|
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER
#1 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
4 February 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Congratulations
on your new and very important role as our nation's Attorney General. I wish you success in all your endeavors at the
US Department of Justice.
President Obama has promised change, and there is no part of our government which needs
change more than the Department of Justice. Wrongdoing that is ignored and goes unpunished sets a very bad example and
undermines confidence in our public institutions.
And no greater example of wrongdoing is the cover-up of the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth with respect to 9/11. I ask that you look into this matter and give it your highest
priority. I offer my help.
In October of 2001, not long after 9/11, the Taliban offered to deliver Osama
Bin Laden to the US Government upon receipt of good prima facie evidence showing he and his group were the real perpetrators.
Bush treated this offer with contempt, and you know the rest.
Do we really need more troops in Afghanistan when 9/11
evidence would have and could have done just fine?
I firmly believe we must go back to that fork in the road where we took the
wrong turn and start over again.
The recently deceased Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (requiescat in pace!) convened a private symposium of military and commercial aviation professionals from 16
to 19 September 2001 and reported the group's unanimous conclusion to the Joint Chiefs of Staff: the aerial vehicles
could not have been flown by flight students on their maiden voyages in big jets.
Rather, such daredevil aerial
acrobatics as evinced by the aircraft that hit the Pentagon and WTC2 could only have been done by remote control.
From day one,
certain people knew these flights were beyond the capabilities of even seasoned pilots. But rather than eliciting their
testimonies and analyzes, we have drifted along in a conspiracy of silence with devastating consequences for millions of innocent
people.
This
is just the tip of the iceberg.
We need to go back!
I urge you to conduct a real investigation of 9/11.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General Mukasey.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id70.html for Donn de Grand Pré interview and obituary.
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York City, New York 10185 (Please
note that the contact information above, as well as the phone numbers 212 534 5024 and 917 519 2905 and the
email address metatron.metatron@verizon.net, are no longer current and have
been deleted from all other letters in this series.)
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/ ************************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #2 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
12 February 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
I write again in the hope that I will prevail upon you to reopen the investigation of 9/11 so that better understanding
of our past will illuminate our present condition and the steps we still need to take.
In my previous letter I
explained how the late Colonel Donn de Grand Pré established remote control as the only possible explanation for the
highly unusual flight paths of at least two of the four flights of 9/11. De Grand Pré did this within a week
of 9/11, yet the expert testimonies that he gathered were ignored and suppressed in favor of the illogical official conspiracy
theory.
But there are other equally compelling reasons to commence a real investigation of 9/11.
For
example, cell and air phone calls early on became central to the news media accounts of hijackings on board the jets.
These news media accounts were later adopted by the 9/11 Commission as an essential part of the official story. But
such cell and air phone calls were impossible to make!
A Canadian university mathematics professor, A. Kee Dewdney
(http://physics911.net), conducted his own experiments and found that cell phone calls are virtually impossible from very high altitude or at a
jet's cruising speed. My own inquiries, including a USAF Public Affairs officer, confirm the technical impossibility
of making cell phone calls from jets at cruising altitudes or speeds. Furthermore, a researcher for Pilots for 9/11
Truth (http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org) contacted American Airlines and obtained confirmation that its 757s do not have air phones.
So you see, there
are very significant problems with the official story.
Strong indications of remote control piloting and bogus
air and cell phone calls combine to raise red flags indicating the need for a new investigation.
Again, I urge
you to conduct such a new investigation. This is your jurisdiction.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html for 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to Attorney General Mukasey.
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ *************************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #3 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
19 February 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me pick up the thread of my argument for a new investigation of 9/11, where I
mentioned strong indications of remote control piloting and bogus air and cell phone calls as main components of a conspiracy.
My colleague at the US Department of Commerce saw the jet over New York harbor as it homed in on the south tower
WTC2. He was astounded to see one wing pointing straight up to the sky and the other straight down to the water before
leveling off and reaching Manhattan. Other eyewitnesses, including personnel in the Newark Airport control tower, witnessed
this highly unusual attitude of a large jet banking hard left at very high speed.
The jet's unerring descending
arc of flight into its target created G forces that would have rendered even a seasoned pilot incapable of the maneuver, let
alone a flight student on his maiden voyage. So you see, the story of Arab hijackers is not the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth.  CNN photo at right shows
aerial vehicle heading for the south tower of the World Trade Center, WTC2. The southwest to northeast trajectory of
the attacking jet is clearly seen against the north faces of the Twin Towers, which run at right angles to Broadway, Church
Street and West Broadway. And just like the jet that hit the Pentagon, this jet was actually homing in on a building
where there was also an office of the United States Air Force. (See aerial photo below.) What a marvelous coincidence!
