All the people in the world can be divided into two groups:  those who believe that cell and air phone calls were made by passengers and stewardesses on the allegedly hijacked flights of 9/11, and those who know such calls were impossible to make and that high tech impersonations offer the only explanation for the reported calls.  The former group is stuck on stupid; the latter is dedicated to the pursuit of truth, and justice for the praxis of evil that deceived so many into waging unjustified wars.

Over the course of decades, the Associated Press has regularly made outstanding contributions of Zionist propaganda to keep the American people stuck on stupid.  Just as the AP will not come clean about the impossibility of cell and air phone calls on 9/11, this toastmaster of totalitarianism predictably gives only partial background information about the ongoing war crimes in Gaza.

The AP omits altogether the 4 November 2008 Zionist raid on Gaza, as reported by the Guardian in the UK  (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians-egypt).

Without such knowledge, people cannot ask themselves why Bush and Obama failed to condemn this raid on Election Day in the USA, which the Guardian described as "the first major Israeli air strike on Gaza since June."

Moveover, people cannot ask themselves why Bush and Obama condemn only Hamas attacks made in retaliation to the Zionist attacks.  They remain clueless about the Zionists' decades old "success formula" of provocation and ten-fold retaliation on the responders to the provocation.

The Zionist atrocities are rooted in the hateful ideology of the Talmud (see http://www.come-and-hear.com/), but propaganda conceals this basic fact.

The Zionists err in equating peace with having the upper hand.

Their time is running out!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html for An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #55 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
1 January 2009  May 2009 be the year we all hear the whole truth about 9/11!!!

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
To continue my thread on the Associated Press, let me point out that the Zionist/USA doctrine of shock and awe, so well camouflaged by the AP as valiant self defense in Gaza, now prompts Gush Shalom (http://www.gush-shalom.org) to proclaim, "The government has mounted the tiger of war.  Now it doesn't know how to get off.  All of us will pay the price."

Indeed!

But the AP does not neglect the home front, where last week's false reports would have you believe Philadelphia lawyer Philip J. Berg's challenge to President Elect Obama regarding his qualifications to be President was dismissed by the US Supreme Court.

The truth is that the Justices have set two conferences, for 9 and 16 January, to weigh and consider the grave matter Berg has presented.  Only Berg's petitions for injunctions to stay first the general election, then the Electoral College vote, and finally the 8 January count of the Electoral College vote by the US Congress, have been rejected. http://search.access.gpo.gov/supreme-court/SearchRight.asp?ct=Supreme-Court-Dockets&q1=philip+j.+berg&x=22&y=27

While Berg's arguments based on facts and laws pertaining to Obama's citizenship status and qualifications to be President have yet to be put to the test in a court of law, it is perfectly clear that the AP wants to dumb down the citizenry on vitally important issues both here and abroad.

The news media's connivance in the Big Lie about 9/11 has never been so well documented than in the CNN audio feed to 1010WINS radio station in New York City, which you can hear at the 11:40 minute mark on Richard A. Siegel's film of the WTC building collapses (http://www.911raw.com/).

CNN's Chris Plant, at the Pentagon, related the eyewitness testimony of a USAF senior enlisted man who saw a military helicopter circle the Pentagon and then saw and heard a huge explosion and fireball as the helicopter reached the side of the building next to the helicopter landing zone.

The CNN transmission is promptly cut, and the WINS announcer, Lee, repeats the party line of a jet crash and adds false information that the tail section of the jet was seen by an AP reporter on the scene.

Of course a real investigation of 9/11 will also reveal the praxis of evil's editing "on the fly."

NYC residents only!  Visit http://www.nyc911initiative.org and print out, sign and mail in your petition for a referendum on NYC's November 2009 Mayoral Election ballot which calls for a real investigation of 9/11 and cover-up.  Or call 646 537 1755.

Help spread the word about this effort to fill the void left by officials who have been remiss in their duties.  Please support this ballot initiative!  http://nyc911initiative.org/

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  Philip Berg's arguments based on facts and laws pertaining to Obama's citizenship status and qualifications to be President have never been heard in a court of law because of the lower court ruling that he lacks standing in the matter.  This is most unfortunate.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #56 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
11 January 2008

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
President Elect Barack Obama's choice of Leon Panetta to be the next Director of the CIA ensures business as usual.  Panetta is just another yes-man whose stewardship on the Iraq Study Group serves as a good example.

As I alone pointed out in my fax broadcast of 11 December 2006 (http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html, scroll to that date), the Iraq Study Group reported 5,000 civilian contract personnel in Iraq, whereas the correct figure, we soon found out, is in the order of 100,000.

So do you think Panetta, who could not effectively communicate with the Pentagon, CIA and White House for the ISG, is the kind of guy who can level with the President and tell him, for example, that the cell and air phone calls from jets "hijacked" on 9/11 were all bogus?

If we cannot have a clean break from the Mena Drug Cartel in the Oval office since the days of the death squads in El Salvador, and if we cannot talk honestly about the number of civilian contractors in Iraq today, we certainly cannot fathom to what degree they supplement the military's "shock & awe" doctrine to subdue the people of Iraq -- a people, I might add, who never attacked us in the first place!

British operatives dressed as Arabs and caught in the act with explosives in Basra on 19 September 2005 no doubt represent the tip of the iceberg according to the Brussels Tribunal.  See http://www.brusselstribunal.org/BritishBombers.htm.

To what extent do our Zionist buddies influence the war crimes?  Ehud Barak, the psychopath still unpunished for mass murder of thousands upon thousands of Lebanese in 1982, is now buying his 2009 election with white phosphorous bombs and the blood of hundreds of children in Gaza.

Propaganda, war profiteering and immorality reign.

Only a CIA Director who will get real information and level with the POTUS can bring about the change that Obama has promised.

But before we move on, we need to go back and confront the truth and consequences of 9/11, and take the other turn in the road not taken before.

Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11, yet we have no routine video surveillance images.

Why?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id69.html and read letter to Chief Justice Roberts on question of Barack Obama's qualifications to be President of the USA.

Stephen M. St. John
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/.

Update September 2013:  By way of clarification, we have not seen any 9/11 airport surveillance video evidence whatsoever from Newark Liberty International Airport and Boston Logan International Airport.  The video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a time-stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence pertaining to alleged hijackings on 9/11.  The video from Portland Maine International Airport is problematic for many reasons.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #57 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
12 January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
People around the world are troubled by Zionism's full spectrum fraud and force in Gaza, and are at a loss to deal effectively with a chronic problem that has plagued the 20th Century and now threatens this young century.

Why does the holy name Israel stink so badly?

Consider this tale of three walls:  If the Zionists were the real deal (namely the House of Israel and the House of Judah, both prophesied to return to the Holy Land) we would have seen by now a wall of stones with the entire Torah engraved on it, as commanded in Deuteronomy 27:2-3.