After our US Department of Commerce office on the 37th floor of 26
Federal Plaza had been evacuated shortly after the hit on WTC2, I arrived and briefly viewed the burning Twin Towers from
the southwest corner office. A little more than 100 feet away, on the same floor at the southeast corner of the building,
is the New York Regional Office of the US Air Force. In hindsight, I see that the jet that hit WTC2 was heading right
for this USAF office, but was lined up to hit the south tower first. This, in black and white on this page, is the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth!  Photo at right from Google
Earth/Europa Technologies (NASA/USGS image) is edited to show projected southwest to northeast flight path of aerial vehicle
had it passed through WTC2 instead of hitting it. The jet, alleged to be United Airlines Flight 175, was headed right
for the New York Regional Office of the United States Air Force on the 37th floor of the Federal Building at 26 Federal Plaza
at Broadway and Duane Street. (I was there at that time.) The only other 9/11 jet showing an unerring high speed
descending arc of flight was the one that hit the Pentagon, where there are, of course, many other offices of the United
States Air Force. The surreptitious placement of directional antennas in objects as innocent as picture frames so as
to facilitate remote control piloting for the purpose of sabotage still needs to be ruled out.
My own observations, and those of my colleague and other competent eyewitnesses, corroborate
the independent findings of the late Colonel Donn de Grand Pré's group, that the attacking jets of 9/11 could only
have been flown by remote control. These findings, which were put into the hands of members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
within weeks of 9/11, were not considered at all by the 9/11 Commission.
Instead, the 9/11 Commission ratified
news media accounts of the events which depend on bogus air and cell phone calls.
The need for a real investigation
of 9/11 is quite clear.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey.
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ ************************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #4 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER 26
February 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me please
continue with my exposition on the need for a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.
In previous letters
I have dwelt on stong indications that remote control piloting was involved in at least two of the four flights and that the
government's official story rests on bogus air and cell phone calls. Just these two elements warrant renewed investigation.
Now consider the suspicious lack of video surveillance images at the three airports of 9/11.
As I stood
watching the immediate aftermath of the attacks on the World Trade Center from the southwest corner of the Federal Building
on the 37th floor (about 100 feet away from the New York office of the US Air Force in the southeast corner where that jet
was headed as it hit its target WTC2), right next to me was the office of my boss, Marion Britton. She was on Flight
93 rising out of Newark at that very moment. I know I never saw Marion again, but for reasons explained here as well
as in future letters, I simply can no longer believe the "Let's roll" scenario and all the rest.
At
first I wondered why I was never shown -- and never found -- any video surveillance images of Marion at Newark Airport.
Gradually I came to realize we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone
hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11. How can this be explained? Why am I still asking for
an explanation seven years after the attacks?
And not only have we not had any explanation for the mysterious
lack of routine video surveillance evidence from the airports, we as a nation have been badly fooled by endless TV broadcast
images of two suspects passing a metal detector at Portland, Maine International Airport.
So we have misdirection
on top of curious omission.
To recapitulate: No videos! Bogus air and cell phone calls! Flight
paths that can only be explained by remote control technology!
It is time to abandon the "19 Arab hijackers"
conspiracy theory and conduct a real investigation. Let's begin!
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read 60 Open Letters on 9/11 to former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey.
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ UPDATE September 2013:
The surveillance video from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless as evidence
of hijackers passing through the Main Terminal on the morning of 11 September 2001. On top of that we have NEVER seen
ANY surveillance video evidence whatsoever from Newark Liberty and Boston Logan International Airports. And so I repeat:
we have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the
three airports involved in 9/11. How can this be explained? Why am I still asking for an explanation twelve
years after the attacks? As for Flight 93, a German researcher named "Woody Box" has presented intriguing
possibilities regarding the truth of what really happened, including a safe landing at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport!
Google his name for more. ************************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #5 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
3 MARCH 2009
Dear
Mr. Attorney General,
If patently bogus cell and air phone calls, and obvious lack of routine airport video surveillance
evidence, plus sure indications of remote control piloting of at least two of the four aerial vehicles used in the attacks
of 9/11, still do not convince you that a real investigation is in order, let me please press on with my expostulation.
Take for example American Airlines Flight 11, which allegedly opened the attacks when it struck the north tower WTC1.
This surprise attack was filmed by the Naudet brothers at Lispenard and Church Streets, three quarters of a mile to the North
Northeast of WTC1. Researchers have noted three trucks parked side by side, which gave a protective area in the street
for the cameraman, who swung the camera to focus on the point of impact just ahead of the jet. Perhaps this was just
luck, but there are those, myself included, who wonder and would like to probe to know more.
I viewed an original
copy of the Naudet brothers' film after it was passed to officials in the Fire Department of New York. For me, the bottom
line is, I see no engine pods under the wings, which, if the jet was correctly described as a 767, should be clearly visible
from three quarters of a mile away. (Three quarters of a mile is the distance, say, between the UN campus and the opposite
shore of the East River.) So you see, with no engine pods, I find the official story is preposterous.
Even
though the Naudet brothers' film is the only known video of the first attack, and was not broadcast until the next day, President
George W. Bush twice said he saw the impact of the first jet live on a TV screen before entering the classroom where, minutes
later, Andrew Card brought news of the second attack. These strange utterances by Bush need investigation. And
if there is equality under the law, Bush and his cronies should be under oath when deposed by a new 9/11 investigatory commission.
I'd like to ask George if he noticed engine pods under the wings.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html and read letter #1 to AG Mukasey with links to White House transcripts of George W. Bush's bizarre claims that he saw the
first jet hit on 9/11.
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ Update September 2013: It should be pointed out again for emphasis that the engine pods of a Boeing
767 jet are humongous and hard to miss from less than a mile away. I don't see engine pods on that aerial vehicle filmed
by the Naudet brothers as it crashed into the north Twin Tower, WTC1! *********************************************************************************************************************** Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #6 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
12 MARCH 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney
General,
In my previous five letters I have stated the case for remote control of the attacking aerial vehicles on 9/11,
bogus air and cell phone calls from alleged passengers on these aircraft, and total lack of credible video surveillance images
of any of the passengers or alleged hijackers at the three major, high security airports from which the flights of 9/11 are
alleged to have departed.
I repeat that these circumstances present at the very least strong prima facie evidence of a false flag intelligence operation and fully integrated coverup. And I also
repeat that the questions raised warrant a new investigation, which you can create, and I ask you to do so.
The
recent Associated Press reports of confessions by tortured inmates of Guantanamo are propaganda at its worst. These
"confessed" masterminds of 9/11 cannot possibly explain remote control piloting, bogus cell and air phone calls
and routine airport video surveillance evidence gone missing. We have to look elsewhere.
And even though
President Obama expressed a desire not to look back, but to go forward, I submit to you that the crimes of 9/11 were simply
too great in magnitude to overlook, and that only a real investigation will allow proper confrontation of our past to illuminate
our future and proper measures to be taken.
You know how difficult it is to grapple with a mindset conducive
to lynchings. This is the task: to confront a high tech lynching of Arabs.
When you consider the
substandard response of NORAD during aerial wargames being conducted at precisely the same time as the 9/11 attacks, you must
take into account the likelihood of infiltraton of computer sytems for the purposes of intervention and sabotage. This,
I believe, is how the aerial attacks of 9/11 were carried out.
Investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn (http://www.bollyn.com/) has led us to a Massachusetts computer software company named Ptech, which in the years and months leading up to 9/11 was
positioned to place into US Government computer systems software that allowed such infiltration for purposes of intervention
and sabotage.
Shall we check Ptech out?
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html for Open Letters on 9/11 to US Attorney General Eric Holder. (#3 has been augmented with two photos showing jet homing
in on USAF office in New York.)
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ ***********************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #7 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
16 March 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Don't you agree that 9/11 truth will kill the beast?
Don't you agree that without the truth, there can be no justice? And without justice there can be no peace?
So how can you be contentedly passive with respect to routine airport surveillance videos gone missing?
Or to high tech voice impersonations by cell and airphone?
Or to obvious indications of remote control piloting?
Don't you want to sift through the software company Ptech and find out how our command, control and communications
were very likely compromised on 9/11 and by whom?
Remember that unjustified, immoral and illegal invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq began at the airport gates of 9/11, and that there is not a scintilla of credible evidence that the alleged
hijackers were even at these airports or on these planes. The 9/11 Commission essentially ratified dubious news reports
which virtually convicted Osama bin Laden before the Twin Towers fell.
Though 9/11 was basically a computer crime,
the targets also reveal even more evidence of fraud and force.
At ground zero in New York we have evidence not
only of military grade aluminum powdered incendiaries, but of even greater high energy explosives that registered off-the-chart
spikes on Columbia University's seismograph, that evaporated heat resistent alloyed steel, that left pools of molten metal
for weeks after the attacks, that laterally displaced steel beams weighing tons at distances equal to the lengths of two football
fields, that pulverized concrete into particles of microscopic dimensions and that caused burn wounds similar to those encountered
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Here on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, I and many others remember the distinctive
smell of an electrical fire which hanged in the air for weeks after 9/11 even though we were 7 miles upwind of Ground Zero.
Such smell is a characteristic of a nuclear detonation.
All of these facts have been confirmed but have been
studiously avoided by official investigations and the news media.
Will you be our 9/11 Truth Champion?
You have jurisdiction.
The time to act is now.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html to read this letter and all previous open letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder.
Stephen
M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ ************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #8
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER 22 March 2009 Dear Mr. Attorney
General, With joy and great anticipation I share with
you and the international community in Washington and here in New York City, every member of the US Congress, House and Senate,
as well as other organizations and individuals, public and private, advance notice of an upcoming 9/11 moment of truth.
If all goes according to plan, your own Assistant FBI Director for Public Affairs, John Miller, will be a guest
on James Zogby's Viewpoint this Thursday at 6PM EDT.
Zogby heads the Arab American Institute (http://www.aaiusa.org), which he founded shortly after the assassination of our dear friend and colleague Alex Odeh in the 1985 bombing of an American
Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee office near Los Angeles.
Miller has been at the nexus of show biz and crime
reporting for decades, and is perhaps best known for his interview with Osama Bin Laden in 1998, which laid the foundation
for the background stories and innuendo leading to Bin Laden's virtual conviction before the smoking Twin Towers finally collapsed.