Instead, we see an altogether different kind of wall, the wall of separation, which is not only illegal according to international law, but belies the very words of Moses on exactly how he and his people would be separated (Exodus 33:16).

Lastly, I find that communicating with you is like talking to a wall!  You cannot gainsay my presentments!

So these three walls tell me the Zionists aren't really who they say they are and that you and your fellow Zionists know 9/11 truth will be the undoing of Zionism.

Please read my Ersatz Israel at http://www.show-the-house.com/id55.html.  Discover your Khazar roots!

Getting back to 1010WINS radio on 9/11, which was recorded live on Richard A. Siegel's video of the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers (http://www.911raw.com/), I ask, how could FOX News give a report of an explosion near the Supreme Court Building in Washington when there was no such explosion?  Why such disinformation?

According to 28 United States Code paragraph 372 (c), my petition and complaint at the 11th Circuit Judicial Council had the potential to be referred by the chief judges there to the annual Judicial Conference convened by Chief Justice Rehnquist on the morning of 11 September 2001.

This potential was neutralized when a US Marshall evacuated Rehnquist and 26 of the most senior judges in the USA out a side door into the street.

My petition had all to do with the USS Liberty and the occupied Golan Heights of Syria.

Was the falsely reported bomb a signal that this very real risk to Zionist public relations concerns had been obviated by the events of 9/11?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id18.html and read A 9/11 Timeline:  Did Laughter of the Judges Make the WTC Towers 1, 2 & 7 Fall on 9/11?

(28 USC 372(c) is now 28 USC 351 - 364; this law was changed 2 November 2002.)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update February 2014:  Exodus 33:16 gives a spiritual concept of separation for the children of Israel; namely, their separation is defined only by the presence of the Almighty among them, and not by walls, ghettos, shtetls, overt or covert restrictive covenants in property deeds and national trusts, international borders or even the decisions on admission made by condominium and cooperative apartment boards.  Just as the priestly tribe of Levi had no inheritance of land among all the other tribes of Israel, but lived in the lands of all the other tribes, so too will the descendants of Israel live alone spiritually among all the nations of the earth, but they "shall not be reckoned among the nations" according to the word of the Almighty which was spoken by Balaam (Numbers 23:9).  The Zionist state is not the real deal!

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #58 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
16 January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
As our Zionist buddies smother the lives of so many civilians with cruel implements of war, including illegal white phosphorous, let us bear in mind the chronic suffering of the people of Palestine in terror campaigns and waves of ethnic cleansing leading to the founding of the Jewish state, and the "divide and conquer" policies, including stolen elections, still perpetrated against them.

Secretary of State Rice, who vacillated in seeking cease fires in Lebanon in 2006 and now Gaza in 2009, was formerly Provost of Stanford University, home of the Hoover Institute.  It was Herbert Hoover who campaigned in 1937 for the "transfer" of Palestinian Arabs from their lands to make room for our Zionist buddies even as a Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, adopted "transfer" as its official policy.

So Rice appears to have deep roots in an international enterprise that, by gradual degrees of fraud and force, is dispossessing a valiant people who are now resisting their own genocide.

Not an "even-handed broker of peace," Rice has only quickened the siege mentality of the Khazar-descended Ashkenazis who are of Turkic origin and are not the blood of Abraham.

So Rice, like Cheney and Bush, knows what's good for the Jewish state.

So tell me, Mr. Attorney General, does separation of church and state mean separation of synagogue and state?

If so, has our failure to remove an obvious double standard explain why Miss Rice, like Cheney and Bush, was not duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth when she gave testimony before the 9/11 Commission?

After all, inasmuch as the Beebster, Benjamin Netanyahu, said more than once that 9/11 was "good for Israel," wouldn't you think the 9/11 Commission's unequal and exceptional treatment of Cheney, Bush and Rice raises red flags with regard to the integrity of its investigations?

Do these red flags lead to Silverstein, Odigo, Ptech, ICTS-International, Comverse, Amdocs, Urban Moving System, the Dovster (Dov Zakheim), Mossad, the Mob, the Syndicate etc.?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html and read An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem.  Let's transform our Zionist buddies from larva stage to big beautiful butterflies!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #59 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
18 January 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Were I Captain Chesley Sullenberger, who, with all engines lost, glided his US Airways Airbus to a safe, emergency belly landing in the Hudson Fjord, I would deeply resent my having to pee in a cup for the National Transportation Safety Board.  What a way to treat a hero!

But the Sullenbergers will attend the Inauguration in Washington next Tuesday, and I think this real hero's US Airways jet is an apt symbol of our ship of state as we are finally rid of Bush and stand on a wing and a prayer in the aftermath of his bloody lies, secrecy, destruction and waste.

There's much to do on an emergency basis.  I hope we all act with the verve and alacrity of the ferrymen who rescued the crew and passengers of Flight 1549.  May the Almighty guide and protect us!

Just as the black boxes will ultimately reveal details of a miracle on the Hudson, a real investigation of 9/11 will help us better to understand our past so as to illuminate our future.

Why would the AP report recovery of the tail section of the jet that allegedly hit the Pentagon when there was no recovery of any identifiable part whatsoever?  (Clarification:  There was no recovery of any identifiable part of a commercial airliner whatsoever!)

Who was the senior USAF enlisted man who told CNN a helicopter was present when the explosion and fireball occurred at the Pentagon?

Who at Fox News said a bomb went off near the Supreme Court Building when no such event took place?

You can hear all these reports on 1010WINS radio, which is an integral part of the soundtrack of Richard A. Siegel's video recording of the controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center.

See http://www.911raw.com/.  This video and the seismic record together give 9/11 best evidence.

"We must respond to terrorism by championing the rule of law, not subordinating it, for it is the cornerstone of the democratic society."  The UK Foreign Minister's good advice will serve us well.

See http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/15/david-miliband-war-terror.

So will Labour MP Gerald Kaufman's repudiation of the cruel and crazy war crimes of his fellow Zionists in Gaza guide us to real peace.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMGuYjt6CP8.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html and read An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem.  Let's transform our Zionist buddies from larva stage into big beautiful butterflies!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #60 on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey & Eric Holder
19 January 2009  In Memoriam:  Reverend Martin Luther King

Dear Messrs. Attorneys General,
The great English poet John Milton wrote "hope never comes that comes to all"; though the new administration certainly brings hope to very many, I remain steadfast in my hope, howsoever well deferred it may be, that new people and new thinking at the US Department of Justice will recognize the need for a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11 and give it the highest priority.

For in a very real sense, the invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11, yet we have no credible video surveillance evidence of any of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at these airports, a very unusual circumstance which has never been explained.

Couple this fact with another fact -- that cell and air phone calls were technically not possible, yet such calls were supposedly made -- and we have a second red flag strongly indicating a deception known in the intelligence community as a "false flag black op."

Among the very few with the combined motive, means and opportunity to pull off such a black operation involving high tech means including PROMIS and Ptech software overriding and intervening in US Government computer systems is the Jewish state, and you, Mr. Attorney General Mukasey, are a Zionist Jew whose judgment may very well be clouded by conflicts of interest.

And you, Mr. Attorney General Holder, have already had your buttons pressed by Zionists and their agents in the cases of fugitive from justice Marc Rich and the rainmaking for his entirely undeserved pardon.  I certainly hope you have learned a good lesson and are the wiser for it.

If you search my fax broadcasts you will see I give circumstantial evidence potentially linking Jonathan Pollard and Marc Rich as brokers of commodities involving tanker ships in the early 1980s.  I have wondered if Mr. Pollard's generous offers to others might have involved PROMIS software.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

At http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html you can read all my previous letters to your predecessor; I am ready to assist you in any way I can, up to and including overseeing a real investigation of 9/11.

Let me get my hands on the bastards who did this crime even if they're Jews!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id1.html and read An Eight Part Peace Proposal for Greater Jerusalem.  Let's transform our Zionist buddies from larva stage into big beautiful butterflies!

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #01 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
4 February 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Congratulations on your new and very important role as our nation's Attorney General.  I wish you success in all your endeavors at the US Department of Justice.

President Obama has promised change, and there is no part of our government which needs change more than the Department of Justice.  Wrongdoing that is ignored and goes unpunished sets a very bad example and undermines confidence in our public institutions.

And no greater example of wrongdoing is the cover-up of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth with respect to 9/11.  I ask that you look into this matter and give it your highest priority.  I offer my help.

In October of 2001, not long after 9/11, the Taliban offered to deliver Osama Bin Laden to the US Government upon receipt of good prima facie evidence showing he and his group were the real perpetrators.  Bush treated this offer with contempt, and you know the rest.

Do we really need more troops in Afghanistan when 9/11 evidence would have and could have done just fine?

I firmly believe we must go back to that fork in the road where we took the wrong turn and start over again.

The recently deceased Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (requiescat in pace!) convened a private symposium of military and commercial aviation professionals from 16 to 19 September 2001 and reported the group's unanimous conclusion to the Joint Chiefs of Staff:  the aerial vehicles could not have been flown by flight students on their maiden voyages in big jets.

Rather, such daredevil aerial acrobatics as evinced by the aircraft that hit the Pentagon and WTC2 could only have been done by remote control.

From day one, certain people knew these flights were beyond the capabilities of even seasoned pilots.  But rather than eliciting their testimonies and analyses, we have drifted along in a conspiracy of silence with devastating consequences for millions of innocent people.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

We need to go back!

I urge you to conduct a real investigation of 9/11.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General Mukasey.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id70.html for Donn de Grand Pré interview and obituary.

Stephen M. St. John
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #02 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
12 February 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I write again in the hope that I will prevail upon you to reopen the investigation of 9/11 so that better understanding of our past will illuminate our present condition and the steps we still need to take.

In my previous letter I explained how the late Colonel Donn de Grand Pré established remote control as the only possible explanation for the highly unusual flight paths of at least two of the four flights of 9/11.  De Grand Pré did this within a week of 9/11, yet the expert testimonies that he gathered were ignored and suppressed in favor of the illogical official conspiracy theory.

But there are other equally compelling reasons to commence a real investigation of 9/11.

For example, cell and air phone calls early on became central to the news media accounts of hijackings on board the jets.  These news media accounts were later adopted by the 9/11 Commission as an essential part of the official story.  But such cell and air phone calls were impossible to make!

A Canadian university mathematics professor, A. Kee Dewdney (http://physics911.net), conducted his own experiments and found that cell phone calls are virtually impossible from very high altitude or at a jet's cruising speed.  My own inquiries, including a USAF Public Affairs officer, confirm the technical impossibility of making cell phone calls from jets at cruising altitudes or speeds.  Furthermore, a researcher for Pilots for 9/11 Truth (http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org) contacted American Airlines and obtained confirmation that its 757s do not have air phones.

So you see, there are very significant problems with the official story.

Strong indications of remote control piloting and bogus air and cell phone calls combine to raise red flags indicating the need for a new investigation.

Again, I urge you to conduct such a new investigation.  This is your jurisdiction.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html for 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General Mukasey.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #03 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
19 February 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me pick up the thread of my argument for a new investigation of 9/11, where I mentioned strong indications of remote control piloting and bogus air and cell phone calls as main components of a conspiracy.

My colleague at the US Department of Commerce saw the jet over New York harbor as it homed in on the south tower WTC2.  He was astounded to see one wing pointing straight up to the sky and the other straight down to the water before leveling off and reaching Manhattan.  Other eyewitnesses, including personnel in the Newark Airport control tower, witnessed this highly unusual attitude of a large jet banking hard left at very high speed.

The jet's unerring descending arc of flight into its target created G forces that would have rendered even a seasoned pilot incapable of the maneuver, let alone a flight student on his maiden voyage.  So you see, the story of Arab hijackers is not the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

After our US Department of Commerce office on the 37th floor of 26 Federal Plaza had been evacuated shortly after the hit on WTC2, I arrived and briefly viewed the burning Twin Towers from the southwest corner office.  A little more than 100 feet away, on the same floor at the southeast corner of the building, is the New York Regional Office of the US Air Force.  In hindsight, I see that the jet that hit WTC2 was heading right for this USAF office, but was lined up to hit the south tower first.  This, in black and white on this page, is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!

My own observations, and those of my colleague and other competent eyewitnesses, corroborate the independent findings of the late Colonel Donn de Grand Pré's group, that the attacking jets of 9/11 could only have been flown by remote control.  These findings, which were put into the hands of members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff within weeks of 9/11, were not considered at all by the 9/11 Commission.

Instead, the 9/11 Commission ratified news media accounts of the events which depend on bogus air and cell phone calls.

The need for a real investigation of 9/11 is quite clear.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #04 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
26 February 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me please continue with my exposition on the need for a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.

In previous letters I have dwelt on strong indications that remote control piloting was involved in at least two of the four flights and that the government's official story rests on bogus air and cell phone calls.  Just these two elements warrant renewed investigation.

Now consider the suspicious lack of video surveillance images at the three airports of 9/11.

As I stood watching the immediate aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center from the southwest corner of the Federal Building on the 37th floor (about 100 feet away from the New York office of the US Air Force in the southeast corner where that jet was headed as it hit its target WTC2), right next to me was the office of my boss, Marion Britton.  She was on Flight 93 rising out of Newark at that very moment.  I know I never saw Marion again, but for reasons explained here as well as in future letters, I simply can no longer believe the "Let's roll" scenario and all the rest.