Nearly eight years after 9/11, Zogby may very well reverse Bin Laden's queered chances of a fair trial.
Zogby will have the opportunity to ask Miller this four part question:
(1) Now, after more
than seven full years, we have still not seen ANY credible video surveillance evidence of ANY of the passengers, let alone
hijackers, at ANY of the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed. How can this be explained?
(2) Each airport had the highest "Category X" security rating. So how could ALL
three airports fail to produce ANY routine video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers exactly simultaneously?
(3) And isn't it a little suspicious that we were shown two suspects passing through a metal detector
at Portland Maine International Airport over and over again ad infinitum? Many
people to this day think these images were from Logan airport in Boston.
(4) As disturbing
as all of this is to me -- and this is just the tip of the iceberg with regard to 9/11 -- what is worse is the FBI's
seemingly total lack of curiosity and stonewalling of those who ask questions. Will we see real change at the FBI in
this regard?
Show us and the Taliban the proof!
Visit http://www.aaiusa.org/dr-zogby/38/viewpoint for details of Dr. Zogby's interview with the FBI's John Miller at 6PM EDT this Thursday 26 March 2009.
Stephen
M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com/ Update 2013: To
clarify, the video surveillance tape from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless
as evidence of alleged hijackers there on the morning of 11 September 2013. We have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance
images of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11. ************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #9
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
2 April 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
April Fools' Day has left us unscathed, and I thank the Almighty and Eternally Vigilant Creator of this world and all other
worlds.
The price of Liberty is our own vigilance, and we all can and must make a contribution toward this end.
So I persist in my endeavor to get to the bottom of the missing, routine video surveillance tapes of passengers and hijackers
at the three airports from which the flights of 9/11 are said to have departed.
This issue, together with irrefutable
evidence of bogus cell and air phone calls from these flights, as well as of piloting by remote control, indicates the need
for a full, fair and impartial investigation of 9/11.
Last week my anticipated opportunity to question your FBI's
Assistant Director for Public Affairs, John Miller, who was a guest on James Zogby's TV program Viewpoint, was rudely terminated
before I could utter a full sentence. Zogby and Miller did a hit and run by quickly stating they had seen 9/11 airport
video evidence.
This prompted me to contact a few of my former colleagues at the US Department of Commerce, who
unanimously confirmed they had never seen video surveillance evidence of our Assistant Regional Director Marion Britton, who
we were told was on United Airlines Flight 93 which crashed in Pennsylvania. They all told me the only video evidence
they had seen was of Mohammad Atta and a companion passing through a metal detector. Like most Americans, they erroneously
believed these images came from Logan International Airport in Boston, when in fact they came from Portland Maine International
Airport. A fair jury would relish the distinction.
These considerations of truth and justice impinge on
our sovereignty. Missing in our deliberations on Afghanistan and Iraq is a fair answer to the Taliban's reasonable request
to former President George W. Bush: "Show us the evidence and we will deliver Osama Bin Laden."
Though the invasions and occupations of both countries began, in effect, at these airport gates, we have yet to show accountability
to the Taliban or even the American people.
The best way out of Afghanistan and Iraq is to find out how we arrived
there in the first place.
We need a real investigation of 9/11.
Where there is no vision, the people
perish.
Proverbs of Solomon 29:18
Stephen M. St. John
website http://www.show-the-house.com/ Update September 2013: According to Wikipedia, John Miller is the god-child of
the wife of Mafioso capo Frank Costello, whose friends included FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and Miller's father, who was
a journalist. It is noteworthy how crime and news & entertainment tend to stay in the family. After 9/11
and the resultant invasion, the opium production in Afghanistan, which the Taliban had nearly eradicated, increased.
************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #10 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
8 April 2009 Dear Mr. Attorney General,
The FBI's Assistant Director for Public Affairs, John Miller,
is a superficial ninny and celebrity toady who likes big cigars and limousine arrivals more than hard, cold facts about missing
video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers at the airports of 9/11. He also lacks the manly virtue to return
my call and hear the unpleasant truth, and this I find insulting not only to me but also to my former colleagues at the US
Department of Commerce who back my assertion that we have never seen routine video surveillance evidence of our Assistant
Regional Director Marion Britton at Newark Airport before she boarded United Airlines Flight 93. They only know of the
Portland Maine International Airport tape of Mohammad Atta and companion, which they, like millions if not billions of others,
were tricked into believing was filmed in Boston.
I pinpoint the lack integrity at the FBI which extends to many
other crucial points in the cover-up related to the events of 9/11. When a BIG LIE is so interwoven into the core components
of our government, our sovereignty is compromised. This explains the idiotic statement of Ambassador Richard Holbrooke,
"We need to make sure we know what the appeal of the Taliban is." Well, the cause of the Taliban is just,
and the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan are not. The Taliban said to Bush, "Show us the evidence that Osama
Bin Laden perpetrated the attacks of 9/11, and we will deliver him to you."