At first I wondered why I was never shown -- and never found -- any video surveillance images of Marion at Newark Airport.  Gradually I came to realize we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11.  How can this be explained?  Why am I still asking for an explanation seven years after the attacks?

And not only have we not had any explanation for the mysterious lack of routine video surveillance evidence from the airports, we as a nation have been badly fooled by endless TV broadcast images of two suspects passing a metal detector at Portland, Maine International Airport.

So we have misdirection on top of curious omission.

To recapitulate:  No videos!  Bogus air and cell phone calls!  Flight paths that can only be explained by remote control technology!

It is time to abandon the "19 Arab hijackers" conspiracy theory and conduct a real investigation.  Let's begin!

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

UPDATE September 2013:  The surveillance video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of hijackers passing through the Main Terminal on the morning of 11 September 2001.  On top of that we have NEVER seen ANY surveillance video evidence whatsoever from Newark Liberty and Boston Logan International Airports.  And so I repeat:  we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11.  How can this be explained?  Why am I still asking for an explanation twelve years after the attacks?  As for Flight 93, a German researcher named "Woody Box" has presented intriguing possibilities regarding the truth of what really happened, including a safe landing at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport!  Google his name for more.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #05 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
3 March 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
If patently bogus cell and air phone calls, and obvious lack of routine airport video surveillance evidence, plus sure indications of remote control piloting of at least two of the four aerial vehicles used in the attacks of 9/11, still do not convince you that a real investigation is in order, let me please press on with my expostulation.

Take for example American Airlines Flight 11, which allegedly opened the attacks when it struck the north tower WTC1.  This surprise attack was filmed by the Naudet brothers at Lispenard and Church Streets, three quarters of a mile to the North Northeast of WTC1.  Researchers have noted three trucks parked side by side, which gave a protective area in the street for the cameraman, who swung the camera to focus on the point of impact just ahead of the jet.  Perhaps this was just luck, but there are those, myself included, who wonder and would like to probe to know more.

I viewed an original copy of the Naudet brothers' film after it was passed to officials in the Fire Department of New York.  For me, the bottom line is, I see no engine pods under the wings, which, if the jet was correctly described as a 767, should be clearly visible from three quarters of a mile away. (Three quarters of a mile is the distance, say, between the UN campus and the opposite shore of the East River.)  So you see, with no engine pods, I find the official story is preposterous.

Even though the Naudet brothers' film is the only known video of the first attack, and was not broadcast until the next day, President George W. Bush twice said he saw the impact of the first jet live on a TV screen before entering the classroom where, minutes later, Andrew Card brought news of the second attack.  These strange utterances by Bush need investigation.  And if there is equality under the law, Bush and his cronies should be under oath when deposed by a new 9/11 investigatory commission.  I'd like to ask George if he noticed engine pods under the wings.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read letter #1 to AG Mukasey with links to White House transcripts of George W. Bush's bizarre claims that he saw the first jet hit on 9/11.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  It should be pointed out again for emphasis that the engine pods of a Boeing 767 jet are humongous and hard to miss from less than a mile away.  I don't see engine pods on that aerial vehicle filmed by the Naudet brothers as it crashed into the north Twin Tower, WTC1!

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #06 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
12 March 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
In my previous five letters I have stated the case for remote control of the attacking aerial vehicles on 9/11, bogus air and cell phone calls from alleged passengers on these aircraft, and total lack of credible video surveillance images of any of the passengers or alleged hijackers at the three major, high security airports from which the flights of 9/11 are alleged to have departed.

I repeat that these circumstances present at the very least strong prima facie evidence of a false flag intelligence operation and fully integrated cover-up.  And I also repeat that the questions raised warrant a new investigation, which you can create, and I ask you to do so.

The recent Associated Press reports of confessions by tortured inmates of Guantanamo are propaganda at its worst.  These "confessed" masterminds of 9/11 cannot possibly explain remote control piloting, bogus cell and air phone calls and routine airport video surveillance evidence gone missing.  We have to look elsewhere.

And even though President Obama expressed a desire not to look back, but to go forward, I submit to you that the crimes of 9/11 were simply too great in magnitude to overlook, and that only a real investigation will allow proper confrontation of our past to illuminate our future and proper measures to be taken.

You know how difficult it is to grapple with a mindset conducive to lynchings.  This is the task:  to confront a high tech lynching of Arabs.

When you consider the substandard response of NORAD during aerial wargames being conducted at precisely the same time as the 9/11 attacks, you must take into account the likelihood of infiltration of computer systems for the purposes of intervention and sabotage.  This, I believe, is how the aerial attacks of 9/11 were carried out.

Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn (http://www.bollyn.com/) has led us to a Massachusetts computer software company named Ptech, which in the years and months leading up to 9/11 was positioned to place into US Government computer systems software that allowed such infiltration for purposes of intervention and sabotage.

Shall we check Ptech out?

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html for Open Letters on 9/11 to US Attorney General Eric Holder.  (#3 has been augmented with two photos showing jet homing in on USAF office in New York.)

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  Every American should read Christopher Bollyn's book, Solving 9-11:  The Deception That Changed The World at http://bollyn.com/public/Solving_9-11_-_The_Deception_That_Changed_The_World.pdf.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #07 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
16 March 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Don't you agree that 9/11 truth will kill the beast?

Don't you agree that without the truth, there can be no justice?  And without justice there can be no peace?

So how can you be contentedly passive with respect to routine airport surveillance videos gone missing?

Or to high tech voice impersonations by cell and airphone?

Or to obvious indications of remote control piloting?

Don't you want to sift through the software company Ptech and find out how our command, control and communications were very likely compromised on 9/11 and by whom?

Remember that unjustified, immoral and illegal invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11, and that there is not a scintilla of credible evidence that the alleged hijackers were even at these airports or on these planes.  The 9/11 Commission essentially ratified dubious news reports which virtually convicted Osama bin Laden before the Twin Towers fell.

Though 9/11 was basically a computer crime, the targets also reveal even more evidence of fraud and force.

At ground zero in New York we have evidence not only of military grade aluminum powdered incendiaries, but of even greater high energy explosives that registered off-the-chart spikes on Columbia University's seismograph, that evaporated heat resistant alloyed steel, that left pools of molten metal for weeks after the attacks, that laterally displaced steel beams weighing tons at distances equal to the lengths of two football fields, that pulverized concrete into particles of microscopic dimensions and that caused burn wounds similar to those encountered at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Here on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, I and many others remember the distinctive smell of an electrical fire which hanged in the air for weeks after 9/11 even though we were 7 miles upwind of Ground Zero.  Such smell is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation.

All of these facts have been confirmed but have been studiously avoided by official investigations and the news media.

Will you be our 9/11 Truth Champion?

You have jurisdiction.        

The time to act is now.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html to read this letter and all previous open letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #08 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
22 March 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
With joy and great anticipation I share with you and the international community in Washington and here in New York City, every member of the US Congress, House and Senate, as well as other organizations and individuals, public and private, advance notice of an upcoming 9/11 moment of truth.

If all goes according to plan, your own Assistant FBI Director for Public Affairs, John Miller, will be a guest on James Zogby's Viewpoint this Thursday at 6PM EDT.

Zogby heads the Arab American Institute (http://www.aaiusa.org), which he founded shortly after the assassination of our dear friend and colleague Alex Odeh in the 1985 bombing of an American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee office near Los Angeles.

Miller has been at the nexus of show biz and crime reporting for decades, and is perhaps best known for his interview with Osama Bin Laden in 1998, which laid the foundation for the background stories and innuendo leading to Bin Laden's virtual conviction before the smoking Twin Towers finally collapsed.

Nearly eight years after 9/11, Zogby may very well reverse Bin Laden's queered chances of a fair trial.

Zogby will have the opportunity to ask Miller this four part question:

(1)  Now, after more than seven full years, we have still not seen ANY credible video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers, let alone hijackers, at ANY of the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed.  How can this be explained?

(2)  Each airport had the highest "Category X" security rating.  So how could ALL three airports fail to produce ANY routine video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers exactly simultaneously?

(3)  And isn't it a little suspicious that we were shown two suspects passing through a metal detector at Portland Maine International Airport over and over again ad infinitum? Many people to this day think these images were from Logan airport in Boston.

(4)  As disturbing as all of this is to me -- and this is just the tip of the iceberg with regard to 9/11 -- what is worse is the FBI's seemingly total lack of curiosity and stonewalling of those who ask questions.  Will we see real change at the FBI in this regard?

Show us and the Taliban the proof!

Visit http://www.aaiusa.org/dr-zogby/38/viewpoint for details of Dr. Zogby's interview with the FBI's John Miller at 6PM EDT this Thursday 26 March 2009.

Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update 2013:  To clarify, the video surveillance tape from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of alleged hijackers there on the morning of 11 September 2013.  We have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #09 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
2 April 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
April Fools' Day has left us unscathed, and I thank the Almighty and Eternally Vigilant Creator of this world and all other worlds.

The price of Liberty is our own vigilance, and we all can and must make a contribution toward this end.  So I persist in my endeavor to get to the bottom of the missing, routine video surveillance tapes of passengers and hijackers at the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed.

This issue, together with irrefutable evidence of bogus cell and air phone calls from these flights, as well as of piloting by remote control, indicates the need for a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.

Last week my anticipated opportunity to question your FBI's Assistant Director for Public Affairs, John Miller, who was a guest on James Zogby's TV program Viewpoint, was rudely terminated before I could utter a full sentence.  Zogby and Miller did a hit and run by quickly stating they had seen 9/11 airport video evidence.

This prompted me to contact a few of my former colleagues at the US Department of Commerce, who unanimously confirmed they had never seen video surveillance evidence of our Assistant Regional Director Marion Britton, who we were told was on United Airlines Flight 93 which crashed in Pennsylvania.  They all told me the only video evidence they had seen was of Mohammad Atta and a companion passing through a metal detector.  Like most Americans, they erroneously believed these images came from Logan International Airport in Boston, when in fact they came from Portland Maine International Airport.  A fair jury would relish the distinction.

These considerations of truth and justice impinge on our sovereignty.  Missing in our deliberations on Afghanistan and Iraq is a fair answer to the Taliban's reasonable request to former President George W. Bush:  "Show us the evidence and we will deliver Osama Bin Laden."

Though the invasions and occupations of both countries began, in effect, at these airport gates, we have yet to show accountability to the Taliban or even the American people.

The best way out of Afghanistan and Iraq is to find out how we arrived there in the first place.

We need a real investigation of 9/11.

Where there is no vision, the people perish.
Proverbs of Solomon 29:18

Stephen M. St. John
website http://www.show-the-house.com/

Update September 2013:  According to Wikipedia, John Miller is the god-child of the wife of Mafioso capo Frank Costello, whose friends included FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and Miller's father, who was a journalist.  It is noteworthy how crime and news & entertainment tend to stay in the family.  After 9/11 and the resultant invasion, the opium production in Afghanistan, which the Taliban had nearly eradicated, increased.

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #10 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
8 April 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
The FBI's Assistant Director for Public Affairs, John Miller, is a superficial ninny and celebrity toady who likes big cigars and limousine arrivals more than hard, cold facts about missing video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers at the airports of 9/11.  He also lacks the manly virtue to return my call and hear the unpleasant truth, and this I find insulting not only to me but also to my former colleagues at the US Department of Commerce who back my assertion that we have never seen routine video surveillance evidence of our Assistant Regional Director Marion Britton at Newark Airport before she boarded United Airlines Flight 93.  They only know of the Portland Maine International Airport tape of Mohammad Atta and companion, which they, like millions if not billions of others, were tricked into believing was filmed in Boston.

I pinpoint the lack integrity at the FBI which extends to many other crucial points in the cover-up related to the events of 9/11.  When a BIG LIE is so interwoven into the core components of our government, our sovereignty is compromised.  This explains the idiotic statement of Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, "We need to make sure we know what the appeal of the Taliban is."  Well, the cause of the Taliban is just, and the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan are not.  The Taliban said to Bush, "Show us the evidence that Osama Bin Laden perpetrated the attacks of 9/11, and we will deliver him to you."

The USA cannot play straight with its own people, let alone the Taliban.

The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began, in effect, at the airport gates of 9/11, and here we must consider the Dutch company ICTS-International which controlled security at Logan.  With a single exception, its board of directors consists of nationals of the Jewish state who have military intelligence backgrounds.  A Co-Chairman has a history of corruption leading to the Prime Minister's office, whose present occupant is a psychopath who more than once said that 9/11 was "good for Israel."

Indeed, 9/11 fulfilled the Zionist wish to put American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol.

Stephen M. St. John

Read "9/11 Dutch Treat?" at http://www.rense.com/general68/dutch.htm

Read "9/11 Double Dutch Treat?  Will two lips from Holland reveal the magic Dutch Boys?" at http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html (Scroll to fax broadcast of 6 January 2007; Internet Explorer is recommended for this page.)

Update 2013:  To clarify, the video surveillance tape from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of alleged hijackers there on the morning of 11 September 2001.  We have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11.  Also, according to Wikipedia, John Miller is the god-child of the wife of Mafioso capo Frank Costello, whose friends included FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and Miller's father, who was a journalist.  It is noteworthy how crime and news & entertainment tend to stay in the family.  After 9/11 and the resultant invasion, the opium production in Afghanistan, which the Taliban had nearly eradicated, increased.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #11 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
14 April 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
The 6 April 2009 news out of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark reminded me of what New York's 1999 Nobel Laureate in Medicine at Rockefeller University, Günter Blobel, once said:  "If you cannot explain it to your grandmother, it is not good science."