The USA cannot play straight with
its own people, let alone the Taliban.
The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq began, in effect, at the airport gates
of 9/11, and here we must consider the Dutch company ICTS-International which controlled security at Logan. With a single
exception, its board of directors consists of nationals of the Jewish state who have military intelligence backgrounds.
A Co-Chairman has a history of corruption leading to the Prime Minister's office, whose present occupant is a psychopath who
more than once said that 9/11 was "good for Israel."
Indeed, 9/11 fulfilled the Zionist wish to put American
muscle on Mesopotamian patrol. Stephen M. St. John Update 2013: To clarify, the video
surveillance tape from Washington Dulles International Airport lacks a timestamp and is therefore worthless as evidence of
alleged hijackers there on the morning of 11 September 2013. We have NEVER seen ANY credible video surveillance images
of ANY of the passengers -- let alone hijackers -- at ANY of the three airports involved in 9/11. Also, according to
Wikipedia, John Miller is the god-child of the wife of Mafioso capo Frank Costello, whose friends included FBI Director J.
Edgar Hoover and Miller's father, who was a journalist. It is noteworthy how crime and news & entertainment tend
to stay in the family. After 9/11 and the resultant invasion, the opium production in Afghanistan, which the Taliban
had nearly eradicated, increased. ************************************************************************************************************************ Text of fax
broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #11 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
14 April 2009
Dear
Mr. Attorney General,
The 6 April 2009 news out of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark
reminded me of what New York's 1999 Nobel Laureate in Medicine at Rockefeller University, Günter Blobel, once said:
"If you cannot explain it to your grandmother, it is not good science."
Blobel remembers from his childhood
seeing the civilian target, Dresden, burn so bright you could read a newspaper at night; 64 years later, discovery of active
thermitic material in dust samples taken by local residents from ground zero of the World Trade Center confirms what journalists
fear to write: 9/11 was an inside job.
Listen to lead scientist and co-author of this groundbreaking
report at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
or at
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Freedom.htm?EdNo=001&At=048645
and read the report at
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM.
An episode of the TV comedy series Get Smart produced during construction of the World Trade Center has suggested
to some researchers that explosives were mixed into the building materials as a precaution against unforeseen circumstances
that would require emergency demolition. Be that as it may, this University of Copenhagen paper by Harrit, Farrer, Jones,
Ryan, Legge, Farnsworth, Roberts, Gourley and Larsen shows a much more advanced military grade of nano-thermitic material
from the debris of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center than what was available in the late 1960s.
Above
all, these brave scientists demonstrate the need for a new investigation, one that will ask the right questions, including,
who placed these advanced aluminum nano-powdered incendiaries into WTC 1, 2 & 7?
And to recapitulate from
previous letters, the unexplained lack of video surveillance evidence of passengers or hijackers at Logan, Liberty and Dulles
airports on 9/11, together with bogus cell and air phone calls and strong indications of remote control piloting of at least
two if not all four of the flights of 9/11, constitute good grounds for a new investigation.
Dark shadows of
doubt cover the official conspiracy theory from beginning to end, from airports to targets. Stephen M. St. John
************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Evidence
of censorship on the Internet with respect to 9/11? You decide! Read this delivery failure notification from Verizon:
This
report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <5837B863127E464BBC9831D787898468@MetatronPC>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:37:41 -0500
From: "Stephen
M. St. John" <metatron.metatron@verizon.net>
To: "Dr. Niels H. Harrit" <harrit@nano.ku.dk>
Subject: Open Letter #11 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: harrit@nano.ku.dk
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp;554 5.7.1 <vms173003pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.3]>:
Client host rejected: Access denied
Remote system:
dns;mail.fys.ku.dk (TCP|206.46.173.3|46437|130.225.102.43|25) (mail.fys.ku.dk ESMTP Postfix)
Does the truth
about 9/11 ignite fear in the minds of the real terrorists?
**************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #12 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
23 April 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney
General,
Let me reiterate that once we get past the state of denial about bogus cell and air phone calls, routine airport
surveillance videos gone missing and indications of remote control piloting, we can start asking the necessary questions to
solve the unsolved crime of 9/11.
 As a former US Department of Commerce employee who worked under Marion Britton, who, I've been told, was on United Airlines
Flight 93, let me comment on the various published reports that she "phoned a longtime friend, Fred Fiumano ... sometime
after 9:30."
Bearing in mind that cell phone calls are technically impossible from jets in flight, and that
the organization Pilots for 9/11 Truth was apprised by American Airlines that 757 jets were not equipped with seat-back air
phones, I also note the implausibility of the falsely constructed story itself.
Mr. Fiumano very likely received
a call from someone impersonating Marion with a high tech software known as real time digital voice morphing.
Moreover, Marion failed to follow procedure to call the office whenever a problem would arise, which is strange indeed because
Marion knew and taught the drill, and practiced what she preached.
The office was evacuated by 9:10 AM (I was
the last one out) and nobody was there to take her call, but she could have and would have left a recorded message.
However, key personnel told me there was no recorded message.
Equally weird are reports that Marion used a borrowed
cell phone because hers was not working. Marion always carried a cell phone issued to her by the US Department of Commerce.
If she had a problem with it, she could have easily replaced it when she was in the office the previous day.
What does all of this mean?
The evildoers had inside knowledge of our office procedures.
They had
to omit Marion's government issued Motorola from their narrative because such a call could be traced.
They also
knew the office would be evacuated by the time the impersonation was to be made.
And even if such a normally
expected call to the office was actually made, confidentiality laws would have long delayed the emotional contents from the
news media.
The evildoers wanted another story to back the bogus call between the Olsons.
See http://pilotsfor911truth.org/amrarticle.html.
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html and read past Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder.
Stephen M. St. John ************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #13
ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
30 April 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
What
a week!
 First Air Force One and an F-16 fighter jet flying in tandem make a startling visit over New York harbor so reminiscent of
the jet that hit the south Twin Tower WTC2 on 9/11 as to start a panic.
Then, in a blow to US foreign policy
in the Middle East, four Lebanese generals falsely accused of the Hariri assassination are freed by the special tribunal in
the Hague after more than three years in prison without ever being charged.
See http://www.1010wins.com/Photos-Video--Recriminations-after-Jet-Flyover-Pho/4286293.
Let's hope President Obama can scrape this Texas justice dog do off his shoe and begin anew.
 The Bush Administration was first to point its finger at the "evildoers" who supposedly killed Hariri, and now we
finally find out the evidence isn't even sufficient to detain the generals. Germany had vaulted into the curious 5 +
1 configuration in the Security Council as part of Bush's carrot and stick approach and was on its sovereign knees by overturning
court decisions in the Motassadeq case. In its darkest hour, Germany allowed secret substitute testimony from a US Attorney.
And now we hear the feckless German Detlev Mehlis, who caused the generals' imprisonment, make excuses.
See http://www.almustaqbal.org/news_details.php?id=NDA4Mjk=&t=29.
The USA lacks integrity abroad. And a dismal situation persists at home, where the New York City Police
Department, apprised of Air Force One's flyby in advance, did not advise the public or even the mayor.
But maybe
there was a compelling reason to limit advance notice?
Was the USAF testing my theory, stated in letter #3, that
the aerial vehicle that flew over the harbor into WTC2 was flying by remote control and homing in on the US Air Force office
in the Federal Building at Broadway and Duane Street?
Letter #3, dated 19 February 2009, was followed by Admiral
Mike Mullen's 2 April visit to lower Manhattan, not long before the 27 April flyby.
With the right equipment
aboard, this Air Force One jet may very well have been conducting experiments and data collection to explain the 595 mph unerring
descending arc flown by the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower.
Please consider this to be informed speculation
by a material witness who's been ignored thus far.
See http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html and scroll to letter #3 which includes a photo of approaching jet and Google Earth map showing how its trajectory was toward
the USAF NY Regional Office.
Stephen M. St. John ***********************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #14 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
7 May 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Now that you are "in like Flynn" at the head of the Department of Justice, it
appears to me that one of your major obstacles to a real investigation of 9/11 is former White House Counsel Jack Quinn, whose
manipulations were decisive in obtaining the outrageous pardon of our Zionist Buddy Mark Rich.
Recalling Zionist
Buddy Bibi Netanyahu's repeated statements that 9/11 was "good for Israel," and noting the logical inference that
Netanyahu believes 9/11 to have been worth it, I draw your attention to an interesting correlation between the Washington
public affairs firm Quinn Gillespie & Associates LLC and several corporate entities all with interests in propping up
the discredited 9/11 Commission Report.
Quinn Gillespie has given strategic insight and counsel in government
relations to General Electric's NBC Universal, the Screen Actors Guild, and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association,
all of whom combined to produce the movie "Flight 93." How ironic it was to see actors and actresses portray
the passengers and alleged hijackers even though none appeared on video surveillance cameras at Newark's Liberty International
Airport! This film is Zionist propaganda ad nauseam.
Other Quinn Gillespie clients have included
at least two with glaring conflicts of interest. The Silverstein Group, led by Lucky Zionist Buddy Larry Silverstein,
and Zurich Financial Services Corporation, one of the insurance companies locked in litigation when Silverstein cashed in
on his 49 day old insurance premium for the World Trade Center, both assiduously avoided copious evidence of controlled demolition
lest it block the desired outcome.
An unnamed "confidential" (pre-September 2008) Fortune 100 financial
services corporation no doubt had a part to play too.
Quinn Gillespie's clients clearly mark exactly where the
legal discovery process ends and the cover-up flourishes with respect to 9/11.
Their strategic insight and counsel
perpetuate the BIG LIE and a national nightmare in the interests of their own bottom line and, yes Bibi, the Zionist state.
Quinn Gillespie & Associates at the Epicenter of the 9/11 Cover-up?
Visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html and scroll to 10 July 2006 (Best viewed with Internet Explorer).