Blobel remembers from his childhood seeing the civilian target, Dresden, burn so bright you could read a newspaper at night; 64 years later, discovery of active thermitic material in dust samples taken by local residents from ground zero of the World Trade Center confirms what journalists fear to write:  9/11 was an inside job.

Listen to lead scientist and co-author of this groundbreaking report at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o

or at

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Freedom.htm?EdNo=001&At=048645

and read the report at

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM.

An episode of the TV comedy series Get Smart produced during construction of the World Trade Center has suggested to some researchers that explosives were mixed into the building materials as a precaution against unforeseen circumstances that would require emergency demolition.  Be that as it may, this University of Copenhagen paper by Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley and Larsen shows a much more advanced military grade of nano-thermitic material from the debris of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center than what was available in the late 1960s.

Above all, these brave scientists demonstrate the need for a new investigation, one that will ask the right questions, including, who placed these advanced aluminum nano-powdered incendiaries into WTC 1, 2 & 7?

And to recapitulate from previous letters, the unexplained lack of video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers at Logan, Liberty and Dulles airports on 9/11, together with bogus cell and air phone calls and strong indications of remote control piloting of at least two if not all four of the flights of 9/11, constitute good grounds for a new investigation.

Dark shadows of doubt cover the official conspiracy theory from beginning to end, from airports to targets.

Stephen M. St. John

See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey at http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html

and

Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder at http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html.

Update October 2013:  The link given above to the scientific report has been corrupted, but you can obtain a PDF copy by clicking http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf.

C

Evidence of censorship on the Internet with respect to 9/11?  You decide!  Read this delivery failure notification from Verizon:

This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:

  Message-id: <5837B863127E464BBC9831D787898468@MetatronPC>

  Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:37:41 -0500

  From: "Stephen M. St. John" metatron.metatron@verizon.net

  To: "Dr. Niels H. Harrit" harrit@nano.ku.dk

  Subject: Open Letter #11 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder

Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:

  Recipient address: harrit@nano.ku.dk

  Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address

  Diagnostic code: smtp;554 5.7.1 <vms173003pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.3]>: Client host rejected: Access denied

  Remote system: dns;mail.fys.ku.dk (TCP|206.46.173.3|46437|130.225.102.43|25) (mail.fys.ku.dk ESMTP Postfix)

Does the truth about 9/11 ignite fear in the minds of the real terrorists?

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #12 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
23 April 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me reiterate that once we get past the state of denial about bogus cell and air phone calls, routine airport surveillance videos gone missing and indications of remote control piloting, we can start asking the necessary questions to solve the unsolved crime of 9/11.

As a former US Department of Commerce employee who worked under Marion Britton, who, I've been told, was on United Airlines Flight 93, let me comment on the various published reports that she "phoned a longtime friend, Fred Fiumano ... sometime after 9:30."

Bearing in mind that cell phone calls are technically impossible from jets in flight, and that the organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth was apprised by American Airlines that 757 jets were not equipped with seat-back air phones, I also note the implausibility of the falsely constructed story itself.

Mr. Fiumano very likely received a call from someone impersonating Marion with a high tech software known as real time digital voice morphing.

Moreover, Marion failed to follow procedure to call the office whenever a problem would arise, which is strange indeed because Marion knew and taught the drill, and practiced what she preached.

The office was evacuated by 9:10 AM (I was the last one out) and nobody was there to take her call, but she could have and would have left a recorded message.  However, key personnel told me there was no recorded message.

Equally weird are reports that Marion used a borrowed cell phone because hers was not working.  Marion always carried a cell phone issued to her by the US Department of Commerce.  If she had a problem with it, she could have easily replaced it when she was in the office the previous day.

What does all of this mean?

The evildoers had inside knowledge of our office procedures.

They had to omit Marion's government issued Motorola from their narrative because such a call could be traced.

They also knew the office would be evacuated by the time the impersonation was to be made.

And even if such a normally expected call to the office was actually made, confidentiality laws would have long delayed the emotional contents from the news media.

The evildoers wanted another story to back the bogus call between the Olsons.

See http://pilotsfor911truth.org/amrarticle.html.

Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html and read past Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder.

Stephen M. St. John

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #13 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
30 April 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,

What a week!

First Air Force One and an F-16 fighter jet flying in tandem make a startling visit over New York harbor so reminiscent of the jet that hit the south Twin Tower WTC2 on 9/11 as to start a panic.

Then, in a blow to US foreign policy in the Middle East, four Lebanese generals falsely accused of the Hariri assassination are freed by the special tribunal in the Hague after more than three years in prison without ever being charged.

See http://www.1010wins.com/Photos-Video--Recriminations-after-Jet-Flyover-Pho/4286293.

Let's hope President Obama can scrape this Texas justice dog do off his shoe and begin anew.

The Bush Administration was first to point its finger at the "evildoers" who supposedly killed Hariri, and now we finally find out the evidence isn't even sufficient to detain the generals.  Germany had vaulted into the curious 5 + 1 configuration in the Security Council as part of Bush's carrot and stick approach and was on its sovereign knees by overturning court decisions in the Motassadeq case.  In its darkest hour, Germany allowed secret substitute testimony from a US Attorney.  And now we hear the feckless German Detlev Mehlis, who caused the generals' imprisonment, make excuses.

See http://www.almustaqbal.org/news_details.php?id=NDA4Mjk=&t=29.

The USA lacks integrity abroad.  And a dismal situation persists at home, where the New York City Police Department, apprised of Air Force One's flyby in advance, did not advise the public or even the mayor.

But maybe there was a compelling reason to limit advance notice?

Was the USAF testing my theory, stated in letter #3, that the aerial vehicle that flew over the harbor into WTC2 was flying by remote control and homing in on the US Air Force office in the Federal Building at Broadway and Duane Street?

Letter #3, dated 19 February 2009, was followed by Admiral Mike Mullen's 2 April visit to lower Manhattan, not long before the 27 April flyby.

With the right equipment aboard, this Air Force One jet may very well have been conducting experiments and data collection to explain the 595 mph unerring descending arc flown by the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower.

Please consider this to be informed speculation by a material witness who's been ignored thus far.

See http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html and scroll to letter #3 which includes a photo of approaching jet and Google Earth map showing how its trajectory was toward the USAF NY Regional Office.

Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #14 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
7 May 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Now that you are "in like Flynn" at the head of the Department of Justice, it appears to me that one of your major obstacles to a real investigation of 9/11 is former White House Counsel Jack Quinn, whose manipulations were decisive in obtaining the outrageous pardon of our Zionist Buddy Mark Rich.

Recalling Zionist Buddy Bibi Netanyahu's repeated statements that 9/11 was "good for Israel," and noting the logical inference that Netanyahu believes 9/11 to have been worth it, I draw your attention to an interesting correlation between the Washington public affairs firm Quinn Gillespie & Associates LLC and several corporate entities all with interests in propping up the discredited 9/11 Commission Report.

Quinn Gillespie has given strategic insight and counsel in government relations to General Electric's NBC Universal, the Screen Actors Guild, and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, all of whom combined to produce the movie "Flight 93."  How ironic it was to see actors and actresses portray the passengers and alleged hijackers even though none appeared on video surveillance cameras at Newark's Liberty International Airport!  This film is Zionist propaganda ad nauseam.

Other Quinn Gillespie clients have included at least two with glaring conflicts of interest.  The Silverstein Group, led by Lucky Zionist Buddy Larry Silverstein, and Zurich Financial Services Corporation, one of the insurance companies locked in litigation when Silverstein cashed in on his 49 day old insurance premium for the World Trade Center, both assiduously avoided copious evidence of controlled demolition lest it block the desired outcome.

An unnamed "confidential" (pre-September 2008) Fortune 100 financial services corporation no doubt had a part to play too.

Quinn Gillespie's clients clearly mark exactly where the legal discovery process ends and the cover-up flourishes with respect to 9/11.

Their strategic insight and counsel perpetuate the BIG LIE and a national nightmare in the interests of their own bottom line and, yes Bibi, the Zionist state.

Quinn Gillespie & Associates at the Epicenter of the 9/11 Cover-up?
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html and scroll to 10 July 2006
(Best viewed with Internet Explorer).

Stephen M. St. John

Update January 2014:  Jack Quinn now serves alongside John Ashcroft among others on the Board of Directors of Academi, which was previously known as Xe and before that as the infamous Blackwater.  These war profiteers still continue to gain lucrative government contracts for their "elite training and trusted protection" while very tellingly displaying the constellation Ursa Major, or the "Big Dipper," on their logo, which appears on a coin that is sold on their website's "proshop."  Perhaps showing loss of confidence, their tee-shirt displaying the cross of the crusading Knights Templar is no longer available there.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #15 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
14 May 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Our newsmedia has once again disappointed us in failing to report the confirmed discovery of military grade nano thermitic particles in dust samples provided by residents living near Ground Zero on 9/11.

I get the feeling this coordinated shunning of very important news about 9/11 is as bad as the attacks themselves.  The mere fact that the scientific breakthrough proving controlled demolition of the World Trade Center on 9/11 came from Denmark speaks volumes about the character of our own scientific community and security apparatus.

You, Mr. Attorney General, are bound by your solemn oath of office to investigate such  grave matters and I trust that you are doing so.  If you haven't been actively investigating 9/11, then I urge you to do so.  I even offer my help in conducting an effective investigation.

Let me remind you of the Internet links provided in my letter #11 which will enable you to hear and read about the University of Copenhagen breakthrough.  In the Danish TV presentation (with captioning in English) you will hear the lead scientist Niels Harrit.  Please note Harrit emphasizes that the nano-thermitic explosives do not explain all the observed phenomena of the collapsing Twin Towers and Salomon Brothers Building.  He does not name the phenomena which cannot be explained by the nano thermite, so let me brief you on this.

Only a channeled thermonuclear blast explains off-the-chart seismic spikes, burn wounds like those encountered at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a distinctive electrical fire smell hanging in the air for many weeks and even many miles upwind of Ground Zero, evaporated steel, dust particles of microscopic dimensions generated in mid-air and far removed from the localized damage sustained by the jet impacts and burning fuel.

People capable of these special effects comprise a small round-up, and the search should begin at institutions such as Sandia Laboratories, Applied Research Associates and Metatech, all with offices near Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque.

Access to the WTC and security there must be examined also.

See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder at http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html.

Stephen M. St. John

Back to Table of Contents

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #16 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
26 May 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Of course I am not holding my breath for you to reply to any of the previous 15 letters urging you to launch an investigation of 9/11.  It's a free country and there is no compulsion to reply.  But if you are not already involved in an investigation of 9/11, you are carving a legacy for the Obama Administration as possible accessory after the fact in a crime that may have been designed to fulfill an ideological impulse for military domination in the Middle East.

Your man in Public Affairs John Miller rests on his laurels for having interviewed Osama Bin Laden in May 1998, and fails to see the copious evidence indicating Bin Laden is dead and the videotapes of him are incompetent forgeries as documented by David Ray Griffin in his recently released book, Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive? (Northampton: Olive Branch [Interlink Books] 2009).

Miller is also unaware of the problems posed by lack of video surveillance evidence at the three airports of 9/11, and was evasive when confronted about this, which is hardly an encouraging sign.

Nearly two months after the announcement in Denmark that military grade nano-thermitic explosive residue was found in a set of dust samples taken from Ground Zero at the World Trade Center on 9/11, our government is still ignoring the scientists who made this discovery and their work.  This is not right!

New Yorkers are determined to fill the perceived void left by the Department of Justice and local authorities.  A group named the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (http://nyccan.org) is well on its way toward collection of enough citizen petitions (45,000) to place a referendum on the November 2009 New York City mayoral election ballot.

The referendum will ask voters to approve the creation of a full, fair and impartial 9/11 Investigation Commission to answer the hundreds of questions left unanswered by the original 9/11 Commission led by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton.

The proposed commission will follow all evidence wherever it leads.

This grassroots effort to examine our past so as to better understand the present and chart the future should inspire all of us.

Stephen M. St. John

Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey at: http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html

Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder at: http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html

Update October 2013:  Again, it must be pointed out that the 9/11 Dulles Airport surveillance video lacks a time stamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of hijackers in the main terminal that morning.  There is no 9/11 surveillance video evidence whatsoever from the other two airports at Newark and Boston.  So I say, there is no credible 9/11 surveillance video evidence.  Also, with respect to the death of Osama bin Laden, let me refer the reader to the late Benazir Bhutto's 5 November 2007 interview with the late David Frost in which she names "Omar Shaikh, the man who murdered Osama Bin Laden."  (My fax broadcast of 30 December 2007 gives a link to this interview, but it has somehow been very recently corrupted (http://www.show-the-house.com/id82.html)  Finally, the New York City November 2009 Mayoral Ballot Initiative for a new investigation of 9/11 failed.

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #17 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
10 June 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me resume consideration of remote control of the flights of 9/11.

Back on 10 June 2004 I posted on the Internet a brief article urging the 9/11 Commission to put under scrutiny Dov Zakheim and System Planning Corporation (SPC) of Alexandria, Virginia (http://www.sysplan.com), which designs, manufactures and distributes highly sophisticated technology that enables an operator to fly by remote control as many as eight different airborne vehicles at the same time from one position either on the ground or airborne. (http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/CTS)

Also, SPC makes and markets the technology to take over the controls of an aerial vehicle already in flight.  For example, the Flight Termination System technology can hijack hijackers and bring the plane down safely.  (http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/FTS)

The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with the CTS technology that can control up to eight airborne vehicles simultaneously.