Stephen M. St. John Update
January 2014: Jack Quinn now serves alongside John Ashcroft among others on the Board of Directors of Academi, which
was previously known as Xe and before that as the infamous Blackwater. These war profiteers still continue to gain lucrative
government contracts for their "elite training and trusted protection" while very tellingly displaying the constellation
Ursa Major, or the Big Dipper, on their logo, which appears on a coin that is sold on their website's "proshop."
Perhaps showing loss of confidence, their tee-shirt displaying the cross of the crusading Knights Templar is no longer available
there. *******************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #15 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
14 May 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Our newsmedia has once again disappointed us in failing to report
the confirmed discovery of military grade nano thermitic particles in dust samples provided by residents living near Ground
Zero on 9/11.
I get the feeling this coordinated shunning of very important news about 9/11 is as bad as the
attacks themselves. The mere fact that the scientific breakthrough proving controlled demolition of the World Trade
Center on 9/11 came from Denmark speaks volumes about the character of our own scientific community and security apparatus.
You, Mr. Attorney General, are bound by your solemn oath of office to investigate such grave matters and I
trust that you are doing so. If you haven't been actively investigating 9/11, then I urge you to do so. I even
offer my help in conducting an effective investigation.
Let me remind you of the Internet links provided in my
letter #11 which will enable you to hear and read about the University of Copenhagen breakthrough. In the Danish TV
presentation (with captioning in English) you will hear the lead scientist Niels Harrit. Please note Harrit emphasizes
that the nano-thermitic explosives do not explain all the observed phenomena of the collapsing Twin Towers and Salomon Brothers
Building. He does not name the phenomena which cannot be explained by the nano thermite, so let me brief you on this.
Only a channeled thermonuclear blast explains off-the-chart seismic spikes, burn wounds like those encountered at
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a distinctive electrical fire smell hanging in the air for many weeks and even many miles upwind of
Ground Zero, evaporated steel, dust particles of microscopic dimensions generated in mid-air and far removed from the localized
damage sustained by the jet impacts and burning fuel.
People capable of these special effects comprise a small
round-up, and the search should begin at institutions such as Sandia Laboratories, Applied Research Associates and Metatech,
all with offices near Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque.
Access to the WTC and security there must be examined also.
See Open Letters on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Eric Holder at http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html.
Stephen M. St. John *******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #16 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER
26 May 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Of course I am not holding my breath for you to reply to any
of the previous 15 letters urging you to launch an investigation of 9/11. It's a free country and there is no compulsion
to reply. But if you are not already involved in an investigation of 9/11, you are carving a legacy for the Obama Administration
as possible accessory after the fact in a crime that may have been designed to fulfill an ideological impulse for military
domination in the Middle East.
Your man in Public Affairs John Miller rests on his laurels for having interviewed
Osama Bin Laden in May 1998, and fails to see the copious evidence indicating Bin Laden is dead and the videotapes of him
are incompetent forgeries as documented by David Ray Griffin in his recently released book, Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive?
(Northampton: Olive Branch [Interlink Books] 2009).
Miller is also unaware of the problems posed by lack of video
surveillance evidence at the three airports of 9/11, and was evasive when confronted about this, which is hardly an encouraging
sign.
Nearly two months after the announcement in Denmark that military grade nano-thermitic explosive residue
was found in a set of dust samples taken from Ground Zero at the World Trade Center on 9/11, our government is still ignoring
the scientists who made this discovery and their work. This is not right!
New Yorkers are determined to
fill the perceived void left by the Department of Justice and local authorities. A group named the New York City Coalition
for Accountability Now (http://nyccan.org) is well on its way toward collection of enough citizen petitions (45,000) to place a referendum on the November 2009 New
York City mayoral election ballot.
The referendum will ask voters to approve the creation of a full, fair and
impartial 9/11 Investigation Commission to answer the hundreds of questions left unanswered by the original 9/11 Commission
led by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton.
The proposed commission will follow all evidence wherever it leads.
This grassroots effort to examine our past so as to better understand the present and chart the future should inspire
all of us. Stephen
M. St. John Update
October 2013: Again, it must be pointed out that the 9/11 Dulles Airport surveillance video lacks a time stamp and is
therefore worthless as evidence of hijackers in the main terminal that morning. There is no 9/11 surveillance video
evidence whatsoever from the other two airports at Newark and Boston. So I say, there is no credible 9/11 surveilance
video evidence. Also, with respect to the death of Osama bin Laden, let me refer the reader to the late Benazir Bhutto's
5 November 2007 interview with the late David Frost in which she names "Omar Shaikh, the man who murdered Osama Bin Laden."
(My fax broadcast of 30 December 2007 gives a link to this interview, but it has somehow been very recently corrupted (http://www.show-the-house.com/id82.html) Finally, the New York City November 2009 Mayoral Ballot Initiative for a new investigation of
9/11 failed. ****************************************************************************************************************** Text
of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #17 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF THE USA ERIC HOLDER 10 June 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me resume consideration of remote control of the flights
of 9/11.
Back on 10 June 2004 I posted on the Internet a brief article urging the 9/11 Commission to put under
scrutiny Dov Zakheim and System Planning Corporation (SPC) of Alexandria, Virginia (http://www.sysplan.com), which designs, manufactures and distributes highly sophisticated technology that enables an operator to fly by remote control
as many as eight different airborne vehicles at the same time from one position either on the ground or airborne. (http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/CTS)
Also, SPC makes and markets the technology to take over the controls of an aerial vehicle already in flight.
For example, the Flight Termination System technology can hijack hijackers and bring the plane down safely. (http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/FTS)
The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with the CTS technology that can control up to eight
airborne vehicles simultaneously.
The
aerial vehicles' communications can likewise be co-opted.
Was 9/11 a computer crime?
The possibility
of nefarious use of these absolutely brilliant and beneficial technologies developed and deployed by SPC during multiple NORAD
exercises coincidental to the attacks on 9/11 certainly deserves careful consideration in any full and impartial investigation
of what actually took place on 9/11.
The 9/11 Commission did not do this.
Will you see that this
is done?
Were we infiltrated?
Dov Zakheim was CEO of SPC's International Division until President
George W. Bush appointed him Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon.
When he was candidate
Bush's foreign policy adviser in September 2000 he had signed a document suggesting that "a new Pearl Harbor" would
expedite its recommendations for worldwide military domination.
Then, in February 2001, President Bush, according
to Paul O'Neill, ordered that a way be found to go into Iraq.
On 10 September 2001 Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon Comptroller lost $2.3 trillion.
Next day we were on our way to perpetual
war in the Middle East.
Think about it!
The Mastermind behind 9/11?
See http://www.show-the-house.com/id86.html
Stephen M. St. John ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Text
of fax broadcast: OPEN LETTER #18 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE USA ERIC HOLDER
22 JUNE 2009
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
Let me be clear that when I assert or otherwise
imply that 9/11 was an "inside job," I do not mean to besmirch the reputations of the vast majority of loyal and
law abiding Americans.
I'm talking about cliques and secret societies with ulterior motives pushing the envelope
of their ideologies.
Listen yourself to JFK's warning at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnkdfFAqsHA.
So let me call a spade a spade concerning Michael Chertoff when he headed the Criminal Division of the Department
of Justice.
Accuracy in Media's letter to Chertoff in 2002 -- as he investigated 9/11 -- challenges him on the
virtual exclusion of over 200 eyewitnesses to a missile rising to meet and explode TWA Flight 800 on 17 July 1996.
This shows an established pattern to exclude or suppress evidence.
See http://www.aim.org/publications/aim_report/2002/postcards/05/chertoff.html.
So long before Satam As Suqami's pristine passport escaped the inferno at Ground Zero in New York, or the red
bandana survived the total obliteration of Flight 93, or the thousands of airline part serial numbers -- engraved in heat
resistant alloy steel -- escaped recovery, certain FBI officials were doing their monkey business to hide the true circumstances
of the shootdown of TWA Flight 800.
 Most shocking was their dismissive treatment
of Linda Kabot's chance photo of what appears to be a cruise missile on its way toward Flight 800 minutes before the explosion.
They're still there!
Kabot's photo was published by Paris Match on 7 November 1996, and a close-up of the
missile is shown below.
For more, see TWA Flight 800 Ten Years On at http://www.show-the-house.com/id13.html.
9/11 and the TWA Flight 800 shootdown share some common elements.
Both involve remote controlled piloting
of at least one aerial vehicle.
Both took place in the midst of military exercises.
Both triggered a
rush to judgment that Arabs were to blame.
Both fit the profile of a false flag intelligence operation to provide
a pretext for war.
The rule "Go massive" made 9/11 a success.
See Open Letters on 9/11 to
the Attorney General of the USA at http://www.show-the-house.com/id79.html and http://www.show-the-house.com/id54.html.
Stephen M. St. John 
Update December 2013:
On the 17th anniversary of the downing of TWA Flight 800 EPIX TV showed an excellent documentary film by Kristina Borjesson
which includes testimonies of former senior NTSB investigators and others who were directly involved in the TWA Flight 800
investigation. You will see and hear allegations of cover-up and criminal tampering with evidence including the testimonies
of 755 eyewitnesses as well as a complete repudiation of the NTSB report on the demise of TWA Flight 800. EPIX
TV is currently offering a generous 14 day free trial subscription which will enable anyone with an Internet connection to
view all of its movies including this very, very important documentary film on TWA Flight 800. Please visit http://www.epixhd.com/ and click the link at upper right for the free trial subscription. And for more information about
TWA Flight 800 visit http://flight800doc.com/. Bear in mind that the same FBI officials and others who acted so shamefully in the so-called TWA Flight 800 "investigation"
were also involved in the official lies, disinformation, stonewalling and control of information about 9/11. And bear
in mind that Borjesson had been dismissed from her job with CBS when she tried to expose the truth there as a responsible
TV journalist. Without a free press, we are not really free!
************************************************************************************************************************
|