The aerial vehicles' communications can likewise be co-opted.

Was 9/11 a computer crime?

The possibility of nefarious use of these absolutely brilliant and beneficial technologies developed and deployed by SPC during multiple NORAD exercises coincidental to the attacks on 9/11 certainly deserves careful consideration in any full and impartial investigation of what actually took place on 9/11.

The 9/11 Commission did not do this.

Will you see that this is done?

Were we infiltrated?

Dov Zakheim was CEO of SPC's International Division until President George W. Bush appointed him Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon.

When he was candidate Bush's foreign policy adviser in September 2000 he had signed a document suggesting that "a new Pearl Harbor" would expedite its recommendations for worldwide military domination.

Then, in February 2001, President Bush, according to Paul O'Neill, ordered that a way be found to go into Iraq.

On 10 September 2001 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon Comptroller lost $2.3 trillion.

Next day we were on our way to perpetual war in the Middle East.

Think about it!

The Mastermind behind 9/11?

See http://www.show-the-house.com/id86.html

Stephen M. St. John

Text of fax broadcast:
Open Letter #18 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
22 June 2009

Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me be clear that when I assert or otherwise imply that 9/11 was an "inside job," I do not mean to besmirch the reputations of the vast majority of loyal and law abiding Americans.

I'm talking about cliques and secret societies with ulterior motives pushing the envelope of their ideologies.

Listen yourself to JFK's warning at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnkdfFAqsHA.

So let me call a spade a spade concerning Michael Chertoff when he headed the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice.

Accuracy in Media's letter to Chertoff in 2002 -- as he investigated 9/11 -- challenges him on the virtual exclusion of over 200 eyewitnesses to a missile rising to meet and explode TWA Flight 800 on 17 July 1996.

This shows an established pattern to exclude or suppress evidence.

See http://www.aim.org/publications/aim_report/2002/postcards/05/chertoff.html.

So long before Satam As Suqami's pristine passport escaped the inferno at Ground Zero in New York, or the red bandana survived the total obliteration of Flight 93, or the thousands of airline part serial numbers -- engraved in heat resistant alloy steel -- escaped recovery, certain FBI officials were doing their monkey business to hide the true circumstances of the shootdown of TWA Flight 800.

Most shocking was their dismissive treatment of Linda Kabot's chance photo of what appears to be a cruise missile on its way toward Flight 800 minutes before the explosion.

They're still there!

Kabot's photo was published by Paris Match on 7 November 1996.  See TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On at http://www.show-the-house.com/id13.html.

9/11 and the TWA Flight 800 shootdown share some common elements.

Both involve remote controlled piloting of at least one aerial vehicle.

Both took place in the midst of military exercises.

Both triggered a rush to judgment that Arabs were to blame.

Both fit the profile of a false flag intelligence operation to provide a pretext for war.

The rule "Go massive" made 9/11 a success.

See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorneys General of the USA at:

http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html

and

http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html.

Stephen M. St. John

Update December 2013:  On the 17th anniversary of the downing of TWA Flight 800 EPIX TV showed an excellent documentary film by Kristina Borjesson which includes testimonies of former senior NTSB investigators and others who were directly involved in the TWA Flight 800 investigation.  You will see and hear allegations of cover-up and criminal tampering with evidence including the testimonies of 755 eyewitnesses as well as a complete repudiation of the NTSB report on the demise of TWA Flight 800.  EPIX TV is currently offering a generous 14 day free trial subscription which will enable anyone with an Internet connection to view all of its movies including this very, very important documentary film on TWA Flight 800.  Please visit http://www.epixhd.com/ and click the link at upper right for the free trial subscription.  And for more information about TWA Flight 800 visit http://flight800doc.com/.  Bear in mind that the same FBI officials and others who acted so shamefully in the so-called TWA Flight 800 "investigation" were also involved in the official lies, disinformation, stonewalling and control of information about 9/11.  And bear in mind that Borjesson had been dismissed from her job with CBS when she tried to expose the truth there as a responsible TV journalist.  Without a free press, we are not really free!

Back to Table of Contents

Credits

Cover photo credit http://flickr.com and http://www.flickr.com/photos/dennoit/4982584929/, which is Dennis Leung’s 2010 night panorama of Lower Manhattan, made available thanks to Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/, and from which the cover photo was cut and edited by ebook cover designer Rita Toews at http://yourebookcover.com.

Photo after letter #5 to Attorney General Mukasey courtesy of Richard A. Siegel http://www.ricksiegel.com & http://www.911raw.com, from whose video it was cut to show the smoking Twin Towers of the World Trade Center before they fell.

9/11 Seismic Recordings at letter #33 to Attorney General Mukasey:  credit Columbia University Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu and National Institute of Standards & Technology http://www.nist.gov; see https://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861611 and scroll down to page 662 [728 of 797 in NIST PFD file].

9/11 Seismic Recordings also at letter #33 to Attorney General Mukasey:  credit Columbia University Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu; see https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.html.

Photo after letter #53 to Attorney General Mukasey courtesy of Richard A. Siegel http://www.ricksiegel.com & http://www.911raw.com, from whose video it was cut to show the explosions inside the North Tower World Trade Center One which turned steel and concrete into a fine powder in mid-air.

Satellite photo at letter #3 to Attorney General Holder:  credit Google Earth/Europa Technologies and National Aeronautics & Space Administration http://nasa.gov and United States Geological Survey http://www.usgs.gov image which was edited by the author to show projected course of aerial vehicle had it passed through WTC2 instead of hitting it, and how such trajectory leads to where the author stood at that time next to the New York Regional Office of the United States Air Force.

Photo at letter #12 to Attorney General Holder of author's photo IDs used for US Government work with the US Department of Commerce, Survey Division of the US Bureau of the Census, in New York County and a few outlying areas.

Endnotes

There are no endnotes.  Let me recommend to the reader a Google search with key words to track down items of interest.

About the Author

I am retired and live in the heart of Silicon Valley, San José, California.  My old aspirations can be gleaned in my résumés at http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html.

Contact

I will be happy to entertain any decently expressed comments.  Any and all errors in my ebook are my own, and if you can find and correct any of them, I shall be grateful to hear from you by telephone at 408 658 4717, or by regular United States Postal Service mail to Stephen M. St. John, Post Office Box 720274, San José, CA 95172, or by emails to both stephen@show-the-house.com & stephen.m.st.john@gmail.com. Items sent by FedEx, UPS, and other delivery services should be addressed to:  Stephen M. St. John, Colonnade 720274, 200 South Third Street, San José CA 95112.

* * * * * * *